BibTex RIS Cite

Reletionship Happiness Öuestionnaire (RHQ): Reliability and Validity in Turkish Sample

Year 2002, , 0 - 0, 01.03.2002
https://doi.org/10.1501/Kriz_0000000174

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was
to investigate the reliability and validity of The
Relationship Happiness Öuestionnaire' (RHQ) for married people developed by Fietcher,
Fitness and Blampied. The RHQ is a 6-item
self-report measurement and each item is
assessed on a 7-point scale. Method: RHQ was
administered to 83 couple (total 166 person).
The Marital Adjustment Test was used for the
criterion-related validity. Results: Internal reliability,
split-half, test-retest reliability, item analyses,
criterion-related validity analyses has
demonstrated its reliability and validity.
Conclusion: RHQ was identified as a reliable
and a valid instrument. The test can be used in
Turkish populations as a rapid measure of
relationship happiness.

References

  • Aiken LR. (1994) Psychological Testing and Assessment (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Azizoğlu-Binici S, Hovardaoğlu S (1996) Evlilik için Karşılaştırma Düzeyi Ölçeği'nin (EKDÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 11 (38): 66-76.
  • Bradbury TN, Fincham FD (I990) Attributions in marriage: Revievv and critique. Psychological Bulletin I07: 3-33.
  • Cox CL, Wexler MO, Rusbult CE, Gaines JR. SO (1997) Prescriptive support and commitment processes in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly60(1):79-90.
  • Duin J (1999) Intimacy isn't ali about sex. Insight on the Nevvs Sept 13, 15(34):28. Intemet'ten 14.12.2000'de infotrac veri tabanından alınmıştır: http://web4.infotrac.london.galegroup.com.
  • Fışıloğlu H and Demir A (2000) Applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European J of Psychological Assessment 16 (3): 214-218.
  • Fincham FD and Bradbury TN (1987) The Assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. J of Marriage and the Family 49: 797-809.
  • Fincham FD and Bradbury TN (1992) Assessing attributions in marriage: The relationship attribution measure. J of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (3): 457-468.
  • Fletcher GJO (1993) Cognition in close relationships. New Zealand J of Psychology 22(2): 69-81.
  • Fletcher GJO, Fincham F, Cramer L, Heron N (1987) The role of attributions in close relationships. J of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 481-489.
  • Fletcher GJO, Fitness J, Blampied M (1990) The link betvveen attributions and happiness in close relationships: The roles of depression and explanatory style. J of Social and Clinical Psychology 9 (2): 243-255.
  • Fletcher GJO, Simpson JA, Thomas G, Giles L (1999) Ideals in intimate relationships. J of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1): 72-89.
  • Forgas JP, Levinger G, Moylan SJ (1994) Feeling good and feeling close: Affective influences on the perception of intimate relationships. Personal Relationships 1:165-184.
  • Fredman N, Sherman R (I987) Handbook of Measurements for Marriage and Family Therapy. New York: Bruner, Masel Pub.
  • Freeston MH, Plechaty M. (1997)
  • Reconsideration of the Locke-VVallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it stili relevant for the 1990's?. Psychological Reports 81:419-434.
  • Fromm E (1982) Sevme Sanatı (Çev. I. Gündüz). İstanbul: Say Kitap Paz.
  • Gülerce A (1990) Aile yapısını değerlendirme aracı: Kuramsal ve teknik özellikleri. Serbest bildiri Raporu.VI.Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi.5-7 eylül, İstanbul: İstanbul Ünv.
  • Hunt RA (I978) The effect of item vveighting on the Locke-VVallace Marital Adjustment Scale. J of Marriage and the Family 40:249-256.
  • Kabakçı E, Tuğrul C, Öztan N (1993) Birthchnell Eş Değerlendirme Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması.Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 8(29):31-37.
  • Lemieux R, Hale JL (1999) Intimacy, passion and commitment in young romantic relationships: Successfully measuring the Triangular Theory of Love. Psychological Reports 85 (2):497-503.
  • Locke HJ, VVallace KM. (1959) Short maritaladjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living 21: 251-255.
  • Perlman D, Fehr B (1987) The development of intimate relationships. (Eds. D Perlman, S Duck).
  • İntimate Relationships. Newbury Park: Sage Pub. Sacher JA, Fine MA (1996) Predicting relationship status and satisfaction after six months among dating couples. J of Marriage and the Family 58(1): 21+. Intemet'ten 14.12.2000'de infotrac veri tabanından alınmıştır: http:// web 4. infotrac. london. galegroup.com.
  • Spanier GB, Levvis RA (1980) 'Marital quality: A revievv of the seventies'. J of Marriage and the Family 42: 825-839.
  • Sternberg RJ (1986) A Triangular theory of love. Psychological Revievv 93(2): 119-135.
  • Surra CA, Hughes DK (1997) Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. J of Marriage and the Family 59: 5- 21.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak Ş (1997) Evlilik uyumu ile nedensellik ve sorumluluk yüklemeleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 12(40): 55-64.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak Ş (1999a) Evlilikte Uyum Ölçeğinin (EUÖ) güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi 7(1):50- 57.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak Ş (1999b) İlişkilerde Yükleme Ölçeğinin (İYÖ) güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi 7(3):193- 199.
  • Voss K, Markievvicz D, Doyle AB (1999) Friendship, marriage and self-esteem. J of Social and Personal Relationships 16(1): 103-122.
  • VVaring EM, Tillman MP, Frelick L, Russell L, VVeisz G (1980) Concepts of intimacy in the general population. J of Nervous and Mental Disease 168: 471-474.

