-

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the knowledge of people about musicotherapy, the methods they use to deal with stress, the kind of music they listen and the relationship between musicotherapy and socioeconomic features. Methods: This cross-sectional study is conducted in Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital and Istanbul Medeniyet University Göztepe Training and Research Hospital between November 2011 and January 2012. One hundred two volunteers, in different socioeconomic and education status, working in these hospitals were included the study. The data (socioeconomic, sociocultural status, knowledge about musicotherapy and subquestions) were collected with a questionnaire. SPSS for Windows 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: In 102 volunteers (68 females, 34 males) 60 people (58.8%) were university graduate. Sixty three (61.8%) people spend their time with friends for managing stress. In our study 74 (72.5%) volunteers have heard about musicotherapy and 95 (93.1%) of them think that it can be used in medical treatment like autizm, oncologic and psychiatric diseases. The most known music kind for musicotherapy was “sufi” music (n=69, 67.6%). Socioeconomic status and gender were not statistically important factors for the awareness of musicotherapy and its use for some diseases (p>0.05). Education level was statistically important factors for the awareness of musicotherapy and its use for some diseases (p=0.003). Conclusion: In this study we learned that although people do not know everything about musicotherapy, they look optimistically and curious for therapeutic effect of this method. We need to practice other studies to see the detailed effects of musicotherapy

Keywords

• Musicotherapy, Questionnaire, Knowledge, People

Müzikoterapi Hakkında Ne Biliyoruz?

Abstract

Müzikoterapi Hakkında Ne Biliyoruz?

Keywords

• Müzikoterapi, Anket, Bilgi, İnsanlar

References

1. Khorshid L, Akın E. Mekanik ventilatöre bağlı hastalarda anksiyete yönetiminde müzik terapinin yeri. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Dergisi 2007; 11(2): 83-8.
2. Esch T, Guarna M, Bianchi E, Zhu W, Stefano GB. Commonalities in the central nervous system's involvement with complementary medical therapies: limbic morphinergic processes. Med Sci Monit 2004; 10(6): 6-17.
3. Aydın E. Müzik terapi: işleyiş ve yaklaşımlar. İstanbul: Sanat Psikoterapileri Derneği, 2013 http://www.sanatpsikoterapileridernegi.org/uploads/6/4/5/5/6455557/aydin_esma_muzik_terapi_isleyis_ve_ yaklasimlar.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 24.02.2014).
4. Ak AŞ. Avrupa ve Türk İslam medeniyetinde müzikle tedavi tarihi gelişim ve uygulamaları. Konya: Konya Öz Eğitim Yayınevi; 1997; 269.
5. Somakcı P. Türklerde müzikle tedavi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2003; 2(15): 131-40.
6. Chlan LL. Relationship between two anxiety instruments in patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48(5): 493-9.
7. Daykin N, Bunt L, McClean S. Music and healing in cancer care: a survey of supportive care providers. The Arts in Psychotherapy 2006; 33(5): 402-13.
8. Malkoç T, Ceylan F. Okul öncesi dönem işitme engellilerde müzik eğitimi ile çocukların gelişim özellikleri üzerine terapötik bir çalışma. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2013; 2(1): 117-26.

9. Yıldırım S, Gürkan A. Müziğin kemoterapi yan etkilerine ve kaygı düzeyine etkisi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 2007; 8(1): 37-45.
10. Koldaş Doğan Ş, Sonel Tur B, Dilek L, Küçükdeveci A. Single music therapy session reduces anxiety in patients with stroke. J PMR Sci 2011; 14(1): 12-5.
11. Dündar SA. Pediatri kliniğindeki hemşire ve doktorların müziğin klinikte kullanımı hakkındaki düşünceleri. ADÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 12(3): 11-5.