Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Artiodactyla Takımının Familya ve Türlerinin Karyotip Simetri/Asimetri İndeksi (S/AI) ile Karşılaştırılması

Year 2023, , 52 - 66, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.55213/kmujens.1259401

Abstract

S/AI formülü, yüksek hayvanlarda ve insanlarda karyotip asimetrisini belirlemek için kullanılan bir parametredir. Formül, 47 Artiodactyla türüne uygulanmıştır. Artiodactyla'da türler arası ve aileler arası ilişkileri gösteren dendrogramlar, 1.0000 ile 3.0000 arasında değişen S/AI değerlerine göre çizilmiştir. Dişi karyotip tipleri; sekiz familya, 18 cins ve 36 türde simetrik ve asimetrik arası, beş familya, dokuz cins ve 10 türde simetrik ve sadece tek bir familya, cins ve türde ise tam simetriktir. Erkek karyotip tipleri; sekiz familya, 18 cins ve 34 türde simetrik ve asimetrik arası, beş familya, sekiz cins ve dokuz türde simetrik ve sadece tek bir familya, cins ve türde ise tam simetriktir.

References

  • Adega F., Chaves R., Kofler A., Krausman PR., Masabanda J., Wienberg J., Guedes-Pinto H., High-resolution comparative chromosome painting in the Arizona collared peccary (Pecari tajacu, Tayassuidae): a comparison with the karyotype of pig and sheep, Chromosome Res., 14, 243-251, (2006).
  • Arslan A., Albayrak İ., C–banded karyotype and nucleolar organizer regions of wild boar, Sus scrofa (Artiodactyla: Suidae) from Anatolia, Turk. J. Biol., 33, 29-33, (2009).
  • Asher GW., Gallagher DS., Tate ML., Tedford C., Hybridization between sika deer (Cervus nippon) and axis deer (Axis axis), J. Hered., 90, 236-240, (1999).
  • Benirschke K., Kumamoto AT., Meritt DA., Chromosomes of the chacoan peccary, Catagonus wagneri (Rusconi), J. Hered., 76, 95-98, (1985).
  • Bosma AA., de Haan NA., The karyotype of Babyrousa babyrussa (Suidae, Mammalia), Acta Zool. Pathol. Antwer., 76, 17-27, (1981).
  • Bosma AA., Oliver WLR., Macdonald AA., The karyotype, including G– and C–banding patterns, of the pigmy hog Sus (Porcula) salvanius (Suidae, Mammalia), Genetica, 61, 99-106, (1983).
  • Bunch TD., Foote WC., Maciulis A., Chromosome banding pattern homologies and NORs for the bactrian camel, guanaco, and llama, J. Hered., 76, 115-118, (1985).
  • Chi J., Fu B., Nie W., Wang J., Graphodatsky AS., Yang F., New insights into the karyotypic relationships of Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi), forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) and gayal (Bos frontalis), Cytogenet. Genome Res., 108, 310-316, (2005).
  • Di Berardino D., Nicodemo D., Coppola G., King AW., Ramunno L., Cosenza G.F., Iannuzzi L., Di Meo G.P., Balmus G., Rubes J., Cytogenetic characterization of alpaca (Lama pacos, fam. Camelidae) prometaphase chromosomes, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 115, 138-144, (2006).
  • Eroğlu HE., Which chromosomes are subtelocentric or acrocentric? A new karyotype symmetry/asymmetry index, Caryologia, 68, 239-245, (2015).
  • Fordyce-Boyer R., Sanger T., Loskutoff N., Kumamoto A.T., Johnston L., Armstrong D., Comparative cytogenetic study of the roan and sable antelope, Hippotragus equinus and Hippotragus niger, Appl. Cytogen., 21, 189-191, (1995).
  • Gallagher Jr DS., Davis SK., De Donato M., Burzlaff JD., Womack JE., Taylor JF., Kumamoto AT., A molecular cytogenetic analysis of the tribe Bovini (Artiodactyla: Bovidae: Bovinae) with an emphasis on sex chromosome morphology and NOR distribution, Chromosome Res., 7, 481-492, (1999).
  • Gallagher Jr DS., Womack JE., Chromosome conservation in the Bovidae, J. Hered., 83, 287-298, (1992).
  • Gerneke WH., The chromosomes and neutrophils nuclear appendages of Hippopotamus amphibius Linnaeus 1758, Onderstepoort J. Vet., 32, 181-186, (1965).
  • Giannoni MA., Ferrari I., Estudo biometrico do cariotipo da especie Tayassu albirostris Illinger 1815, Ciencia e Cultura Sao Paulo, 28, 432-435, (1976).
  • González BA., Palma RE., Zapata B., Marín JC., Taxonomic and biogeographical status of guanaco Lama guanacoe (Artiodactyla, Camelidae), Mammal. Rev., 36, 157-178, (2006).
