Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite

İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Year 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 79 - 92, 20.02.2016

Arzu Taşdelen-karçkay , Orkide Bakalım , Canan Yörük

Abstract

İş-Aile Çatışmasını Yönetme Öz-Yeterliği Ölçeği (İAÇ-ÖÖ) bireylerin iş ve aile rolleri arasındaki çatışmayı yönetme becerilerine yönelik inançlarını ölçmek için Cinamon (2003) tarafından İsrail’de geliştirilmiştir. Ölçek, Hennesy & Lent (2008) tarafından İngilizce’ye uyarlanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, İAÇ-ÖÖ’nin güvenirliğini ve faktör yapısını incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Uşak İl’inde kamu ve özel sektörde çalışan 224 kadın oluşturmuştur. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini değerlendirmek için, Cinamon (2003) ve Hennesy & Lent (2008)’in modelleri doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde model karşılaştırması yapılarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, Türk örneklemi için en uygun modelin Hennessy & Lent (2008)’in olduğunu göstermektedir. Ölçeğin güvenirliği Cronbach’s alfa (α) ve bileşik güvenirlik (CRC) katsayıları hesaplanarak bulunmuştur.

Keywords

iş-aile çatışması iş-aile çatışmasını yönetme öz-yeterliği model karşılaştırma

References

  • Aile, T. B., & Müdürlüğü, S. A. G. (2006). TC Başbakanlık Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TUİK). Social and Cultural Activities. Aile Yapısı Araştırması, 20-5.
  • Arslan, M. (2012). İş-aile ve aile-iş çatışmalarının kadın çalışanların iş doyumları üzerindeki etkisi. Bilim ve Toplum, 2(3), 99-113.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
  • Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family. American Psychologist, 56(10), 781.
  • Bedeian, A. G., Burke, B. G., & Moffett, R. G. (1988). Outcomes of work-family conflict among married male and female professionals. Journal of management, 14(3), 475-491.
  • Burke, R. J., & Greenglass, E. R. (1999). Work-family conflict, spouse support, and nurse-staff well-being during organizational restructuring. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 327-336.
  • Byrne, B. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169-198.
  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a mul tidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational behavior, 56(2), 249-276.
  • Carlson, D.S. & Perrewe, PL. (1999). The role of social support in the stressor - strain relationship: An examination of work-family conflict. Journal of Management, 25 (4), 513-541.
  • Cinamon, G. R. (2003). Work-family conflict self-efficacy and career plans of young adults. Teac Tea Edu, 21, 365-378.
  • Cinamon, R. G. (2006). Anticipated work-family conflict: Effects of gender, self-efficacy, and family background. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(3), 202.
  • Cinamon, R. G. & Rich, Y. (2002). Profiles of attribution of importance to life roles and their impor tance for the work-family conflict. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49 (2), 212-220.
  • Duxbury, L. & Higgins, C. (2001). Work Life Balance In The New Millennium: Where are we? Where we need to go? CPNR Discussion paper (W/12) October, Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
  • Dursun, S. (2014). Kadın Çalışanların Yaşamış Oldukları İş Aile Yaşamı Çatışmasının İş Ve Yaşam Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3).
  • Erdwins, C. J., Buffardi, L. C., Casper,W J., & O’Brien, A. S. (2001). The relationship of women’s role strain to social support, role satisfaction, and self-efficacy. Family Relations, 50, 230-239.
  • Eyüboğlu, A., Özar, Ş. ve Tanrıöver, H.T. (2000). Kentlerde Yaşayan Kadınların İş Yaşamına Katılım Sorunlarının Sosyo-ekonomik ve Kültürel Boyutları. Başbakanlık K.S.S.G.M. Yayınları, Ankara: Cem Web Ofset.
  • Eby, L. T., Casper,W J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005).Work and family research in IO/OB: Content Analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124-197.
  • Frone, M, R, (2000), Work-femily conflict and employee psychiatric disorders: The national comor bidity study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 888-89.
  • Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In J. C. Quick,&L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occu pational Health Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Frone, M.R., Russell, M. & Cooper, M.L. (1997). Relation of work-family conflict to health outco mes: A four-year longitudinal study of employed parents. Journal of Occupational and Organi zational Psychology, 70, 325-335.
  • Greenhaus, J.H. & Beutell, N.J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10 (1), 76-88.
  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Bass, B. L. (2003). Work, family, and mental health: Testing different models of work-family, Int. Jounal of Marriage and Family, 65, 248-261.
