Pages 40-42

Abstract

Face presentation is a rare kind of malpresentation that has an incidence between 1/600-1/800. The diagnose is made by vaginal examination and ultrasonography (US). Etiologically anencephaly, multiparity, contacted pelvis, small or large fetus, plasenta previa, polyhdramnios, uterin anomalies and nuchal cord are responsible factors. Mentum anterior face presentations can be delivered vaginally, however cesarean sectio is the preferred route for fetus presenting with mentum posterior. We aimed to present a case and review the litreture of a mentum posterior face presentation complicated with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) for 72 hours which has arrested in labour in a multiparous placenta previa pregnant.

Keywords

• Malpresentations, face presentation, placenta previa, cesarean sectio

Plasenta Previa ve Uzamış Membran Rüptürü Olan Olguda İhmal Edilmiş Mentum Posterior Yüz Geliş

Abstract

Yüz geliş, sık görülmeyen bir prezentasyon biçimi olup insidansı 1/600-1/800 arasındadır. Tanısı vajinal muayene ve ultrasonografi (USG) ile konur. Etyolojide anensefali, multiparite, kontrakte pelvis, büyük ve küçük fetüs, plasenta previa, polihidroamniyoz, uterin anomali ve nukkal kalınlık suçlanmaktadır. Doğum mentum posterior yüz gelişlerde sezaryen ile tercih edilirken, mentum anteriorda vajinal doğum denenebilir. Bu olguda plasenta previalı multipar gebede yaklaşık 72 saatlik membran rüptürü öyküsüyle doğum kanalında sıkışmış mentum posterior yüz geliş fetüse yaklaşımı ve sonuçlarını son literatür verilerine dayanarak sunmayı amaçladık.

Keywords

• Malprezentasyonlar, yüz geliş, plasenta previa, sezaryen

References

1. Gardberg M, Leonova Y, Laakkonen E. Malpresentations--impact on mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 ;90(5):540-2 Duff P. Diagnosis and management of face presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57(1):105. Ducarme G, Ceccaldi PF, Chesnoy V, Robinet G, Gabriel R . Face presentation: retrospective study of 32 cases at term. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006;34(5):393.
2. Bhal PS, Davies NJ, Chung T. A population study of face and brow presentation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;18(3):231.
3. Cruikshank DP, Cruikshank JE. Face and brow presentation: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981;24(2):333.
4. Zayed F, Amarin Z, Obeidat B, Obeidat N, Alchalabi H, Lataifeh I. Face and brow presentation in northern Jordan, over a decade of e xperience.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 ;278(5):427
5. Ingólfsson A. Brow presentations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1969; 48(4):486.
6. Cruikshank DP, Cruikshank RN. Face and brow presentation. A review. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981 24: 333–351
7. Reddoch W. Face presentation; a study of 160 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1948; 56: 86–89 Bhal PS, Davies NJ, Chung T. A population study of face and brow presentation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 18(3):231–235
8. Rudolph SJ. Face presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1947; 54: 987–993

9. Reinke T. Face presentation; a review of 94 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1953; 66:1185–1190