Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 87 - 91, 05.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.744376

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate of the dimensional accuracy of Polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) impression materials (Spirias, Imicryl, Konya, Turkey and Variotime, Heraeus, Hanau, Germany) by using stone models after different pouring time (1 hour and 24 hours).
Methods: A standard maxillary dentulous acrylic model was selected as master model. Two linear measurements were selected on each sample for the evaluation of the models (x: 13-23 distance, y: 13-26 distance). A total of 40 samples were divided into 4 groups according to the impression brands and pouring time (n=10). All of measurements were made with CEREC SW 4.2.3 software (Sirona Dental System, GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) using “distance” tools of the programme. Statistical analysis was performed by using the IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 25 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The relationship between different pouring times (1 hour and 24 hours) was not statistically significant (p>0.05). When the paired relations with the master model are evaluated, t test and p values show that there is statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
Conclusion: When compared with the main model, PVS materials for both brands show dimensional distortion. For PVS impression materials, the pouring of the impressions does not make any difference.

References

  • Dogan S, Schwedhelm ER, Heindl H, et al. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(2):217–22. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.019
  • Garg S, Kumar S, Jain S, et al. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of stone models fabricated by three different impression techniques using two brands of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(8):928–34. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2629
  • Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, et al. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(6):349–56. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7
  • Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, et al. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(2):107–13. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60026-8.
  • Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(4):274–81. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60061-X
  • Raigrodski AJ, Dogan S, Mancl LA, et al. A Clinical Comparison of Two Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Materials Using the One-Step Technique. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102(3):179–86. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60143-8.
  • Levartovsky S, Zalis M, Pilo R, et al. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(2):124–33. doi:10.1111/jopr.12062
  • Chee WWL, Donovan TE. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: A review of properties and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(5):728–32. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(92)90192-d
  • Clancy JMS, Scandrett FR, Ettinger RL. Long‐term dimensional stability of three current elastomers. J Oral Rehabil. 1983;10(4):325–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00127.x
  • Lacy AM, Fukui H, Bellman T, et al. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part II: Polyether, polysulfides, and polyvinylsiloxane. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45(3):329–33. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(81)90400-5
  • Hung SH, Purk JH, Tira DE, et al. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(5):583–9. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(92)90151-y
  • Leão MP, Pinto CP, Sponchiado AP, et al. Dimensional stability of a novel polyvinyl siloxane impression technique. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2014;13(2):118–23. doi:10.1590/1677-3225v13n2a08
  • Donovan TE, Chee WWL. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(2):445–70. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.014
  • Ozsoy HE, Najafova, L, Kurtulmus H. Quality of impressions using two different brands of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Sanamed. 2020;15(2):111–114. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24125/sanamed.v15i2.409
  • Shillingburg, H.T., Hobo, S., Whitsett, L.D., et al. (1997) Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3rd Edition, Quintessence, Chicago, 185.
  • Pereira JR, Murata KY, do Valle AL, et al. Linear dimensional changes in plaster die models using different elastomeric materials. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(3):336–41. doi:10.1590/s1806-83242010000300013
  • Franco EB, Da Cunha LF, Benetti AR. Effect of storage period on the accuracy of elastomeric impressions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15(3):195–8. doi:10.1590/s1678-77572007000300008
  • Franco EB, da Cunha LF, Herrera FS, et al. Accuracy of Single-Step versus 2-Step Double-Mix Impression Technique. ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:1–5. doi:10.5402/2011/341546

Model Elde Etme Süresinin Polivinil Siloksan Ölçü Malzemelerinin Boyutsal Doğruluğu Üzerine Etkisi

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 87 - 91, 05.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.744376

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Polivinilsiloksan (PVS) ölçü malzemelerinin (Spirias, Imicryl, Konya, Türkiye ve Variotime, Heraeus, Hanau, Almanya) farklı döküm sürelerinden sonra (1 saat ve 24 saat) alçı modeller kullanılarak boyutsal doğruluğunun değerlendirilmesidir.
Yöntem: Ana model olarak standart maksiller akrilik model seçildi. Modellerin değerlendirilmesi için her numune üzerinde x ve y mesafesi adıyla iki lineer ölçüm noktası belirlendi (x: 13-23 nolu dişler arası mesafe, y: 13-26 nolu dişler arası mesafe). Ölçü markalarına ve dökme süresine göre toplam 40 örnek 4 gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Tüm ölçümler “mesafe” araçları kullanılarak CEREC SW 4.2.3 (Sirona Dental System, GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) yazılımı ile yapıldı. İstatistiksel analiz, IBM SPSS Statistics, Sürüm 25 (Windows için IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. p<0,05 değeri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Farklı dökme süreleri (1 saat ve 24 saat) arasındaki ilişki istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunamamıştır (p>0,05). Ana model ile eşleştirilmiş markaların ilişkileri değerlendiriliğinde, t testi ve p değerleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olduğu gösterilmiştir (p<0,05).
Sonuç: Ana modelle karşılaştırıldığında, her iki marka için PVS malzemeleri boyutsal değişim göstermektedir. Ancak bu değişim PVS ölçü malzemeleri için, alçı modellerin dökülme süreleri arasında herhangi bir fark yaratmamaktadır.