  • Gutek, B.A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (4), 560-568.
  • Hennessy, K. (2005). Work-family Conflict Self-efficacy: a Scale Validation Study (Doctoral disser tation).
  • Hennessy, K. D., & Lent, R. W. (2008). Self-efficacy for managing work-family conflict: Validating the English language version of a Hebrew scale. Journal of Career Assessment. 16(3), 370-383.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1991). Aile İçinde Kadın-Erkek Rolleri. Türk Aile Ansiklopedisi. Ankara: Cilt 3, T.C. Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu. Ankara: Türkiye Yazarlar Birliği Vakfı.
  • Judge, T. A., Ilies, R., & Scott, B. A. (2006). Work-family conflict and emotions: Effects at work and at home. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 779-814.
  • Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge.
  • Kossek, E.E. & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relati onship: A review and directions for organizational behavior - human resources research. Jour nal of Applied Psychology, 83 (2), 139-149
  • Lu, L., Cooper, C. L., Kao, S. F., Chang, T. T., Allen, T. D., Lapierre, L. M. & Spector, P E. (2010). Cross-cultural differences on work-to-family conflict and role satisfaction: A Taiwanese-British comparison. Human Resource Management, 49(1), 67-85.
  • Matthews, L. S., Gonger, R. D., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (1996). Work-family conflict and marital qua lity: Mediating processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 62-79.
  • Matsui, T., Ohsawa, T., & Onglatco, M. L. (1995). Work-family conflict and the stress-buffering ef fects of husband support and coping behavior among Japanese married working women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(2), 178-192.
  • Moya, M., Exposito, F., & Ruiz, J. (2000). Close relationships, gender, and career salience. Sex Ro les, 42(9-10), 825-846.
  • Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689 725.
  • Netemeyer, R.G., Boles, J.S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work - family conflict and family - work conflict scales, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (4), 400-410.
  • Noor, N. M. (2002). Work-family conflict, locus of control, and women’s well-being: Tests of alterna tive pathways. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 645-662.
  • Parasuraman, S., & Simmers, C. A. (2001). Type of employment, work-family conflict and well-being: a comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 551-568.
  • Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and decisions at the familyQ work interfa ce. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1011-1039.
  • Rantanen, J., Pulkkinen, L., & Kinnunen, U. (2005). The big five personality dimensions, work family conflict, and psychological distress: A longitudinal view. Journal of Individual Differen ces, 26, 155-166.
  • Raykoy, T. & Marcoulides, G.A. (2006). A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling.
  • Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, USA
  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equa tion modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A Review, The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323-337
  • T.C. Başbakanlık Yayınları (2000). Kentlerde Kadınların İş Yaş amlarına Katılım Sorunlarının Sosyo-ekonomik ve Kültürel Boyutları. Ankara; Cem Web Ofset.
  • Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work family experience: Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 108-130.

The Self-efficacy for Work–Family Conflict Management Scale (SE-WFC): Examination of psychometric properties for The Turkish Sample

Year 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 79 - 92, 20.02.2016

Arzu Taşdelen-karçkay , Orkide Bakalım , Canan Yörük

Abstract

The Self-efficacy for Work–Family Conflict Management Scale (SE-WFC) was developed by Cinamon (2003) in Israel to determine the ability of individuals to manage conflict between work and family roles. Hennessy & Lent (2008) was adapted the scale into English language. The present study examined the reliability and the factor structure of SE-WFC. The sample of research was consisted of 224 women working in the public and private sectors. To examine the factor structure of the SE-WFC the model of Cinamon (2003) and the model of Hennessy & Lent (2008) were compared using the confirmatory factor analysis of two competing models. The result of the analysis indicated that the model of Hennessy & Lent (2008) was the most appropriate model for Turkish sample. Reliability of the scale was evaluated with Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency (α), and composite reliability coefficients (CRC).

