ERRATUM: ”UNIQUENESS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHARING TWO FINITE SETS IN C WITH FINITE WEIGHT ”
Abstract
Theorem 1.1. Let S1 = {0, −a
n−1
n
}, S2 = {z : z
n + azn−1 + b = 0} where n(≥ 7)
be an integer and a and b be two nonzero constants such that z
n+azn−1+b = 0 has
no multiple root. If f and g be two non-constant meromorphic functions having no
simple pole such that Ef (S1, 0) = Eg(S1, 0) and Ef (S2, 2) = Eg(S2, 2), then f ≡ g.
Theorem 1.2. Let Si
, i = 1, 2 and f and g be taken as in Theorem 1.1 where
n(≥ 8) is an integer. If Ef (S1, 0) = Eg(S1, 0) and Ef (S2, 1) = Eg(S2, 1), then
f ≡ g.
Next by calculation it can be shown that in Lemma-2.2 we would always have p = 0.
So in Lemma-2.2 we should replace N(r, 0; f |≥ p+1)+N
r, −a
n−1
n
; f |≥ p + 1
by
N(r, 0; f) + N
r, −a
n−1
n
; f
. In that case the statement of the Lemma-2.2. should
be replaced by
Lemma-2.2. Let S1 and S2 be defined as in Theorem 1.1 and F, G be given
by (2.1). If for two non-constant meromorphic functions f and g, Ef (S1, 0) =
Eg(S1, 0), Ef (S2, 0) = Eg(S2, 0), where H 6≡ 0 then
N(r, H) ≤ N(r, 0; f) + N
r, −a
n − 1
n
; f
+ N∗(r, 1; F, G)
+N(r, ∞; f) + N(r, ∞; g) + N0(r, 0; f
0
) + N0(r, 0; g
0
),
where N0(r, 0; f
0
) is the reduced counting function of those zeros of f
0
which are
not the zeros of f
f − a
n−1
n
(F − 1) and N0(r, 0; g
0
) is similarly define
Keywords
References
- [1] Banerjee, A., Halder, G.: Uniqueness of meromorphic functions sharing two finite sets in $\mathbb{C}$ with finite weight. Konuralp J. Math. 2(2), 42–52 (2014)
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Mathematical Sciences
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
October 15, 2017
Submission Date
October 15, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 5 Number: 2
