Bana Skolyozu Anlatır mısın? Adölesan İdiopatik Skolyoz Konulu Türkçe İnternet Sayfaları ve Youtube Videolarının Kalite, Güvenilirlik ve Konservatif Tedavi İçeriklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı adölesan idiopatik skolyoz bilgilendirmesi için hazırlanmış Türkçe internet sayfaları ve YouTube videolarının kalite ve güvenilirliğini karşılaştırmaktı. İnternet sayfaları ile Youtube videolarının konservatif tedavi (korse ve egzersiz) içeriklerinin karşılaştırılması çalışmanın bir diğer amacıydı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Adölesan idiyopatik skolyoz ile ilgili toplam 46 Türkçe dijital içerik (23 web sayfası ve 23 YouTube videosu) çalışmaya alındı. Dijital içeriklerin kalitesi genel kalite skoru ve güvenilirlikleri Amerikan Tabipler Birliği Dergisi karşılaştırma kriterlerine göre ölçüldü. Bulgular: Adölesan idiopatik skolyoz ile ilişkili Türkçe internet sayfaları ile Youtube videolarının genel kalite skorları (p=0,540) ve Amerikan Tabipler Birliği karşılaştırma skorları (p=0,591) benzerdi. Bununla birlikte adölesan idiopatik skolyoz ile ilgili Türkçe internet sayfalarının ve videolarnın güvenilirlikleri ve eğitsel kaliteleri yetersizdi. Sonuç: Adölesan idiopatik skolyoz konulu Türkçe internet sayfa ve YouTube videoları değerli bilgiler içermesine rağmen kalite ve güvenilirliklerinin arttırılması gerekmektedir. Video ve internet sayfaları eğitsel kalite açısından birbirine göre avantajlı değildir. Ayrıca video ve internet sayfalarının adölesan idiopatik skolyozun konservatif tedavisi ile ilgili bilgilere daha çok yer vermesi gerekmektedir.

Keywords

• Adölesan
• internet
• skolyoz
• omurga

CAN YOU TELL ME ABOUT SCOLIOSIS? COMPARISON OF QUALITY, RELIABILITY, AND CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT CONTENTS OF TURKISH WEBSITES AND YOUTUBE VIDEOS ON ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the quality and reliability of Turkish web pages and YouTube videos prepared for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis information. Another aim of the study was to compare whether internet pages and YouTube videos contain some features related to conservative treatment (brace and exercise). Material and Methods: A total of 46 Turkish digital contents related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (23 web pages and 23 YouTube videos) were included in the study. The quality of digital content was measured according to the general quality score and reliability of the Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria. Results: The general quality scores (p=0.540) and Journal of American Medical Association benchmark scores (p=0.591) of the Turkish websites and the YouTube videos related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were similar. However, the reliability and educational quality of Turkish websites and videos on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were insufficient. Conclusion: Although the Turkish website and YouTube videos on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis contain valuable information, their quality and reliability need to be increased. Video and web pages are not advantageous compared to each other in terms of educational quality. Additionally, videos and websites should include more information about the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Keywords

• Adolescent
• internet
• scoliosis
• spine

References

1. Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018;13(1):1-48.
2. Labelle H, Richards SB, De Kleuver M, et al. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force. Scoliosis. 2013;8(1):1-6.
3. Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(1):3-9.
4. Yılmaz H, Zateri C, Ozkan AK, Kayalar G, Berk H. Prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Turkey: An epidemiological study. Spine J. 2020;20(6):947-955.
5. Dolan LA, Donzelli S, Zaina F, Weinstein SL, Negrini S. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis bracing success is influenced by time in brace: Comparative effectiveness analysis of BrAIST and ISICO cohorts. Spine. 2020;45(17):1193-1199.
6. Gámiz-Bermúdez F, Obrero-Gaitán E, Zagalaz-Anula N, Lomas-Vega R. Corrective exercise-based therapy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(5):597-608.
7. Schreiber S, Parent EC, Hill DL, Hedden DM, Moreau MJ, Southon SC. Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis perceive positive improvements regardless of change in the Cobb angle–Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month Schroth intervention added to standard care and standard care alone. SOSORT 2018 Award winner. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):319.
8. Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):1- 35.

9. Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Rigo M, Zaina F, international Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT). Guidelines on “standards of management of idiopathic scoliosis with corrective braces in everyday clinics and in clinical research”: SOSORT consensus 2008. Scoliosis. 2009;4:2.
10. de Vries U, Hampel P, Petermann F. Patient education programs in child and adolescent rehabilitation. Die Rehabilitation. 2017;56(2):103-108.
11. Kanchan S, Gaidhane A. Social media role and its impact on public health: A narrative review. Cureus. 2023;15(1): e33737.
12. Lysenko M, Law P, Jarvis J, Wright JG. Improving education and coping of scoliosis patients undergoing surgery, and their families, using e-health. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(6):673-683.
13. Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, et al. Surfing for scoliosis: The quality of information available on the Internet. Spine. 2005;30(23):2695-2700.
14. Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J, Devitt A. Online curves: A quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube. Spine. 2015;40(23):1857-1861.
15. Rudisill SS, Saleh NZ, Hornung AL, et al. YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: A reliability and educational quality analysis. Spine Deform. 2023;11(1):3-9.
16. Shungu N, Haley SP, Berini CR, Foster D, Diaz VA. Quality of YouTube videos on prostate cancer screening for black men. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(4):724- 731.
17. Cinar C. A Comparison of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos uploaded by healthcare professionals about scoliosis in the past decade. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e44830.
18. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis—a wakeup call?. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903.
19. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244- 1245.
20. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018;43(22):E1334-1339.
21. El Hawary R, Zaaroor-Regev D, Floman Y, Lonner BS, Alkhalife YI, Betz RR. Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Risk factors for failure - A literature review. Spine J. 2019;19(12):1917-1925.
22. Ridderbusch K, Spiro AS, Kunkel P, Grolle B, Stücker R, Rupprecht M. Strategies for treating scoliosis in early childhood. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(22):371-376.
23. Negrini, S. Approach to scoliosis changed due to causes other than evidence: patients call for conservative (rehabilitation) experts to join in team orthopedic surgeons. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):731-741.