  • Gray AN., Mammalian hybrids: A check-list with bibliography, 10. Wallingford, UK, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, pp. 60-120, (1972).
  • Gustavsson I., Sundt C., Karyotypes in five species of deer (Alces alces L., Capreolus capreolus L., Cervus elaphus, Cervus nippon nippon Temm and Dama dama L.), Hereditas, 60, 233-248, (1968).
  • Herzog S., The karyotype of the red deer (Cervus elaphus L.), Caryologia, 40, 299-305, (1987).
  • Hösli P., Lang EM., A preliminary note on the chromosomes of the Giraffidae: Giraffa camelopardalis and Okapia johnstoni, Mamm. Chrom. News., 11, 109-110, (1970).
  • Hsu TC., Benirschke K., Vicugna vicugna (Vicuna), An Atlas of Mammalian Chromosomes, 1, 157-159, (1967).
  • https://www.itis.gov/ (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2023).
  • http://www.iucnredlist.org/ (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2023).
  • Iannuzzi L., Di Meo GP., Perucatti A., G- and R-banded prometaphase karyotypes in goat (Capra hircus L.), Caryologia, 49, 267-277, (1996).
  • Kadwell M., Fernandez M., Stanley H., Baldi R., Wheeler JC., Rosadio R., Bruford M., Genetic analysis reveals the wild ancestors of the llama and alpaca, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. Bio., 268, 2575-2584, (2001).
  • Kim KS., Tanaka K., Ismail DB., Maruyama S., Matsubayashi H., Endo H., Fukuta K., Kimura J., Cytogenetic comparison of the lesser mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus) and the greater mouse deer (T. napu), Caryologia, 57, 229-243, (2004).
  • Koulischer L., Tijskens J., Montelmans J., Mammalian cytogenetics IV. The chromosomes of two male Camelidae: Camelus bacterianus and Lama vicugna, Acta Zool. Pathol. Antverp., 52, 89-92, (1971).
  • Koulischer L., Tyskens J., Mortelmans J., Mammalian cytogenetics. VII. The chromosomes of Cervus canadensis, Elaphurus davidianus, Cervus nippon (Temminck) and Pudu pudu, Acta Zool. Path. Antver., 56, 25-30, (1972).
  • Lux E., Perez M., Volobouev VT., G– and C–banded karyotype of the markhor Capra falconeri heptneri, and comparison of its banding patterns with the Alpine ibex Capra ibex and cattle Bos taurus, Acta Theriol., 49, 131-137, (2004).
  • Martin E., Celep F., Eroğlu HE., Comparative chromosomal features and new karyological data in Salvia: B‑chromosomes, polyploidy, dysploidy and symmetric karyotypes, Braz. J. Bot., 45, 625-634, (2022).
  • Martin E., Kahraman A., Dirmenci T., Bozkurt H., Eroğlu HE., New chromosomal data and karyological relationships in Geranium: basic number alterations, dysploidy, polyploidy, and karyotype asymmetry, Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 65, e22210354, (2022).
  • Melander Y., Melander EH., Chromosome studies in African wild pigs (Suidae, Mammalia), Hereditas, 92, 283-289, (1980).
  • Nadler CF., Hoffmann RS., Woolf A., G–band patterns, chromosomal homologies, and evolutionary relationships among wild sheep, goats, and aoudads (mammalia, artiodactyla), Experientia, 30, 744-746, (1974).
  • Naik SN., Bhatia HM., Baxi AJ., Naik PV., Hematological study of Indian spotted deer (Axis deer), J. Exp. Zool., 155, 231-235, (1964).
  • Peruzzi L., Eroğlu HE., Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? Comp. Cytogen., 7, 1-9, (2013).
  • Popescu CP., Idiograms of yak (Bos grunniens), cattle (Bos taurus) and their hybrids, Ann. Génét. Sél. Anim., 1, 207-217, (1969).
  • Samman MA., Al-Saleh AA., Sheth KV., Detailed description and nomenclature of G–banded Arabian camel (C. dromedarius) chromosomes, Caryologia, 45, 359-365, (1992).
  • Sokolov VE., Orlov VN., Chudinovskaya GA., Danilkin AA., Chromosomal differences between two roe subspecies (Capreolus capreolus L. and Capreolus capreolus pygargus Pall.), Zool. Zh., 57, 1109-1112, (1978).
  • Wang Z., Du DR., Karyotypes of Cervidae and their evolution, Acta Zool. Sinica, 29, 214-222, (1983).
  • Wurster DH., Benirschke K., Chromosome studies on some deer, the springbok, and the pronghorn with notes on placentation in deer, Cytologia, 32, 273-285, (1967a).
  • Wurster DH., Benirschke K., The chromosomes of twenty-three species of Cervoidea and Bovoidea, Mamm. Chrom. News., 8, 226-229, (1967b).

