Tüp, İkiz ve Üçüz Bebeklerin TEOAE ve Latans Sürelerinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2018, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 72 - 76, 15.11.2018

Sıdıka Deniz Yalım

https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.418312

Abstract

Amaç: Tüp
bebek, ikiz ve üçüz bebeklerin TEOAE(transient evoked otoakustik emisyon)
ve latans sürelerinin karşılaştırılması.

Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Yenidoğan
işitme taraması yapılan yaşları 6 gün ile 150 gün arasında değişen 66 bebeğin
(32 kız, 34 erkek) TEOAE ve latans süreleri karşılaştırıldı.

Bulgular: Tüm
hastaların sol ve sağ kulak latans süreleri karşılaştırıldığında
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark olduğu bulundu. Tüp bebek ve ikiz bebeklerin
sol ve sağ kulaktan elde edilen 4 kHz TEOAE’lerinde fark olduğu bulundu.

Sonuç: Sağ kulakta otoakustik emisyonlar
soldan daha fazla elde edildi. Tüp bebekler normal bebeklerle kıyaslandığında
sağ ve sol kulak latans süreleri birbirinden farklı idi. Bu farklılıklar
koklear fizyoloji, koklea matürasyonu, genler veya doğum öncesi dönemle
ilişkili olabilir.

Keywords

yenidoğan, işitme tarama, TEOAE, latans süresi

Comparison of TEOAE and Latency Times of Tube Babies, Twins and Triplets

Abstract

Objective:
To
compare the TEOAE(transient evoked otoacoustic emission) and the latency times
of the tube babies, the twin and the triplet babies.

Materials
and methods: The TEOAE and the latency times of 66
babies (32 female, 34 male) who had newborn hearing screening, whose ages
between 6 days to 150 days, were compared.

Results:
When the left and the right ear latency times of  all of the patients were compared a
statistically significant difference was found. The 4 kHz TEOAEs of the left
and the right ear of the tube babies and the twins were found different.

Conclusion:
Otoacoustic emissions were gained more from the right ear than the left. When
the tube babies were compared with the normal babies the left and the right ear
latency times were different from each other. These differences may be due to the
cochlear physiology, the cochlea maturation, the genes or the antenatal period.

Keywords

newborn, hearing screening, TEOAE, latency time

References

• 1. Jakuhimura J, Kabatova Z, Pawlowcinova G, Profant M. Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73(4):607-12.2. Prieve BA, Hancur-Bucci CA, Preston JL. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life. Ear Hear 2009;30(3):330-9.
• 3. Jedrzejczak WW, Hatzopoulos S, Martini A, Blinowska KJ. Otoacoustic emissions latency difference between fulterm and preterm neonates. Hearing Research 2007;231:54-62.
• 4. Moleti A, Sisto R, Tognola G, Parazzini M, Ravazzini P, Grandori F. Otoacoustic emission latency, cochlear tuning, and hearing functionality in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 2005 2005;118(3):1576-1584.5. Mc Fadden D, Loehlin JC. On the heritability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: A twin study. Hearing Research 1995;85(1-2):181-98.
• 6. Thornton AR, Marotta N, Kennedy CR. The order of testing effect i otoacoustic emissions and its consequences for sex and ear differences in neonates. Hearing Research 2003;184:123-130.7. Tognola G, Parazzini M, Jager P, Brienesse P, Ravazzani P, Grandori F. Cochlear maturation and otoacoustic emissions in preterm infants: a time-frequency approach. Hearing Research 2005;199:71-80.8. Keefe DH, Bulen JC, Arehart KH, Burns EM.Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults.J Acoust Soc Am 94(5):2617-38.