Research Article

THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS

Volume: 23 Number: 1 January 17, 2022
TR EN

THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative diagnosis is very important in determining the treatment algorithm in cranial lesions. The aim of this study is to compare the results of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which is one of the preoperative imaging methods, with the results of pathology and to reveal its effectiveness in diagnosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty five patients who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging among 75 patients who were operated for cranial lesions in our clinic between 2016 - 2019 were included in the study. N-acetyl aspartate, creatine, choline and lactate values were calculated as biochemical metabolites, and preoperative diagnoses made according to these values were compared with postoperative pathology results and discussed in the light of the literature.
RESULTS: A total of 35 patients, 20 male and 15 female, were included in the study. The age range of the patients was between 18 - 82. As a result of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 29 patients were diagnosed with high grade glial tumors. As a result of the postoperative evaluation, the magnetic resonance spectroscopy results of 27 patients were found to be compatible with the pathology results, while differences were observed in 8 patients. A significant increase in choline peak and choline / NAA ratio was noted in high-grade glial tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a high correlation between the preoperative evaluations obtained by magnetic resonance spectroscopy which is used in the differential diagnosis of cranial lesions, and the pathological diagnosis.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Fink JR, Muzi M, Peck M, Krohn KA. Continuing education: Multimodality brain tumor imaging - MRI, PET, and PET / MRI. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1554-61.
  2. 2. Warren KE. NMR spectroscopy and pediatric brain tumors. Oncologist. 2004;9(3):312-18.
  3. 3. Tosun A, Serifoglu I. Imaging of Central Nervous System Tumors. Acta Med Alanya. 2018;2(1):56-61.
  4. 4. Najjar AM, Johnson JM, Schellingerhout D. The emerging role of amino acid PET in neuro-oncolgy. Bioengineering (Basel). 2018;5(4):104.
  5. 5. Aksoy FG, Yerli H. Dynamic contrast brain perfusion imaging: technical principles, pitfalls and problems. Journal of diagnostic and interventional radiology. 2003;9:309-14.
  6. 6. Patel P, Baradaran H, Delgado D, et al. MR perfusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of high-grade gliomas after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2017;9:118-27.
  7. 7. Fleischmann DF, Unterrainer M, Corradini S, et al. Report of rst recurrent glioma patients examined with PET-MRI prior to reirradiation. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0216111.
  8. 8. Langen KJ, Galldiks N, Hattingen E, Shah NJ. Advances in neuro-oncology imaging. Nature Reviews. Neurol. 2017;13:279-89.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 17, 2022

Submission Date

January 6, 2021

Acceptance Date

May 26, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 23 Number: 1

APA
Yıldızhan, S., Aslan, A., Boyacı, M. G., Özer Gökaslan, Ç., Rakip, U., & Kılınç, K. A. (2022). THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, 23(1), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.855201
AMA
1.Yıldızhan S, Aslan A, Boyacı MG, Özer Gökaslan Ç, Rakip U, Kılınç KA. THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2022;23(1):82-87. doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.855201
Chicago
Yıldızhan, Serhat, Adem Aslan, Mehmet Gazi Boyacı, Çiğdem Özer Gökaslan, Usame Rakip, and Kamil Anıl Kılınç. 2022. “THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 23 (1): 82-87. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.855201.
EndNote
Yıldızhan S, Aslan A, Boyacı MG, Özer Gökaslan Ç, Rakip U, Kılınç KA (January 1, 2022) THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 23 1 82–87.
IEEE
[1]S. Yıldızhan, A. Aslan, M. G. Boyacı, Ç. Özer Gökaslan, U. Rakip, and K. A. Kılınç, “THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS”, Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 82–87, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.18229/kocatepetip.855201.
ISNAD
Yıldızhan, Serhat - Aslan, Adem - Boyacı, Mehmet Gazi - Özer Gökaslan, Çiğdem - Rakip, Usame - Kılınç, Kamil Anıl. “THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 23/1 (January 1, 2022): 82-87. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.855201.
JAMA
1.Yıldızhan S, Aslan A, Boyacı MG, Özer Gökaslan Ç, Rakip U, Kılınç KA. THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2022;23:82–87.
MLA
Yıldızhan, Serhat, et al. “THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, vol. 23, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 82-87, doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.855201.
Vancouver
1.Serhat Yıldızhan, Adem Aslan, Mehmet Gazi Boyacı, Çiğdem Özer Gökaslan, Usame Rakip, Kamil Anıl Kılınç. THE IMPORTANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CRANIAL LESIONS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PATHOLOGY RESULTS. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi. 2022 Jan. 1;23(1):82-7. doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.855201