The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla with Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI)

Year 2023, , 52 - 66, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.55213/kmujens.1259401

Abstract

The S/AI formula is a parameter used to determine the karyotype asymmetry in higher animals and humans. The formula was performed to the 47 Artiodactyla species. According to the S/AI values between 1.0000 and 3.0000, the dendrograms were drawn demonstrating the interspecies and interfamilies relationships in Artiodactyla. The female karyotype types are between symmetric and asymmetric in the eight families, 18 genera and 36 species; symmetric in the five families, nine genera and 10 species; full symmetric in the only one family, genus and species. The male karyotype types are between symmetric and asymmetric in the 8 families, 18 genera and 34 species; symmetric in the five families, eight genera and nine species; full symmetric in the only one family, genus and species.

References

  • Adega F., Chaves R., Kofler A., Krausman PR., Masabanda J., Wienberg J., Guedes-Pinto H., High-resolution comparative chromosome painting in the Arizona collared peccary (Pecari tajacu, Tayassuidae): a comparison with the karyotype of pig and sheep, Chromosome Res., 14, 243-251, (2006).
  • Arslan A., Albayrak İ., C–banded karyotype and nucleolar organizer regions of wild boar, Sus scrofa (Artiodactyla: Suidae) from Anatolia, Turk. J. Biol., 33, 29-33, (2009).
  • Asher GW., Gallagher DS., Tate ML., Tedford C., Hybridization between sika deer (Cervus nippon) and axis deer (Axis axis), J. Hered., 90, 236-240, (1999).
  • Benirschke K., Kumamoto AT., Meritt DA., Chromosomes of the chacoan peccary, Catagonus wagneri (Rusconi), J. Hered., 76, 95-98, (1985).
  • Bosma AA., de Haan NA., The karyotype of Babyrousa babyrussa (Suidae, Mammalia), Acta Zool. Pathol. Antwer., 76, 17-27, (1981).
  • Bosma AA., Oliver WLR., Macdonald AA., The karyotype, including G– and C–banding patterns, of the pigmy hog Sus (Porcula) salvanius (Suidae, Mammalia), Genetica, 61, 99-106, (1983).
  • Bunch TD., Foote WC., Maciulis A., Chromosome banding pattern homologies and NORs for the bactrian camel, guanaco, and llama, J. Hered., 76, 115-118, (1985).
  • Chi J., Fu B., Nie W., Wang J., Graphodatsky AS., Yang F., New insights into the karyotypic relationships of Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi), forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) and gayal (Bos frontalis), Cytogenet. Genome Res., 108, 310-316, (2005).
  • Di Berardino D., Nicodemo D., Coppola G., King AW., Ramunno L., Cosenza G.F., Iannuzzi L., Di Meo G.P., Balmus G., Rubes J., Cytogenetic characterization of alpaca (Lama pacos, fam. Camelidae) prometaphase chromosomes, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 115, 138-144, (2006).
  • Eroğlu HE., Which chromosomes are subtelocentric or acrocentric? A new karyotype symmetry/asymmetry index, Caryologia, 68, 239-245, (2015).
  • Fordyce-Boyer R., Sanger T., Loskutoff N., Kumamoto A.T., Johnston L., Armstrong D., Comparative cytogenetic study of the roan and sable antelope, Hippotragus equinus and Hippotragus niger, Appl. Cytogen., 21, 189-191, (1995).
  • Gallagher Jr DS., Davis SK., De Donato M., Burzlaff JD., Womack JE., Taylor JF., Kumamoto AT., A molecular cytogenetic analysis of the tribe Bovini (Artiodactyla: Bovidae: Bovinae) with an emphasis on sex chromosome morphology and NOR distribution, Chromosome Res., 7, 481-492, (1999).
  • Gallagher Jr DS., Womack JE., Chromosome conservation in the Bovidae, J. Hered., 83, 287-298, (1992).
  • Gerneke WH., The chromosomes and neutrophils nuclear appendages of Hippopotamus amphibius Linnaeus 1758, Onderstepoort J. Vet., 32, 181-186, (1965).
  • Giannoni MA., Ferrari I., Estudo biometrico do cariotipo da especie Tayassu albirostris Illinger 1815, Ciencia e Cultura Sao Paulo, 28, 432-435, (1976).
  • González BA., Palma RE., Zapata B., Marín JC., Taxonomic and biogeographical status of guanaco Lama guanacoe (Artiodactyla, Camelidae), Mammal. Rev., 36, 157-178, (2006).
  • Gray AN., Mammalian hybrids: A check-list with bibliography, 10. Wallingford, UK, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, pp. 60-120, (1972).
