Conference Paper

A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

Volume: 4 Number: 1 April 8, 2015
EN TR

A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

Abstract

This study examines the secondary literature on Max Weber’s writings on Islam and the Ottoman Empire. It demarcates approaches prevalent in the secondary literature. Three basic themes are apparent: - Section a) concentrates on authors who applied Weber’s concepts of patrimonialism and bureaucracy to non-Ottoman countries, such as Maslovski (on the Soviet bureaucracy) and Eisenberg (on China). - Section b) focuses on authors who studied the Ottoman Empire utilizing non-Weberianabove all Durkheimian and Marxian theories and methods. The studies by Immanuel Wallerstein (world systems theory) and his Turkish colleagues on the Ottoman Empire, as well as the neo-Marxian writings of Perry Anderson and Barrington Moore, will be evaluated. Studies on the Ottoman Empire and its socio-political transformation indebted to Durkheim (S. N. Eisendtadt, Ziya Gökalp, and Niyazi Berkes) will be discussed. - Section c) concentrates on authors who studied the Ottoman Empire using Weber’s terminology and concepts, such as Haim Gerber, Halil Inalcik, and Şerif Mardin

Keywords

Max Weber, Ottoman Empire, Ottoman Studies, patrimonialism, bureaucracy

References

  1. ANDERSON, Perry. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso, 1979.
  2. ANDERSON, Perry, Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: Verso, 1996.
  3. BERKES, Niyazi. The Development of Secularism in Turkey. Montreal: McGill University Press, 1964.
  4. EATON, Richard M. “Islamization in Late Medieval Bengal: The Relevance of Max Weber.” In Max Weber and Islam. Ed. Toby Huff and Wolfgang Schluchter. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1999: 163-82.
  5. EISENBERG, Andrew. “Weberian Patrimonialism and Imperial Chinese History.” Theory and Society 27 (1998): 83-102
  6. EISENSTADT, S.Noah. The Political Systems of Empires. London: Free Press of Glencoe, 1963.
  7. EISENSTADT, S.Noah, “Weber’s Analysis of Islam and the Specific Pattern of Islamic Civilization.” In Max Weber and Islam. Ed. Toby Huff and Wolfgang Schluchter. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1999: 273 - 94.
  8. GERBER, Haim. State, Society, and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1994.
  9. GÖKALP, Ziya. The Principles of Turkism. Tr. (from Turkish) Robert Devereux. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1968.
  10. HAMILTON, Gary, G. “Patriarchalism in Imperial China and Western Europe-A Revision of Weber’s Sociology of Domination.” Theory and Society 13 (1984): 393-425.
APA
Mazman, İ. (2015). A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 7-18. https://izlik.org/JA37KD62AU
AMA
1.Mazman İ. A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE. KUSBD. 2015;4(1):7-18. https://izlik.org/JA37KD62AU
Chicago
Mazman, İbrahim. 2015. “A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 4 (1): 7-18. https://izlik.org/JA37KD62AU.
EndNote
Mazman İ (April 1, 2015) A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 4 1 7–18.
IEEE
[1]İ. Mazman, “A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE”, KUSBD, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7–18, Apr. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA37KD62AU
ISNAD
Mazman, İbrahim. “A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 4/1 (April 1, 2015): 7-18. https://izlik.org/JA37KD62AU.
JAMA
1.Mazman İ. A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE. KUSBD. 2015;4:7–18.
MLA
Mazman, İbrahim. “A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 1, Apr. 2015, pp. 7-18, https://izlik.org/JA37KD62AU.
Vancouver
1.İbrahim Mazman. A REVIEW of WEBERIAN STUDIES ON THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE. KUSBD [Internet]. 2015 Apr. 1;4(1):7-18. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA37KD62AU