İLİŞKİLERDE MUTLULUK ÖLÇEĞİ (İMÖ): GÜVENİRLİK VE GEÇERLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Year 2002, , 0 - 0, 01.03.2002
https://doi.org/10.1501/Kriz_0000000174

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Fletcher,
Fitness ve Blampied tarafından geliştirilen
İlişkilerde Mutluluk Ölçeği-İMÖ (Relationship
Happiness Questionnaire)'nin evli kişiler için
güvenirlik ve geçerliğini belirlemektir. Ölçek 6
maddeden oluşmakta ve her madde yedi noktalı
bir ölçek üzerinden değerlendirilmektedir. Yöntem:
Ölçek 83 çifte (toplam 166 kişi) uygulanmış
ve ölçüt-bağımlı geçerlik için Evlilikte Uyum
Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: İç tutarlık, iki
yarım test, test-tekrar test, madde analizi ve ölçüt
bağımlı geçerlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin
Türkçe'sinin güvenilir ve geçerli olduğu ortaya
konmuştur. Sonuç: İMÖ'nin güvenilir ve geçerli
olduğu belirlenmiş, ilişkilerde yaşanan mutluluğu
ölçen hızlı bir ölçek olarak kültürümüze
kazandırılmıştır

References

  • Aiken LR. (1994) Psychological Testing and Assessment (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Azizoğlu-Binici S, Hovardaoğlu S (1996) Evlilik için Karşılaştırma Düzeyi Ölçeği'nin (EKDÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 11 (38): 66-76.
  • Bradbury TN, Fincham FD (I990) Attributions in marriage: Revievv and critique. Psychological Bulletin I07: 3-33.
  • Cox CL, Wexler MO, Rusbult CE, Gaines JR. SO (1997) Prescriptive support and commitment processes in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly60(1):79-90.
  • Duin J (1999) Intimacy isn't ali about sex. Insight on the Nevvs Sept 13, 15(34):28. Intemet'ten 14.12.2000'de infotrac veri tabanından alınmıştır: http://web4.infotrac.london.galegroup.com.
  • Fışıloğlu H and Demir A (2000) Applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European J of Psychological Assessment 16 (3): 214-218.
  • Fincham FD and Bradbury TN (1987) The Assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. J of Marriage and the Family 49: 797-809.
  • Fincham FD and Bradbury TN (1992) Assessing attributions in marriage: The relationship attribution measure. J of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (3): 457-468.
  • Fletcher GJO (1993) Cognition in close relationships. New Zealand J of Psychology 22(2): 69-81.
  • Fletcher GJO, Fincham F, Cramer L, Heron N (1987) The role of attributions in close relationships. J of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 481-489.
  • Fletcher GJO, Fitness J, Blampied M (1990) The link betvveen attributions and happiness in close relationships: The roles of depression and explanatory style. J of Social and Clinical Psychology 9 (2): 243-255.
  • Fletcher GJO, Simpson JA, Thomas G, Giles L (1999) Ideals in intimate relationships. J of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1): 72-89.
  • Forgas JP, Levinger G, Moylan SJ (1994) Feeling good and feeling close: Affective influences on the perception of intimate relationships. Personal Relationships 1:165-184.
  • Fredman N, Sherman R (I987) Handbook of Measurements for Marriage and Family Therapy. New York: Bruner, Masel Pub.
