Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2019, , 245 - 249, 21.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.430049

Abstract

Amaç: Lenfadenopatilerde malignite
çıkma olasılığı  %1-3 oranındadır ve en
sık lenfomalar gözlenir. Ultrasonografi ayırıcı tanıda hekime bazı bulguları
ile malignite yönünde yardımcı olabilir. Tanısı kesinleştirilememiş, malignite
düşünülen vakalarda biyopsi yapılması esastır. Bu çalışmada patolojik lenfadopatili hastaların sosyo demografik verileri
klinik laboratuvar, ultrason  bulguları
ve histopatoloji sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması hedeflenmiştir.



Yöntemler: Bu
çalışmada Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi’ne Ocak 2014 ve
Eylül 2016 tarihleri arasında başvuran 857 lenfadenopatili hastadan (328
kız-529 erkek)  50 adet (39’u erkek, 11’i
kız) patolojik lenfadenopatili hasta geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi.



Bulgular: Patolojik
lenfadenopati tanılı 50 hastanın yaşları 12-192 ay arasında değişmektedir.
Hastaların 24’ünde lenfadenopati boyutu 3 cm’nin üzerindeydi.
Lenfadenopatilerden 35’i servikal, 15’i ise servikal dışı lokalizasyona
sahipti. Bu hastalardan 35’ine reaktif, 15’ine ise non-reaktif USG sonucu
saptandı. Hastalardan 38’inde benign hastalık, 12’sinde ise malignite saptandı.
Yapılan istatistiksel analizler neticesinde patoloji sonuçları ile USG özelliği
arasında ve aynı zamanda lenfadenopati boyutu ile USG’de tespit edilen boyut
arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptandı (p<0,05). Çalışmamız da bening ve
malign olanların USG özelliği ve ateş açısından karşılaştırılmasında benign
olanların 12’sinde (%31,6), malign olanların ise 9’unda (%75) ateş söz konusu
olup gruplar arasında ateş varlığı açısından anlamlı farklılık vardır
(p<0,05).



Sonuç: Lenfadenopati
ile başvuran olgularda öykü ve fizik incelemeden sonra lenfadenopatinin ciddi
bir hastalığın belirtisi olup olmadığı araştırılmalıdır.

References

  • 1- Adelusola KA, Oyelami AO, Odesanmi WO, Adeodu OO. Lymphadenopathy in Nigerianchildren. West Afr J Med 1996;15:97-100. 2- Adesuwa Olu-Eddo N, Egbagbe EE. Peripheral lymphadenopathy in Nigerian children. Niger J Clin Pract 2006;9:134-8. 3- Friedmann AM. Evaluation and management of lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Rev 2008;29:53-60. 4- Baptist EC, Villalba MH. Benign enlargement of the mandibulofacial lymph node. Pediatrics 2000;105:467.5- Ahuja A, Ying M. An overview of neck node sonography. Invest Radiol 2002;37:333-42. 6- Ahuja A, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: is power Doppler sonography routinely indicated? Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:353-9.7- Ahuja A, Ying M. Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes. Clin Radiol 2003;58:359-66.8- Ahuja AT, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1691-9.9- Herzog LW. Prevalence of lymphadenopathy of the head and neck in infants and children. Clin Pediatr (Phila)1983;22:485-7. 10- Karadeniz C, Oguz A, Ezer U, Oztürk G, Dursun A. The etiology of peripheral lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1999;16:525-31.11- Oguz A, Karadeniz C, Temel EA, Citak EC, Okur FV. Evaluation of peripheral lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006;23:549-6112- Tekgül H, Oztop S, Cetingül N, Soydan S, Nisli G. A prospective study of peripheral lymphadenopathy in childhood. J Trop Pediatr 1997;43:117-8.13- Kumral A, Olgun N, Uysal KM, et al. Assessment of peripheral lymphadenopathies: experience at a pediatric hematology-oncology department in Turkey. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002;19:211-8.14- Sierra ML, Vegas E, Blanco-González JE, et al. Kikuchi's disease with multisystemic involvement and adverse reaction to drugs.Pediatrics 1999;104(2):e24.15- Lin SH, Ko WS, Lee HS, Hwang WS. Kikuchi's disease associated with lupus-like syndrome--a fatal case. J Rheumatol 1992;19:1995-6.16- Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho SY, et al. Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes. Cancer Imaging 2008;8:48-56.17- Selimoğlu MA, Selimoğlu E, Alp H. Çocuklarda Servikal Lenfadenopati. T Klin J Pediatr 1998;7: 14-17. 18- Knight PJ, Mulne AF, Vassy LE. When is lymph node biopsy indicated in children with enlarged peripheral nodes. Pediatrics 1982;69:391-6.

COMPARISON OF HISTOPATHOLOGY RESULTS WITH CLINICAL, LABORATORY, ULTRASONOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN PATIENTS WITH PATHOLOGIC LYMPHADENOPATHY

Year 2019, , 245 - 249, 21.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.430049