Keywords

work-family conflict self-efficacy for work–family conflict competing model

References

  • Aile, T. B., & Müdürlüğü, S. A. G. (2006). TC Başbakanlık Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TUİK). Social and Cultural Activities. Aile Yapısı Araştırması, 20-5.
  • Arslan, M. (2012). İş-aile ve aile-iş çatışmalarının kadın çalışanların iş doyumları üzerindeki etkisi. Bilim ve Toplum, 2(3), 99-113.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
  • Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family. American Psychologist, 56(10), 781.
  • Bedeian, A. G., Burke, B. G., & Moffett, R. G. (1988). Outcomes of work-family conflict among married male and female professionals. Journal of management, 14(3), 475-491.
  • Burke, R. J., & Greenglass, E. R. (1999). Work-family conflict, spouse support, and nurse-staff well-being during organizational restructuring. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 327-336.
  • Byrne, B. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169-198.
  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a mul tidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational behavior, 56(2), 249-276.
  • Carlson, D.S. & Perrewe, PL. (1999). The role of social support in the stressor - strain relationship: An examination of work-family conflict. Journal of Management, 25 (4), 513-541.
  • Cinamon, G. R. (2003). Work-family conflict self-efficacy and career plans of young adults. Teac Tea Edu, 21, 365-378.
  • Cinamon, R. G. (2006). Anticipated work-family conflict: Effects of gender, self-efficacy, and family background. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(3), 202.
  • Cinamon, R. G. & Rich, Y. (2002). Profiles of attribution of importance to life roles and their impor tance for the work-family conflict. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49 (2), 212-220.
  • Duxbury, L. & Higgins, C. (2001). Work Life Balance In The New Millennium: Where are we? Where we need to go? CPNR Discussion paper (W/12) October, Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
  • Dursun, S. (2014). Kadın Çalışanların Yaşamış Oldukları İş Aile Yaşamı Çatışmasının İş Ve Yaşam Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3).
  • Erdwins, C. J., Buffardi, L. C., Casper,W J., & O’Brien, A. S. (2001). The relationship of women’s role strain to social support, role satisfaction, and self-efficacy. Family Relations, 50, 230-239.
  • Eyüboğlu, A., Özar, Ş. ve Tanrıöver, H.T. (2000). Kentlerde Yaşayan Kadınların İş Yaşamına Katılım Sorunlarının Sosyo-ekonomik ve Kültürel Boyutları. Başbakanlık K.S.S.G.M. Yayınları, Ankara: Cem Web Ofset.
  • Eby, L. T., Casper,W J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005).Work and family research in IO/OB: Content Analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124-197.
  • Frone, M, R, (2000), Work-femily conflict and employee psychiatric disorders: The national comor bidity study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 888-89.
  • Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In J. C. Quick,&L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occu pational Health Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Frone, M.R., Russell, M. & Cooper, M.L. (1997). Relation of work-family conflict to health outco mes: A four-year longitudinal study of employed parents. Journal of Occupational and Organi zational Psychology, 70, 325-335.
  • Greenhaus, J.H. & Beutell, N.J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10 (1), 76-88.
  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Bass, B. L. (2003). Work, family, and mental health: Testing different models of work-family, Int. Jounal of Marriage and Family, 65, 248-261.
  • Gutek, B.A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (4), 560-568.
  • Hennessy, K. (2005). Work-family Conflict Self-efficacy: a Scale Validation Study (Doctoral disser tation).
  • Hennessy, K. D., & Lent, R. W. (2008). Self-efficacy for managing work-family conflict: Validating the English language version of a Hebrew scale. Journal of Career Assessment. 16(3), 370-383.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1991). Aile İçinde Kadın-Erkek Rolleri. Türk Aile Ansiklopedisi. Ankara: Cilt 3, T.C. Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu. Ankara: Türkiye Yazarlar Birliği Vakfı.
  • Judge, T. A., Ilies, R., & Scott, B. A. (2006). Work-family conflict and emotions: Effects at work and at home. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 779-814.
  • Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge.
  • Kossek, E.E. & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relati onship: A review and directions for organizational behavior - human resources research. Jour nal of Applied Psychology, 83 (2), 139-149
  • Lu, L., Cooper, C. L., Kao, S. F., Chang, T. T., Allen, T. D., Lapierre, L. M. & Spector, P E. (2010). Cross-cultural differences on work-to-family conflict and role satisfaction: A Taiwanese-British comparison. Human Resource Management, 49(1), 67-85.
  • Matthews, L. S., Gonger, R. D., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (1996). Work-family conflict and marital qua lity: Mediating processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 62-79.
  • Matsui, T., Ohsawa, T., & Onglatco, M. L. (1995). Work-family conflict and the stress-buffering ef fects of husband support and coping behavior among Japanese married working women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(2), 178-192.
  • Moya, M., Exposito, F., & Ruiz, J. (2000). Close relationships, gender, and career salience. Sex Ro les, 42(9-10), 825-846.
  • Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689 725.
  • Netemeyer, R.G., Boles, J.S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work - family conflict and family - work conflict scales, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (4), 400-410.
  • Noor, N. M. (2002). Work-family conflict, locus of control, and women’s well-being: Tests of alterna tive pathways. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 645-662.
  • Parasuraman, S., & Simmers, C. A. (2001). Type of employment, work-family conflict and well-being: a comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 551-568.
  • Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and decisions at the familyQ work interfa ce. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1011-1039.
  • Rantanen, J., Pulkkinen, L., & Kinnunen, U. (2005). The big five personality dimensions, work family conflict, and psychological distress: A longitudinal view. Journal of Individual Differen ces, 26, 155-166.
  • Raykoy, T. & Marcoulides, G.A. (2006). A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling.
  • Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, USA
  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equa tion modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A Review, The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323-337
  • T.C. Başbakanlık Yayınları (2000). Kentlerde Kadınların İş Yaş amlarına Katılım Sorunlarının Sosyo-ekonomik ve Kültürel Boyutları. Ankara; Cem Web Ofset.
  • Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work family experience: Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 108-130.
There are 46 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Conference Paper
Authors

