The Comparison of Measurements of the Wrist, Hand and Finger Parameters Between Female and Male

Yıl 2020, , 6 - 10, 26.03.2020

Atila Yoldaş , Mehmet Demir Elisa Çalışgan , Emre Atay , Esin Geçgil Mustafa Çiçek Tolga Ertekin Adem Doğaner

https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.599786

Öz

Objectives: The purpose of this
study was to compare measurements of the wrist, hand
and finger parameters between female and male.

Methods:
This randomized trial included 318  healthy participants  (n:210 female, n:108 male) aged 25 to 72
years as
a result of examination participated in the study. Tape measure, digital caliper with 0.01 sensitivity used in
the study were obtained at Kahramanmaraş Sütçü
Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Department
of Anatomy. The measurements taken from
the  participants were right and left
wristh circumference, breadth and  length,
palm breadth, length and fingers length.

Result:
Regarding the scores between female and male, no
statistically significant difference was found between the female and male in
terms of age and body mass index (BMI) parameters (p>0.05). In the
comparison analysis results of the measurements of wrist, hand and finger
parameters in female and male, statistically significant difference was found
in wrist circumference, breadth, length, palm breadth and length, fingers
length. The
points of all parameters of female were significantly lower than male
(p<0.05).

Conclusion:
As
a result of the study, statistically significant
difference was found between female and male in terms of right and left wrist,
hand and finger parameters.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wrist, Palm, Finger, Anthropology

Kaynakça

• 1. Phelps VR. Relative index finger length as a sex-influenced trait in man. Am J Hum Genet 1952;4(2):72–89. 2.
• 2. Manning JT, Scott D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reprod 1998;13 (11):3000–4.
• 3. Garrido VCE, Thompson TJU. Metric dimensions of the proximal phalanges of the human hand and their relationship to side, position, and asymmetry. Homo 2011;62(2):126–43.
• 4. Brown WM, Hines M, Fane BA, Breedlove SM. Maculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior 2002;42: 380–6.
• 5. Manning JT, Scott D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentration of testosterone, leutenizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction 1998;1311: 3000–4.
• 6. Manning JT, Taylor RP. Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 2001;22: 61–9.
• 7. Mc Fadden D, Bracht MS. The relative lengths and weights of metacarpals and metatarsals in baboons (papio hamadryas). Hormones and Behavior 2003:43;347–55.
• 8. Mazıcıoğlu MM. Büyüme gelişme izleminde kullanılan antropometrik ölçüm yöntemleri: Büyüme takibinin metodolojisi. Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi 2011;15 (3):101-8.
• 9. Duyar İ. Ankara’da yaşayan çocukların bazı antropometrik ölçülerinde 1950– 1986 yılları arasında gözlenen değişimler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 1995;12:1-13.
• 10. Duyar İ, Özener B. İnsanda Boy Uzunluğunun Evrimi ve Ergonomik Açıdan Önemi. University of Gaziantep Journal of Social Sciences. 2009;8 (1):63-75.
• 11. Krogman WM, İşcan MY. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. İllinois: Charles C Thomas; 1986.
• 12. Sen J, Kanchan T, Ghosh A, Mondal N, Krishan K. Estimation of Sex from Index and Ring Finger Lengths in an Indigenous Population of Eastern. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015;9(11):HC01-5.
• 13. Barrett CK, Case DT. Use of 2D: 4D Digit Ratios to Determine Sex. J Forensic Sci.2014;59(5):1315-20.
• 14. Case DT, Ross AH. Sex determination from hand and foot bone lengths. J Forensic Sci 2007;52(2):264–70.
• 15. Gupta S, Gupta V, Tyag N, Ettihree, Bhagat S, Dadu M, Anthwal N, Ashraf T. Index/Ring Finger Ratio, Hand and Foot Index:Gender Estimation Tools. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017;11(6):ZC73-7.
• 16. Gargi V, Prakash SM, Malik S, Nagaraju K, Goel S, Gupta S. Sexual dimorphism of foramen magnum between two different groups of Indian population: A cross-sectional cone –beam computed tomography study. J Forensic Sci Me 2018;4:150-5.
• 17. Kanchan T, Kumar GP. Index and ring finger ratio – a morphologic sex determinant in South-Indian children. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2010;6 (4):255–60.
• 18. Bailey AA, Hurd PL. Finger length ratio(2D:4D) correlates with physical aggresion in men but not women. Biological Psychology 2005;68:215-22.