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The likelihood of malignancy in lymphadenopathies is 1-3% and the mostly lymphomas are seen. Ultrasonography may be helpful in malignancy with some findings in the differential diagnosis of the disease. In cases where malignancy is suspected, which the diagnosis is incomplete, the biopsy is required. In this study, we aimed to compare sociodemographic data of clinical, laboratory, ultrasound findings and histopathology of patients with pathologic lymphadenopathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this purpose, among 857 lymphadenopathic patients (328 females-529 males) who were admitted to Kahramanmaras Sütçü İmam University Medical Faculty Hospital between January 2014 and September 2016, 50 patients (39 male, 11 female) were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS: The ages of the 50 patients included in the study ranged from 12 months to 192 months. Lymphadenopathy size was over 3 cm in 24 of the patients. Of the lymphadenopathies, 35 had cervical and 15 had non-cervical localization. Among these patients, it was diagnosed with reactive in 35 patients and non-reactive in 15 patients. Of the patients, 38 had benign disease and malignancy was observed in 12 patients. As a result of the statistical analyzes, a significantly correlated relationship was found between pathology results and ultrasonography as well as lymphadenopathy size and the size observed in ultrasonography (p<0.05). In our study, in terms of comparison for usg feature and fever between benign and malign, fever was seen in 12 (31.6%) of benign patients, and 9 (75%) of malignant patients, as there was a significant difference between groups in terms of the presence of fever (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: After examining medical history and physical examination of the patients with lymphadenopathy, lymphadenopathy should be investigated for signs of a serious illness.

References

  • 1- Adelusola KA, Oyelami AO, Odesanmi WO, Adeodu OO. Lymphadenopathy in Nigerianchildren. West Afr J Med 1996;15:97-100. 2- Adesuwa Olu-Eddo N, Egbagbe EE. Peripheral lymphadenopathy in Nigerian children. Niger J Clin Pract 2006;9:134-8. 3- Friedmann AM. Evaluation and management of lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Rev 2008;29:53-60. 4- Baptist EC, Villalba MH. Benign enlargement of the mandibulofacial lymph node. Pediatrics 2000;105:467.5- Ahuja A, Ying M. An overview of neck node sonography. Invest Radiol 2002;37:333-42. 6- Ahuja A, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: is power Doppler sonography routinely indicated? Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:353-9.7- Ahuja A, Ying M. Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes. Clin Radiol 2003;58:359-66.8- Ahuja AT, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1691-9.9- Herzog LW. Prevalence of lymphadenopathy of the head and neck in infants and children. Clin Pediatr (Phila)1983;22:485-7. 10- Karadeniz C, Oguz A, Ezer U, Oztürk G, Dursun A. The etiology of peripheral lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1999;16:525-31.11- Oguz A, Karadeniz C, Temel EA, Citak EC, Okur FV. Evaluation of peripheral lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006;23:549-6112- Tekgül H, Oztop S, Cetingül N, Soydan S, Nisli G. A prospective study of peripheral lymphadenopathy in childhood. J Trop Pediatr 1997;43:117-8.13- Kumral A, Olgun N, Uysal KM, et al. Assessment of peripheral lymphadenopathies: experience at a pediatric hematology-oncology department in Turkey. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002;19:211-8.14- Sierra ML, Vegas E, Blanco-González JE, et al. Kikuchi's disease with multisystemic involvement and adverse reaction to drugs.Pediatrics 1999;104(2):e24.15- Lin SH, Ko WS, Lee HS, Hwang WS. Kikuchi's disease associated with lupus-like syndrome--a fatal case. J Rheumatol 1992;19:1995-6.16- Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho SY, et al. Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes. Cancer Imaging 2008;8:48-56.17- Selimoğlu MA, Selimoğlu E, Alp H. Çocuklarda Servikal Lenfadenopati. T Klin J Pediatr 1998;7: 14-17. 18- Knight PJ, Mulne AF, Vassy LE. When is lymph node biopsy indicated in children with enlarged peripheral nodes. Pediatrics 1982;69:391-6.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Pınar Kesik This is me

Can Acıpayam

Fatih Temiz This is me

Nursel Yurttutan

Ahmet Gökhan Güler

Hamide Sayar This is me

Tuğba Kandemir Gülmez This is me

Publication Date October 21, 2019
Acceptance Date December 25, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Kesik, P., Acıpayam, C., Temiz, F., Yurttutan, N., et al. (2019). PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, 20(4), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.430049
AMA Kesik P, Acıpayam C, Temiz F, Yurttutan N, Güler AG, Sayar H, Kandemir Gülmez T. PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. KTD. October 2019;20(4):245-249. doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.430049
Chicago Kesik, Pınar, Can Acıpayam, Fatih Temiz, Nursel Yurttutan, Ahmet Gökhan Güler, Hamide Sayar, and Tuğba Kandemir Gülmez. “PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 20, no. 4 (October 2019): 245-49. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.430049.
EndNote Kesik P, Acıpayam C, Temiz F, Yurttutan N, Güler AG, Sayar H, Kandemir Gülmez T (October 1, 2019) PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 20 4 245–249.
IEEE P. Kesik, C. Acıpayam, F. Temiz, N. Yurttutan, A. G. Güler, H. Sayar, and T. Kandemir Gülmez, “PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, KTD, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 245–249, 2019, doi: 10.18229/kocatepetip.430049.
ISNAD Kesik, Pınar et al. “PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 20/4 (October 2019), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.430049.
JAMA Kesik P, Acıpayam C, Temiz F, Yurttutan N, Güler AG, Sayar H, Kandemir Gülmez T. PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. KTD. 2019;20:245–249.
MLA Kesik, Pınar et al. “PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 4, 2019, pp. 245-9, doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.430049.
Vancouver Kesik P, Acıpayam C, Temiz F, Yurttutan N, Güler AG, Sayar H, Kandemir Gülmez T. PATOLOJİK LENFADENOPATİLERDE KLİNİK, LABORATUAR, ULTRASON BULGULARI İLE HİSTOPATOLOJİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. KTD. 2019;20(4):245-9.

88x31.png
Bu Dergi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.