Research Article

Evaluation of Regulatory T-Cells (Tregs) in Benign Prostatic Pathologies: A Pilot Study

Volume: 16 Number: 1 February 8, 2021
Erhan Ateş *, Akın Amasyalı , Erman Oryaşın , İrfan Yavaşoğlu , Mustafa Yılmaz , Bülent Bozdoğan , Haluk Erol
EN TR

Evaluation of Regulatory T-Cells (Tregs) in Benign Prostatic Pathologies: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the number and function of regulatory T (Treg) cells in peripheral blood and prostate tissues of patients with histopathologically diagnosed benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and asymptomatic chronic prostatitis. Material and Methods: Blood and histopathological data of 19 patients (BPH=10, ACP=9) that underwent transurethral prostate resection were evaluated. Treg cell count in peripheral blood and prostatic tissue with flowcytometry, Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) expression in prostatic tissue by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and IL-17 measurement in blood samples with ELISA were performed. Results: Flowcytometric analyses showed that mean CD4+T cell count and mean FOXP3 levels in both peripheral blood (CD4+T, p= 0.752; FOXP3, p= 1.000) and prostate tissue (CD4+T, p= 0.458; FOXP3, p= 0.590) were higher in the BPH group compared to the chronic prostatitis group. However this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, the mean blood IL-17 levels were also higher in BPH groups, but the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.870). The PCR analyses showed that mean FOXP3 gene expression in the tissue was higher in the chronic prostate group, but again there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p= 0.116). Conclusion: Since no statistically significant difference was found between BPH and chronic prostatitis in terms of Treg cell number and function in peripheral blood and prostatic tissue, our study supports the thesis that both these pathologies could be autoimmune inflammatory diseases.

Keywords

Autoimmunity , Inflammation , Benign Prostate Hyperplasia , Chronic Prostatitis , FOXP3 , Regulatory T cells

References

  1. 1. Delongchamps NB, de la Roza G, Chandan V, Jones R, Sunheimer R, Threatte G, Jumbelic M, Haas GP. Evaluation of prostatitis in autopsied prostates--is chronic inflammation more associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia or cancer? J Urol 2008; 179:1736-40.
  2. 2. Potts JM: Prospective identification of National Institutes of Health category IV prostatitis in men with elevated prostate specific antigen. J Urol 2000; 164:1550-3.
  3. 3. Nickel JC, Roehrborn CG, O’Leary MP, Bostwick DG, Somerville MC, Rittmaster RS. Examination of the relationship between symptoms of prostatitis and histologic inflammation: baseline data from the REDUCE chemoprevention trial. J Urol 2007;178:896-901.
  4. 4. Nickel JC, Downey J, Young I, Boag S. Asymptomatic inflammation and/or infection in benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 1999; 84:976-81.
  5. 5. De Marzo AM, Platz EA, Sutcliffe S, Xu J, Grönberg H, Drake CG, Nakai Y, Isaacs WB, Nelson WG. Inflammation in prostate carcinogenesis. NatRevCancer 2007; 7: 256–69.
  6. 6. Bostwick DG, de la Roza G, Dundore P, Corica FA, Iczkowski KA. Intraepithelial and stromal lymphocytes in the normal humanprostate. Prostate 2003; 55: 187–93.
  7. 7. Shevach EM. Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 2009;30:636–45
  8. 8. Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising CD4+ regulatory T cells for immunologic self tolerans and negative control of immune responses. Ann Rev Immunol 2004;22:531-62.
  9. 9. Valenci A, Lipsky PE. CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in autoimmune diseases. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Nov;3(11):619-26.
  10. 10. Steiner GE, Stix U, Handisurya A. Cytokine expression pattern in benign prostatic hyperplasia infiltrating T cells and impact of lymphocytic infiltration on cytokine mRNA profile in prostatic tissue. Lab Invest 2003;83:1131– 46.
AMA
1.Ateş E, Amasyalı A, Oryaşın E, et al. Evaluation of Regulatory T-Cells (Tregs) in Benign Prostatic Pathologies: A Pilot Study. KSU Medical Journal. 2021;16(1):1-6. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.820604