Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme

Tasalı N

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 33 - 38, 01.08.2010

Tasalı N

Abstract

References

1. Kaur H, Silverman PM, Iyer RB, Verschraegen CF, Eifel PJ, Charnsangavej C. Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Cervical Carcinoma. AJR 2003; 180:1621-1631
2. Friedenberg RM. The 21 st century: the age of screening. Radiology 2002;223:1-47
3. Hricak H, Powell CB, Yu KK, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis Radiology 1996;198: 403-409,
4. Hricak H. First Open Trial of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network: Proper Imaging Approach for Invasive Cervical Cancer . Radiology 2002;225:634-635
5. Yu KK, Hricak H, Subak LL, Zaloudek CJ, Powell CB. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin- echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging. AJR 1998;171: 707-711
6. Scheidler J, Heuck AF, Steinborn M, Kimmig R, Reiser MF. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression. Radiology 1998; 206:125-129,
7. Nicolet V, Carignan L, Bourdon F, Prosmanne O. MR Imaging of Cervical Carcinoma: A Practical Staging Approach. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1539ñ1549
8. OkamotoY, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y. MR Imaging of the Uterine Cervix: Imaging-Pathologic Correlation. RadioGraphics 2003; 23:425ñ445
9. Szklaruk J, Tamm EP, Choi H, Varavithya V. MR Imaging of Common and Uncommon Large Pelvic Masses. Radiographics 2003;23:403-424
10. Hawighorst H, Dynamic MR Imaging in Cervical Carcinoma. Radiology 1999;213:617-618
11. Hricak H, Yu KK. Radiology in invasive cervical cancer. AJR 1996;167:1101-1108.
12. Harpreet K, Pannu HK, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT Evaluation of Cervical Cancer: Spectrum of Disease. Radiographics. 2001;21:1155-1168
13. Walsh JW, Goplerud DR. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma. AJR 1981;137:997 ñ1003
14. Yang WT, Lam WWM, Yu MY, Cheung TH, Metreweli C. Comparison of Dynamic Helical CT and Dynamic MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Carcinoma. AJR 2000; 175:759-766
15. Roy C, Le Bras Y, Mangold L, et al. Small pelvic lymph node metastases: evaluation with MR imaging. Clin Radiol. 1997;52(6):437-40. 16. Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, Subak L, Segal L. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis JAMA 1997;278(13):1
17. Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Bruan C, Vogelgesang D, et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology 2001; 218:776 ñ782
18. Fulcher AS, O'Sullivan SG, Segreti EM, Kavanagh SG. Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma: Typical and Atypical Manifestations. Radiographics 1999;19:S103-S116
19. Manfredi R, Maresca G, Smaniotto D, et al. Cervical cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy: MR imaging assessment. Radiology 1998;209(3):819-824
20. Peppercorn PD, Jeyarajah AR, Woolas R, et al. Role of MR Imaging in the Selection of Patients with Early Cervical Carcinoma for Fertility-preserving Surgery: Initial Experience. Radiology 1999;212:395-399. 21. Hoe LV, Vanbeckevoort D, Oyen R, Itzlinger U, Vergote I. Cervical Carcinoma: Optimized Local Staging with Intravaginal Contrast- enhanced MR Imaging- Preliminary Results. Radiology. 1999;213:608-611

Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 33 - 38, 01.08.2010

Tasalı N

Abstract

Serviks kanseri jinekeolojik kanserler arasýnda endometrium ve over kanserlerinin ardýndan üçüncü sýklýkta görülmektedir. Spesifik tarama testinin kullanýma girmesiyle mortalitesi eski yýllara göre oldukça azalan serviks kanseri hala önemini korumaktadýr. Ýnvaziv serviks kanserinde klinik evreleme International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics planlanmasýnda baºlýca dayanak olarak kabul edilmiºtir. Ýn situ ve evre IA serviks karsinomunda görüntüleme bulgusu mevcut deðildir. Bu makalede diðer evrelerde tümörün kendisinin, nodal durumun, tedavi cevabýnýn ve rekürrenslerin deðerlendirilmesinde Manyetik rezonans, bilgisayarlý tomografi ve ultrasonografi gibi geliºmiº görüntüleme yöntemlerinin rolü tartýºýlacaktýr