  • Gustavsson I., Sundt C., Karyotypes in five species of deer (Alces alces L., Capreolus capreolus L., Cervus elaphus, Cervus nippon nippon Temm and Dama dama L.), Hereditas, 60, 233-248, (1968).
  • Herzog S., The karyotype of the red deer (Cervus elaphus L.), Caryologia, 40, 299-305, (1987).
  • Hösli P., Lang EM., A preliminary note on the chromosomes of the Giraffidae: Giraffa camelopardalis and Okapia johnstoni, Mamm. Chrom. News., 11, 109-110, (1970).
  • Hsu TC., Benirschke K., Vicugna vicugna (Vicuna), An Atlas of Mammalian Chromosomes, 1, 157-159, (1967).
  • https://www.itis.gov/ (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2023).
  • http://www.iucnredlist.org/ (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2023).
  • Iannuzzi L., Di Meo GP., Perucatti A., G- and R-banded prometaphase karyotypes in goat (Capra hircus L.), Caryologia, 49, 267-277, (1996).
  • Kadwell M., Fernandez M., Stanley H., Baldi R., Wheeler JC., Rosadio R., Bruford M., Genetic analysis reveals the wild ancestors of the llama and alpaca, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. Bio., 268, 2575-2584, (2001).
  • Kim KS., Tanaka K., Ismail DB., Maruyama S., Matsubayashi H., Endo H., Fukuta K., Kimura J., Cytogenetic comparison of the lesser mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus) and the greater mouse deer (T. napu), Caryologia, 57, 229-243, (2004).
  • Koulischer L., Tijskens J., Montelmans J., Mammalian cytogenetics IV. The chromosomes of two male Camelidae: Camelus bacterianus and Lama vicugna, Acta Zool. Pathol. Antverp., 52, 89-92, (1971).
  • Koulischer L., Tyskens J., Mortelmans J., Mammalian cytogenetics. VII. The chromosomes of Cervus canadensis, Elaphurus davidianus, Cervus nippon (Temminck) and Pudu pudu, Acta Zool. Path. Antver., 56, 25-30, (1972).
  • Lux E., Perez M., Volobouev VT., G– and C–banded karyotype of the markhor Capra falconeri heptneri, and comparison of its banding patterns with the Alpine ibex Capra ibex and cattle Bos taurus, Acta Theriol., 49, 131-137, (2004).
  • Martin E., Celep F., Eroğlu HE., Comparative chromosomal features and new karyological data in Salvia: B‑chromosomes, polyploidy, dysploidy and symmetric karyotypes, Braz. J. Bot., 45, 625-634, (2022).
  • Martin E., Kahraman A., Dirmenci T., Bozkurt H., Eroğlu HE., New chromosomal data and karyological relationships in Geranium: basic number alterations, dysploidy, polyploidy, and karyotype asymmetry, Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 65, e22210354, (2022).
  • Melander Y., Melander EH., Chromosome studies in African wild pigs (Suidae, Mammalia), Hereditas, 92, 283-289, (1980).
  • Nadler CF., Hoffmann RS., Woolf A., G–band patterns, chromosomal homologies, and evolutionary relationships among wild sheep, goats, and aoudads (mammalia, artiodactyla), Experientia, 30, 744-746, (1974).
  • Naik SN., Bhatia HM., Baxi AJ., Naik PV., Hematological study of Indian spotted deer (Axis deer), J. Exp. Zool., 155, 231-235, (1964).
  • Peruzzi L., Eroğlu HE., Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? Comp. Cytogen., 7, 1-9, (2013).
  • Popescu CP., Idiograms of yak (Bos grunniens), cattle (Bos taurus) and their hybrids, Ann. Génét. Sél. Anim., 1, 207-217, (1969).
  • Samman MA., Al-Saleh AA., Sheth KV., Detailed description and nomenclature of G–banded Arabian camel (C. dromedarius) chromosomes, Caryologia, 45, 359-365, (1992).
  • Sokolov VE., Orlov VN., Chudinovskaya GA., Danilkin AA., Chromosomal differences between two roe subspecies (Capreolus capreolus L. and Capreolus capreolus pygargus Pall.), Zool. Zh., 57, 1109-1112, (1978).
  • Wang Z., Du DR., Karyotypes of Cervidae and their evolution, Acta Zool. Sinica, 29, 214-222, (1983).
  • Wurster DH., Benirschke K., Chromosome studies on some deer, the springbok, and the pronghorn with notes on placentation in deer, Cytologia, 32, 273-285, (1967a).
  • Wurster DH., Benirschke K., The chromosomes of twenty-three species of Cervoidea and Bovoidea, Mamm. Chrom. News., 8, 226-229, (1967b).
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Structural Biology
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Halil Erhan Eroğlu 0000-0002-4509-4712