  • Freeston MH, Plechaty M. (1997)
  • Reconsideration of the Locke-VVallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it stili relevant for the 1990's?. Psychological Reports 81:419-434.
  • Fromm E (1982) Sevme Sanatı (Çev. I. Gündüz). İstanbul: Say Kitap Paz.
  • Gülerce A (1990) Aile yapısını değerlendirme aracı: Kuramsal ve teknik özellikleri. Serbest bildiri Raporu.VI.Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi.5-7 eylül, İstanbul: İstanbul Ünv.
  • Hunt RA (I978) The effect of item vveighting on the Locke-VVallace Marital Adjustment Scale. J of Marriage and the Family 40:249-256.
  • Kabakçı E, Tuğrul C, Öztan N (1993) Birthchnell Eş Değerlendirme Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması.Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 8(29):31-37.
  • Lemieux R, Hale JL (1999) Intimacy, passion and commitment in young romantic relationships: Successfully measuring the Triangular Theory of Love. Psychological Reports 85 (2):497-503.
  • Locke HJ, VVallace KM. (1959) Short maritaladjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living 21: 251-255.
  • Perlman D, Fehr B (1987) The development of intimate relationships. (Eds. D Perlman, S Duck).
  • İntimate Relationships. Newbury Park: Sage Pub. Sacher JA, Fine MA (1996) Predicting relationship status and satisfaction after six months among dating couples. J of Marriage and the Family 58(1): 21+. Intemet'ten 14.12.2000'de infotrac veri tabanından alınmıştır: http:// web 4. infotrac. london. galegroup.com.
  • Spanier GB, Levvis RA (1980) 'Marital quality: A revievv of the seventies'. J of Marriage and the Family 42: 825-839.
  • Sternberg RJ (1986) A Triangular theory of love. Psychological Revievv 93(2): 119-135.
  • Surra CA, Hughes DK (1997) Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. J of Marriage and the Family 59: 5- 21.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak Ş (1997) Evlilik uyumu ile nedensellik ve sorumluluk yüklemeleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 12(40): 55-64.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak Ş (1999a) Evlilikte Uyum Ölçeğinin (EUÖ) güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi 7(1):50- 57.
  • Tutarel-Kışlak Ş (1999b) İlişkilerde Yükleme Ölçeğinin (İYÖ) güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi 7(3):193- 199.
  • Voss K, Markievvicz D, Doyle AB (1999) Friendship, marriage and self-esteem. J of Social and Personal Relationships 16(1): 103-122.
  • VVaring EM, Tillman MP, Frelick L, Russell L, VVeisz G (1980) Concepts of intimacy in the general population. J of Nervous and Mental Disease 168: 471-474.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA52GN26MZ
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Tuterel Kışlak Şennur This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2002
Submission Date March 1, 2002
Published in Issue Year 2002

Cite

APA Kışlak Şennur, T. (2002). İLİŞKİLERDE MUTLULUK ÖLÇEĞİ (İMÖ): GÜVENİRLİK VE GEÇERLİK ÇALIŞMASI. Kriz Dergisi, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1501/Kriz_0000000174