The Effect of Energy Saving in Wastewater Treatment Plant on the Environmental Sustainability of the Plant

Year 2024, , 89 - 95, 31.05.2024

Simge Taner Çankaya

https://doi.org/10.34088/kojose.1349807

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have significant function for the urban water management. However, they can consume large amount of energy for reducing the pollutant concentration in aquatic environments. In this work, the effect of energy saving in the selected wastewater treatment plant (before and after the energy saving revisions) on the environmental sustainability of the plant was investigated by life cycle assessment (LCA). Two situations were assessed comparatively: WWTP-1 (before energy saving) and WWTP-2 (after energy saving). Life cycle impacts were evaluated in terms of both mid-point and end-point impact categories by ReCiPe 2016 methodology. The results showed that contribution of electricity consumption in WWTP-2 significantly decreased in almost all mid-point impact categories compared with WWTP-1. Considering damage assessment, overall environmental burden of WWTP-2 was determined to be 36% lower than WWTP-1. It was also noted that in addition to electricity saving, the method chosen for sludge disposal was decisive in the environmental performance of the wastewater treatment plant.

Keywords

energy saving, life cycle assessment, sustainability, Wastewater treatment plant

Project Number

FKA-2020-2087

References

• [1] Maktabifard M., Zaborowska E., & Makinia J., 2018. Achieving energy neutrality in wastewater treatment plants through energy savings and enhancing renewable energy production. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 17, pp.655-689.
• [2] Çankaya S., 2023. Evaluation of the impact of water reclamation on blue and grey water footprint in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Science of The Total Environment, 166196.
• [3] Longo S., d’Antoni B. M., Bongards M., Chaparro A., Cronrath A., Fatone F., ... & Hospido A., 2016. Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement. Applied energy, 179, pp.1251-1268.
• [4] Yan P., Qin R. C., Guo J. S., Yu Q., Li Z., Chen Y. P., & Fang F., 2017. Net-zero-energy model for sustainable wastewater treatment. Environmental science & technology, 51(2), pp.1017-1023.
• [5] Panepinto D., Fiore S., Zappone M., Genon G., & Meucci L., 2016. Evaluation of the energy efficiency of a large wastewater treatment plant in Italy. Applied Energy, 161, pp.404-411.
• [6] Gu Y., Li Y., Li X., Luo P., Wang H., Wang X., & Li F., 2017. Energy self-sufficient wastewater treatment plants: feasibilities and challenges. Energy Procedia, 105, pp.3741-3751.
• [7] Heijungs R., Huppes G., & Guinée J. B., 2010. Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis. Polymer degradation and stability, 95(3), pp.422-428.
• [8] ISO 14040 Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2006).
• [9] Gallego-Schmid A., & Tarpani R. R. Z., 2019. Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in developing countries: a review. Water research, 153, pp.63-79.
• [10] Sala S., Farioli F., & Zamagni A., 2013. Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, pp.1686-1697.
• [11] Risch E., Boutin C., & Roux P., 2021. Applying life cycle assessment to assess the environmental performance of decentralised versus centralised wastewater systems. Water Research, 196, 116991.
• [12] Patel K., & Singh S. K., 2022. A life cycle approach to environmental assessment of wastewater and sludge treatment processes. Water and Environment journal, 36(3), pp.412-424.
• [13] Sheikholeslami Z., Ehteshami M., Nazif S., & Semiarian A., 2022. The environmental assessment of tertiary treatment technologies for wastewater reuse by considering LCA uncertainty. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 168, pp.928-941.
• [14] Selvarajan S., 2021. Cradle-to-Gate LCA of Water Treatment Alternatives: A case study performed for Norrvatten’s future waterwork expansion.