A Utopian Personality: A Model Proposal on Social Entrepreneurs

Öz

Social entrepreneurship is a process that requires intense effort. In social entrepreneurship studies, the impact of this effort on social entrepreneurs has been ignored. This study aims to determine the relationship between social entrepreneur personality and psychological well-being. Based on this, variables affecting psychological well-being were identified in the proposed model. It was explained who social entrepreneurs are and how they are classified. After the data obtained, the behavioral patterns, motivations and personal characteristics of social entrepreneurs were suggested as independent variables in the model. Burnout and work alienation were determined as partial mediator variables affecting psychological well-being. This research can be considered significant because it includes negative psychological processes into social entrepreneurship research. The strengths and weaknesses of the proposed model are discussed. Scales were proposed to measure the model. In conclusion, suggestions were given especially for interested researchers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social Entrepreneur Personality
• Well-Being
• Burnout
• Work Alienation

Ütopik Bir Kişilik: Sosyal Girişimciler Üzerine Bir Model Önerisi

Öz

Sosyal girişimcilik yoğun çaba gerektiren bir süreçtir. Sosyal girişimcilik araştırmalarında söz konusu çabanın sosyal girişimciler üzerindeki etkisi göz ardı edilmiştir. Bu araştırmanın amacı sosyal girişimci kişiliği ile psikolojik iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesidir. Buradan hareketle önerilen modelde psikolojik iyi oluş duruma etki eden değişkenler tespit edilmiştir. Sosyal girişimcilerin kimler olduğu ve nasıl sınıflandırıldığı açıklanmıştır. Elde edilen veri sonrasında sosyal girişimcilerin davranış kalıpları, motivasyonları ve kişisel özellikleri modelde bağımsız değişken olarak önerilmiştir. Tükenmişlik ve işe yabancılaşma ise psikolojik iyi oluşa etki eden kısmi aracı değişkenler olarak saptanmıştır. Bu araştırma, olumsuz psikolojik süreçleri sosyal girişimcilik araştırmalarına dahil ettiği için önemli kabul edilebilir. Önerilen araştırma modelinin güçlü ve zayıf yanları tartışılmış olup ilgili ölçekler önerilmiştir. Araştırma sonunda özellikle ilgili araştırmacılara öneriler yer almaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal Girişimci Kişiliği
• İyi oluş
• Tükenmişlik
• İşe yabancılaşma

Kaynakça

1. Abebe, M. A., Kimakwa, S. ve Redd, T. (2020). Toward a typology of social entrepreneurs: the interplay between passionate activism and entrepreneurial expertise. Journal Of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(4), 509-530.
2. Abu-Saifan, S. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: definitions and boundaries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 22–27.
3. Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D. ve Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260-282.
4. Austin, J., Stevenson, H. ve Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30(1), 1–22.
5. Bacq, S. ve Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: a review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5-6), 373-403.
6. Bargsted, M., Picon, M., Salazar, A. ve Rojas, Y. (2013). Psychosocial characterization of social entrepreneurs: a comparative study. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 331-346.
7. Blaunner, R. (1964) Aliention and freedoom: the factory worker and his industry, Chicago: The Universty of Chicago Press.
8. Bornstein, D. (2004). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

