Research Article

Are the conventional risk factors still valid for acute myeloid leukemia patients?

Volume: 12 Number: 1 March 2, 2020
EN

Are the conventional risk factors still valid for acute myeloid leukemia patients?

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the survival data of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and to determine the risk factors that can be easily evaluated.

Method: A retrospective analysis  was made of the AML patients admitted to our center between 2009-2018. Demographic data and disease data were analyzed and response rates, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated. Factors affecting survival were determined using Cox-regression analysis.

Results: A total of 119 patients were included in the study during the 9-year study period. Of these, 21 patients had secondary AML and 11 had acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The mean follow-up period was 12.43 ± 15.63 months. OS of all patients was 9.20 months and PFS was 7.23 months. Age and leukocyte count at the time of diagnosis were found to have a significant impact on both OS and PFS (p <0.05).

Conclusion: In addition to genetic and molecular features, which are expensive and not easily available, the age and leukocyte count of AML patients remain important as prognostic factors.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Dohner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, Burnett AK, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010;115(3):453-74.
  2. 2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2012;62(1):10-29.
  3. 3. Ferrara F, Schiffer CA. Acute myeloid leukaemia in adults. Lancet (London, England). 2013;381(9865):484-95.
  4. 4. Padilha SL, Souza EJ, Matos MC, Domino NR. Acute myeloid leukemia: survival analysis of patients at a university hospital of Parana. Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia. 2015;37(1):21-7.
  5. 5. Rollig C, Ehninger G. How I treat hyperleukocytosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015;125(21):3246-52.
  6. 6. Grimwade D. The changing paradigm of prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukaemia. Best practice & research Clinical haematology. 2012;25(4):419-25.
  7. 7. Liersch R, Muller-Tidow C, Berdel WE, Krug U. Prognostic factors for acute myeloid leukaemia in adults--biological significance and clinical use. British journal of haematology. 2014;165(1):17-38.
  8. 8. Duployez N, Willekens C, Marceau-Renaut A, Boudry-Labis E, Preudhomme C. Prognosis and monitoring of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: current and emerging factors. Expert review of hematology. 2015;8(1):43-56.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 2, 2020

Submission Date

April 5, 2019

Acceptance Date

January 15, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 12 Number: 1

APA
Yıldız, A., Maral, S., Albayrak, M., Pala, Ç., Cömert, P., Afacan Öztürk, H. B., & Şahin, O. (2020). Are the conventional risk factors still valid for acute myeloid leukemia patients? Konuralp Medical Journal, 12(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.549666
AMA
1.Yıldız A, Maral S, Albayrak M, et al. Are the conventional risk factors still valid for acute myeloid leukemia patients? Konuralp Medical Journal. 2020;12(1):5-11. doi:10.18521/ktd.549666
Chicago
Yıldız, Abdulkerim, Senem Maral, Murat Albayrak, et al. 2020. “Are the Conventional Risk Factors Still Valid for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients?”. Konuralp Medical Journal 12 (1): 5-11. https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.549666.
EndNote
Yıldız A, Maral S, Albayrak M, Pala Ç, Cömert P, Afacan Öztürk HB, Şahin O (March 1, 2020) Are the conventional risk factors still valid for acute myeloid leukemia patients? Konuralp Medical Journal 12 1 5–11.
IEEE
[1]A. Yıldız et al., “Are the conventional risk factors still valid for acute myeloid leukemia patients?”, Konuralp Medical Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 5–11, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.18521/ktd.549666.
ISNAD
Yıldız, Abdulkerim - Maral, Senem - Albayrak, Murat - Pala, Çiğdem - Cömert, Pınar - Afacan Öztürk, Hacer Berna - Şahin, Osman. “Are the Conventional Risk Factors Still Valid for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients?”. Konuralp Medical Journal 12/1 (March 1, 2020): 5-11. https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.549666.
JAMA
1.Yıldız A, Maral S, Albayrak M, Pala Ç, Cömert P, Afacan Öztürk HB, Şahin O. Are the conventional risk factors still valid for acute myeloid leukemia patients? Konuralp Medical Journal. 2020;12:5–11.
MLA
Yıldız, Abdulkerim, et al. “Are the Conventional Risk Factors Still Valid for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients?”. Konuralp Medical Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, Mar. 2020, pp. 5-11, doi:10.18521/ktd.549666.
Vancouver
1.Abdulkerim Yıldız, Senem Maral, Murat Albayrak, Çiğdem Pala, Pınar Cömert, Hacer Berna Afacan Öztürk, Osman Şahin. Are the conventional risk factors still valid for acute myeloid leukemia patients? Konuralp Medical Journal. 2020 Mar. 1;12(1):5-11. doi:10.18521/ktd.549666

https://mjl.clarivate.com://search-results?issn=1309-3878&hide_exact_match_fl=true&utm_source=mjl&utm_medium=share-by-link&utm_campaign=search-results-share-this-journal

 

EBSCO - Research Databases, EBooks, Discovery Service

5bd95eb5f3a21.jpg