Publication Date June 30, 2023
Submission Date March 2, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Eroğlu, H. E. (2023). The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla with Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI). Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.55213/kmujens.1259401
AMA Eroğlu HE. The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla with Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI). KMUJENS. June 2023;5(1):52-66. doi:10.55213/kmujens.1259401
Chicago Eroğlu, Halil Erhan. “The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla With Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI)”. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 5, no. 1 (June 2023): 52-66. https://doi.org/10.55213/kmujens.1259401.
EndNote Eroğlu HE (June 1, 2023) The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla with Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI). Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 5 1 52–66.
IEEE H. E. Eroğlu, “The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla with Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI)”, KMUJENS, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 52–66, 2023, doi: 10.55213/kmujens.1259401.
ISNAD Eroğlu, Halil Erhan. “The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla With Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI)”. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 5/1 (June 2023), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.55213/kmujens.1259401.
JAMA Eroğlu HE. The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla with Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI). KMUJENS. 2023;5:52–66.
MLA Eroğlu, Halil Erhan. “The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla With Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI)”. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 1, 2023, pp. 52-66, doi:10.55213/kmujens.1259401.
Vancouver Eroğlu HE. The Comparison of the Families and Species of Order Artiodactyla with Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index (S/AI). KMUJENS. 2023;5(1):52-66.

KMUJENS’nde yayınlanan makaleler Creative Commons Atıf-Gayriticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY-NC) ile lisanslanmıştır. İçeriğin ticari amaçlı kullanımı yasaktır. Dergide yer alan makaleler, yazarına ve orijinal kaynağa atıfta bulunulduğu sürece kullanılabilir.