9. Brown, G. D., Gardner, J., Oswald, A. J. ve Qian, J. (2008). Does wage rank affect employees’ well‐being? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 47(3), 355-389.
10. Can, E. ve Canbal, A. (2017). Türkiye’de ödül almış genç sosyal girişimcilerin profilleri üzerine bir araştırma. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (3), 117-136.
11. Catford, J. (1998). Social entrepreneurs are vital for health promotion—but they need supportive environments too. Health Promotion International, 13(2), 95-97.
12. Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship – Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal, 25(1), 5–26.
13. Cho, A. H. (2006). Politics, values and social entrepreneurship: A critical appraisal. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp 34–56). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Christopoulos, D. ve Vogl, S. (2015). The motivation of social entrepreneurs: the roles, agendas and relations of altruistic economic actors. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 1-30.
15. Clark, A. E. ve Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359-381.
16. Cohen, H., Kaspi-Baruch, O. ve Katz, H. (2019). The social entrepreneur puzzle: the background, personality and motivation of Israeli social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 211-231.
17. Conway, E., Monks, K., Fu, N., Alfes, K. ve Bailey, K. (2020). Reimagining alienation within a relational framework: evidence from the public sector in Ireland and the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(21), 2673-2694.
18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. ve Larson, R. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 978-994). Dordrecht: Springer.
19. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T. ve Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of management perspectives, 24(3), 37-57.
20. Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Non-profit Management & Leadership, 14(4), 411–424.
21. Day, J. ve Mody, M. (2017). Social entrepreneurship typologies and tourism: conceptual frameworks. Social entrepreneurship and tourism: Philosophy and practice, 57-80.
22. De Leeuw, E. (1999). Healthy cities: urban social entrepreneurship for health. Health Promotion International, 14(3), 261-270.
23. Dees, G. ve B. Battle Anderson. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series 1, no. 3: 39–66.
24. Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of ‘‘social entrepreneurship.’’ Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
25. Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship http://www.caseatduke.org/
26. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. In Journal of happiness studies: An interdisciplinary forum on subjective well-being. Springer.
27. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
28. Diochon, M. ve Anderson, A. R. (2009). Social enterprise and effectiveness: a process typology. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(1), 7-29.
29. Drayton, B. (2002). The citizen sector: becoming as entre- preneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3), 120–132.
30. Ernst, K. (2012). Social entrepreneurs and their personality. Social entrepreneurship and social business: an introduction and discussion with case studies, 51-64.
31. Forgeard, M. J., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L. ve Seligman, M. E. (2011). Doing the right thing: measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal Of Wellbeing, 1(1).
32. Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn‐out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159-165.
33. Harding, R. (2004). Social enterprise: the new economic engine? Business and Strategy Review, 15(4), 39–43.
34. Hartigan, P. (2006). It’s about people, not profits. Business Strategy Review, 17(4), 42–45.
35. Haugh, H. (2006). Social enterprise: beyond economic outcomes and individual returns. In J.
36. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Hibbert, S., Hogg, G. ve Quinn, T. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Understanding consumer motives for buying The Big Issue. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(3), 159–172.
38. Hirschfeld, R. R. ve Feild, H. S. (2000). Work centrality and work alienation: distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(7), 789-800.
39. Hoy, W., K. Blazovsky, R. ve Newland, W., (1983). Bureaucracy and alienation: a comparative analysis. The Journal of Educational Administration, 21 (2), 109-121.
40. Kannampuzha, M. ve Hockerts, K. (2019). Organizational social entrepreneurship: scale development and validation. Social Enterprise Journal, 15(3), 290-319.
41. Koe Hwee Nga, J. ve Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259- 282.
42. Korman, A. K., Wittig-Berman, U. ve Lang, D. (1981). Career success and personal failure: alienation in professionals and managers. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 342-360.
43. Korosec, R. L. ve Berman, E. M. (2006). Municipal support for social entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 448–462.
44. Kraus, S., Niemand, T., Halberstadt, J., Shaw, E. ve Syrjä, P. (2017). Social entrepreneurship orientation: development of a measurement scale. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(6), 977-997.
45. Kruse, P., Chipeta, E. M. ve Ueberschär, I. (2023). What keeps social entrepreneurs happy? exploring personality, work design, external support, and social ımpact as resources of social entrepreneurs’ mental well-being. Sustainability, 15(5), 4109.
46. Kümbül Güler, B. (2008). Sosyal girişimciliği etkileyen faktörlerin analizi [Doctoral dissertation, DEÜ Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü].
47. Light, P. C. (2006). Reshaping social entrepreneurship. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 46–51. Mair, J. ve Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
48. Martin, R. J. ve Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: the case for a definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring, 29–39.
49. Maslach, C. ve Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99-113.
50. Mort, G., Weerawardena, J. ve Carnegie, K. (2002). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualization and measurement. American Marketing Association Conference Proceedings, 13, 5.
51. Mottaz, C. J. (1981). Some determinants of work alienation. Sociological Quarterly, 22(4), 515- 529.
52. Nair, N. ve Vohra, N. (2009). Developing a new measure of work alienation. Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(3).
53. Nair, N. ve Vohra, N. (2010). An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision, 48(4), 600-615.
54. Neck, H., Brush, C. ve Allen, E. (2009). The landscape of social entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 52(1), 13-19.
55. Nicholls, A. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Palmer, C., Kraus, S., Kailer, N., Huber, L. ve Öner, Z. H. (2021). Entrepreneurial burnout: a systematic review and research map. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 43(3), 438-461.
57. Pangriya, R. (2019). Hidden aspects of social entrepreneurs’ life: a content analysis. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9, 1-19.
58. Park, N., Peterson, C. ve Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603-619.
59. Peredo, A. M. ve McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56–65.
60. Perrini, F. ve Vurro, C. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: Innovation and social change across theory and practice. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, &; K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
61. Prabhu, G. N. (1999). Social entrepreneurship leadership. Career Development International, 4(3), 140–145.
62. Roberts, D. ve Woods, C. (2005). Changing the world on a shoestring: the concept of social entrepreneurship. University of Auckland Business Review, 45–51.
63. Ruskin, J., Seymour, R. G. ve Webster, C. M. (2016). Why create value for others? an exploration of social entrepreneurial motives. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(4), 1015-1037.
64. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069.
65. Sánchez-García, J. C., Vargas-Morúa, G. ve Hernández-Sánchez, B. R. (2018). Entrepreneurs' well- being: a bibliometric review. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1696.
66. Satar, M. S. Ve Natasha, S. (2019). Individual social entrepreneurship orientation: towards development of a measurement scale. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 49-72.
67. Seelos, C. ve Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48, 241–246.
68. Sharir, M. ve M. Lerner (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 6–20.
69. Smallbone, D., M. Evans, I. Ekanem ve S. Butters. (2001). Researching social enterprise. Final Report to the small business service. Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University.
70. Stephan, U. (2018). Entrepreneurs’ mental health and well-being: a review and research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(3), 290-322.
71. Stephan, U. ve Drencheva, A. (2017). The person in social entrepreneurship: A systematic review of research on the social entrepreneurial personality. The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship, 205- 229.
72. Tan, L. P., Pham, L. X. ve Bui, T. T. (2021). Personality traits and social entrepreneurial intention: the mediating effect of perceived desirability and perceived feasibility. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 30(1), 56-80.
73. Teasdale, S. (2012). What’s in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 99-119.
74. Thompson, J. L. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15, 412–431.
75. Thompson, J., Alvy, G. ve Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship—a new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38, 328–338.
76. Veenhoven, R. (2008). Healthy happiness: effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. Journal of happiness studies, 9 (1), 449-469.
77. Waddock, S. A. ve Post, J. E. (1991). Social entrepreneurs and catalytic change. Public Administration Review, 393-401.
78. Waddock, S. A. ve Post, J. E. (1995). Catalytic alliances for social problem solving. Human Relations, 48(8), 951– 973.
79. Wiklund, J., Nikolaev, B., Shir, N., Foo, M. D. ve Bradley, S. (2019). Entrepreneurship and well- being: Past, present, and future. Journal Of Business Venturing, 34(4), 579-588.
80. Yunus, M. (2008). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: Public Affairs Books.
81. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O. ve Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532.