Keywords

Serviks kanseri, manyetik rezonans, radyoloji

References

1. Kaur H, Silverman PM, Iyer RB, Verschraegen CF, Eifel PJ, Charnsangavej C. Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Cervical Carcinoma. AJR 2003; 180:1621-1631
2. Friedenberg RM. The 21 st century: the age of screening. Radiology 2002;223:1-47
3. Hricak H, Powell CB, Yu KK, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis Radiology 1996;198: 403-409,
4. Hricak H. First Open Trial of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network: Proper Imaging Approach for Invasive Cervical Cancer . Radiology 2002;225:634-635
5. Yu KK, Hricak H, Subak LL, Zaloudek CJ, Powell CB. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin- echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging. AJR 1998;171: 707-711
6. Scheidler J, Heuck AF, Steinborn M, Kimmig R, Reiser MF. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression. Radiology 1998; 206:125-129,
7. Nicolet V, Carignan L, Bourdon F, Prosmanne O. MR Imaging of Cervical Carcinoma: A Practical Staging Approach. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1539ñ1549
8. OkamotoY, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y. MR Imaging of the Uterine Cervix: Imaging-Pathologic Correlation. RadioGraphics 2003; 23:425ñ445
9. Szklaruk J, Tamm EP, Choi H, Varavithya V. MR Imaging of Common and Uncommon Large Pelvic Masses. Radiographics 2003;23:403-424
10. Hawighorst H, Dynamic MR Imaging in Cervical Carcinoma. Radiology 1999;213:617-618
11. Hricak H, Yu KK. Radiology in invasive cervical cancer. AJR 1996;167:1101-1108.
12. Harpreet K, Pannu HK, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT Evaluation of Cervical Cancer: Spectrum of Disease. Radiographics. 2001;21:1155-1168
13. Walsh JW, Goplerud DR. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma. AJR 1981;137:997 ñ1003
14. Yang WT, Lam WWM, Yu MY, Cheung TH, Metreweli C. Comparison of Dynamic Helical CT and Dynamic MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Carcinoma. AJR 2000; 175:759-766
15. Roy C, Le Bras Y, Mangold L, et al. Small pelvic lymph node metastases: evaluation with MR imaging. Clin Radiol. 1997;52(6):437-40. 16. Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, Subak L, Segal L. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis JAMA 1997;278(13):1
17. Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Bruan C, Vogelgesang D, et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology 2001; 218:776 ñ782
18. Fulcher AS, O'Sullivan SG, Segreti EM, Kavanagh SG. Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma: Typical and Atypical Manifestations. Radiographics 1999;19:S103-S116
19. Manfredi R, Maresca G, Smaniotto D, et al. Cervical cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy: MR imaging assessment. Radiology 1998;209(3):819-824
20. Peppercorn PD, Jeyarajah AR, Woolas R, et al. Role of MR Imaging in the Selection of Patients with Early Cervical Carcinoma for Fertility-preserving Surgery: Initial Experience. Radiology 1999;212:395-399. 21. Hoe LV, Vanbeckevoort D, Oyen R, Itzlinger U, Vergote I. Cervical Carcinoma: Optimized Local Staging with Intravaginal Contrast- enhanced MR Imaging- Preliminary Results. Radiology. 1999;213:608-611

There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	Turkish
Journal Section	Articles
Authors	Tasalı N This is me
Publication Date	August 1, 2010
Published in Issue	Year 2010 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA	N, T. (2010). Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme. Konuralp Medical Journal, 2(2), 33-38.
AMA	N T. Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme. Konuralp Medical Journal. August 2010;2(2):33-38.
Chicago	N, Tasalı. “Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme”. Konuralp Medical Journal 2, no. 2 (August 2010): 33-38.
EndNote	N T (August 1, 2010) Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme. Konuralp Medical Journal 2 2 33–38.
IEEE	T. N, “Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme”, Konuralp Medical Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 33–38, 2010.
ISNAD	N, Tasalı. “Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme”. Konuralp Medical Journal 2/2 (August 2010), 33-38.
JAMA	N T. Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2010;2:33–38.
MLA	N, Tasalı. “Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme”. Konuralp Medical Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, 2010, pp. 33-38.
Vancouver	N T. Serviks Kanserinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme. Konuralp Medical Journal. 2010;2(2):33-8.