Research Article

EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS

Volume: 24 Number: 2 August 31, 2022
EN TR

EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to determine and compare the demographic and histopathological features of eyelid and periocular tumors.
Material and Methods: The medical records of the patients who had eyelid and periocular tumor surgery were retrospectively analyzed at the ophthalmology clinic. The data included age, gender, tumor location and histopathological outcomes and comparative study was performed between the benign, malignant and premalignant tumors. Detailed site of the tumor was described as right and left or bilateral, upper and lower. Medial and lateral canthal tumors and eyebrow tumors were described as periocular tumors. SPSS computer statistical software (version Chicago) was used for statistical analysis. Chi-square test was used for the significant differences.
Results: A total of 190 patients with histopathologic confirmation were evaluated; 160 were (84.2%) eyelid lesions and 30 (15.8%) were periocular lesions. One hundred and forty (87.5%) of the eyelid lesions were benign, 17 (10.6%) of eyelid lesions were malignant and 3 (1.8%) of lesions were premalignant. Twenty (66.7%) of the periocular lesions were benign, 9 (30%) malignant and 1 (3.3%) was premalignant. Benign tumors were found to occur at younger ages compared to malignant (p=0.03) and premalignant lesions (p=0.038). One hundred and ten (68.7%) of benign tumors were seen in women and 50 (31.3%) in men. In contrast to benign tumors, malignant and premalignant tumors were more common in males (p=0.003). Malignant tumors were found to be significantly higher in the right eyes. There was a statistically significant difference in malignancy between periocular and eyelid tumors (χ(2)=8.488, p=0.014). Malignant tumors were found to be significantly higher in periocular lesions. Epidermal cyst (17.5%) was the most common benign tumor. Basal cell carcinoma was the most frequent malignant type (73.1%).
Conclusion: Gender of male, lower lid location and senility are the risk factors that should be concerned in eyelid and periocular tumors.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Deprez M, Uffer S. Clinicopathological features of eyelid skin tumors. A retrospective study of 5504 cases and review of literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2009;31(3):256-62.
  2. 2. Welch RB, Duke JR. Lesions of the lids; a statistical note. Am J Ophthalmol. 1958;45(3):415-26.
  3. 3. Aurora AL, Blodi FC. Lesions of the eyelids: clinicopathological study. Surv Ophthalmol. 1970;15:94-104.
  4. 4. Tesluk GC. Eyelid lesions: incidence and comparison of benign and malignant lesions. Ann Ophthalmol. 1985;17(11):704-7.
  5. 5. Margo CE. Eyelid tumors: accuracy of clinical diagnosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128(5):635-6.
  6. 6. Sendul SY, Akpolat C, Yilmaz Z, Eryilmaz OT, Guven D, Kabukcuoglu F. Clinical and pathological diagnosis and comparison of benign and malignant eyelid tumors. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021;44(4):537-43.
  7. 7. Yumuşak ME, Onaran Z, Örnek K, Oğurel T, Balcı M. Göz kapağı ve perioküler bölge tümörlerinin histopatolojik dağılımı. Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi. 2016;8(3):135-39.
  8. 8. Xu XL, Li B, Sun XL, Li LQ, Ren RJ, Gao F et al. Eyelid neoplasms in the Beijing Tongren Eye Centre between 1997 and 2006. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39(5):367-72.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 31, 2022

Submission Date

March 31, 2022

Acceptance Date

June 20, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 24 Number: 2

APA
Özdoğan, S. (2022). EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, 24(2), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.1096679
AMA
1.Özdoğan S. EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS. Kırıkkale Uni Med J. 2022;24(2):357-364. doi:10.24938/kutfd.1096679
Chicago
Özdoğan, Sibel. 2022. “EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 24 (2): 357-64. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.1096679.
EndNote
Özdoğan S (August 1, 2022) EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 24 2 357–364.
IEEE
[1]S. Özdoğan, “EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS”, Kırıkkale Uni Med J, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 357–364, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.24938/kutfd.1096679.
ISNAD
Özdoğan, Sibel. “EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 24/2 (August 1, 2022): 357-364. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.1096679.
JAMA
1.Özdoğan S. EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS. Kırıkkale Uni Med J. 2022;24:357–364.
MLA
Özdoğan, Sibel. “EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, vol. 24, no. 2, Aug. 2022, pp. 357-64, doi:10.24938/kutfd.1096679.
Vancouver
1.Sibel Özdoğan. EVALUATION OF THE EYELID AND PERIOCULAR TUMORS. Kırıkkale Uni Med J. 2022 Aug. 1;24(2):357-64. doi:10.24938/kutfd.1096679

Cited By

This Journal is a Publication of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine.