The Effect Of Beclin 1, P53 Mutation, Ki-67 Proliferation İndex, Tumor Necrosis and Microvascular İnvasion On Prognosis İn Renal Cell Carcinomas and Their Relationship With Known Prognostic Parameters
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to help identify new prognostic markers in renal cell carcinomas (RCC), to show the role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of RCC and to shed light on new treatment modalities in RCC.
Material and Methods: Clinicopathological stages, tumor necrosis and microvascular invasion (MVI) were determined retrospectively and Beclin-1, Ki-67, and p53 were studied immunohistochemically.
Results: Tumor necrosis, MVI, Ki-67, and p53 in RCCs were positively correlated with Fuhrman nuclear grade and pathologic tumor stage, while Beclin-1 was only associated with nuclear grade. MVI and Ki-67 were associated with distant organ and lymph node metastasis. Ki-67 and necrosis correlated positively with p53 and Beclin-1 expression, but not with MVI. Beclin-1 were positively correlated necrosis, but not with p53 and MVI. p53, Ki-67 and MVI were negatively correlated with survival, while the effect of Beclin -1 and necrosis on survival couldn’t be demonstrated. Conclusion: Ki-67, p53, and MVI in RCCs are prognostic parameters with effects on survival. Although Beclin-1 was not a prognostic parameter associated with survival, its expression in tumor tissue was found to be increased. At the same time, there is less staining in non-tumor renal parenchyma. Beclin-1 is a marker of autophagy and is thought to be involved in RCC pathogenesis rather than its prognostic significance.
Keywords
References
- 1- Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.1, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No.11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on 12.09.2018.
- 2- Srigley JR, Zhou M, Allan R, Amin MB, Campbell SC, Chang A, et al. Protocol for the Examination of Specimens from Patients with Invasive Carcinoma of Renal Tubular Origin. College of American Pathologists (CAP). 2017.
- 3- Lang H, Lindner V, Letourneux H, Martin M, Saussine C, Jacqmin D. Prognostic value of microscopic venous invasion in renal cell carcinoma: long-term follow-up. Eur Urol. 2004; 46: 331–335.
- 4- Delahunt B, Cheville JC, Martignoni G, Humphrey PA, Magi-Galluzzi C, McKenney J, et al. Members of the ISUP Renal Tumor Panel. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37: 1490-1504.
- 5- Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003; 27: 612–624.
- 6- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11-30.
- 7- Hu Y. Jahangiri A, Delay M, and Aghi MK. Tumor cell autophagy as an adaptive response mediating resistance to treatments such as antiangiogenic therapy. Cancer Res. 2012; 72: 4294–4299.
- 8- Chen N and Debnath J. Autophagy and tumorigenesis. FEBS Lett. 2010; 584: 1427–1435.
- 9- Kumar V, Abbas AK and Aster AJ. The Cellular Responses to Stress and Toxic Insults: Adaptation, Injury, and Death, Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease Ninth Edition (p.60-61). Philadelphia: Elsevier. 2015.
- 10- Jung CH, Jun CB, Ro SH, Kim YM, Otto NM, Cao J, et al. ULK-Atg13-FIP200 complexes mediate mTOR signaling to the autophagy machinery. Mol Biol Cell. 2009; 20: 1992–2003.