References

  • Dogan S, Schwedhelm ER, Heindl H, et al. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(2):217–22. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.019
  • Garg S, Kumar S, Jain S, et al. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of stone models fabricated by three different impression techniques using two brands of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(8):928–34. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2629
  • Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, et al. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(6):349–56. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7
  • Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, et al. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(2):107–13. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60026-8.
  • Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(4):274–81. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60061-X
  • Raigrodski AJ, Dogan S, Mancl LA, et al. A Clinical Comparison of Two Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Materials Using the One-Step Technique. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102(3):179–86. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60143-8.
  • Levartovsky S, Zalis M, Pilo R, et al. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(2):124–33. doi:10.1111/jopr.12062
  • Chee WWL, Donovan TE. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: A review of properties and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(5):728–32. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(92)90192-d
  • Clancy JMS, Scandrett FR, Ettinger RL. Long‐term dimensional stability of three current elastomers. J Oral Rehabil. 1983;10(4):325–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00127.x
  • Lacy AM, Fukui H, Bellman T, et al. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part II: Polyether, polysulfides, and polyvinylsiloxane. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45(3):329–33. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(81)90400-5
  • Hung SH, Purk JH, Tira DE, et al. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(5):583–9. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(92)90151-y
  • Leão MP, Pinto CP, Sponchiado AP, et al. Dimensional stability of a novel polyvinyl siloxane impression technique. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2014;13(2):118–23. doi:10.1590/1677-3225v13n2a08
  • Donovan TE, Chee WWL. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(2):445–70. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.014
  • Ozsoy HE, Najafova, L, Kurtulmus H. Quality of impressions using two different brands of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Sanamed. 2020;15(2):111–114. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24125/sanamed.v15i2.409
  • Shillingburg, H.T., Hobo, S., Whitsett, L.D., et al. (1997) Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3rd Edition, Quintessence, Chicago, 185.
  • Pereira JR, Murata KY, do Valle AL, et al. Linear dimensional changes in plaster die models using different elastomeric materials. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(3):336–41. doi:10.1590/s1806-83242010000300013
  • Franco EB, Da Cunha LF, Benetti AR. Effect of storage period on the accuracy of elastomeric impressions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15(3):195–8. doi:10.1590/s1678-77572007000300008
  • Franco EB, da Cunha LF, Herrera FS, et al. Accuracy of Single-Step versus 2-Step Double-Mix Impression Technique. ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:1–5. doi:10.5402/2011/341546
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Original Article | Dentistry
Authors

Hilal Ekşi Özsoy 0000-0003-2061-9081

Lamia Najafova 0000-0003-2164-7818

Hayal Boyacıoğlu 0000-0003-0887-0302

Huseyin Krtulmus 0000-0001-5013-3766

Publication Date January 5, 2021
Submission Date May 28, 2020
Acceptance Date December 23, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Ekşi Özsoy, H., Najafova, L., Boyacıoğlu, H., Krtulmus, H. (2021). The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.744376
AMA Ekşi Özsoy H, Najafova L, Boyacıoğlu H, Krtulmus H. The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials. KOU Sag Bil Derg. January 2021;7(1):87-91. doi:10.30934/kusbed.744376
Chicago Ekşi Özsoy, Hilal, Lamia Najafova, Hayal Boyacıoğlu, and Huseyin Krtulmus. “The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials”. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 7, no. 1 (January 2021): 87-91. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.744376.
EndNote Ekşi Özsoy H, Najafova L, Boyacıoğlu H, Krtulmus H (January 1, 2021) The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 7 1 87–91.
IEEE H. Ekşi Özsoy, L. Najafova, H. Boyacıoğlu, and H. Krtulmus, “The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials”, KOU Sag Bil Derg, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 87–91, 2021, doi: 10.30934/kusbed.744376.
ISNAD Ekşi Özsoy, Hilal et al. “The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials”. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 7/1 (January 2021), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.744376.
JAMA Ekşi Özsoy H, Najafova L, Boyacıoğlu H, Krtulmus H. The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials. KOU Sag Bil Derg. 2021;7:87–91.
MLA Ekşi Özsoy, Hilal et al. “The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials”. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021, pp. 87-91, doi:10.30934/kusbed.744376.
Vancouver Ekşi Özsoy H, Najafova L, Boyacıoğlu H, Krtulmus H. The Effect of Pouring Time on Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials. KOU Sag Bil Derg. 2021;7(1):87-91.