Arzu Taşdelen-karçkay

Orkide Bakalım

Canan Yörük This is me

Submission Date February 20, 2016
Publication Date February 20, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Taşdelen-karçkay, A., Bakalım, O., & Yörük, C. (2016). İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 79-92.
AMA Taşdelen-karçkay A, Bakalım O, Yörük C. İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. KUSBD. February 2016;6(1):79-92.
Chicago Taşdelen-karçkay, Arzu, Orkide Bakalım, and Canan Yörük. “İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6, no. 1 (February 2016): 79-92.
EndNote Taşdelen-karçkay A, Bakalım O, Yörük C (February 1, 2016) İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6 1 79–92.
IEEE A. Taşdelen-karçkay, O. Bakalım, and C. Yörük, “İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ”, KUSBD, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 79–92, 2016.
ISNAD Taşdelen-karçkay, Arzu et al. “İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6/1 (February2016), 79-92.
JAMA Taşdelen-karçkay A, Bakalım O, Yörük C. İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. KUSBD. 2016;6:79–92.
MLA Taşdelen-karçkay, Arzu et al. “İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016, pp. 79-92.
Vancouver Taşdelen-karçkay A, Bakalım O, Yörük C. İŞ-AİLE ÇATIŞMASINI YÖNETME ÖZ-YETERLİĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRK ÖRNEKLEMİ İÇİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. KUSBD. 2016;6(1):79-92.

Contact Information
Phone Number: +90 0318 357 35 92
Fax Number: +90 0318 357 35 97
E-mail: sbd@kku.edu.tr

Postal Address: Kırıkkale University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Şehitler Campus, 71450, Yahşihan–KIRIKKALE, Türkiye

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.