Adölesanların Okulda Yaşadığı Şiddet Deneyimleri: Nitel Bir Araştırma

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma adölesanların okulda yaşadığı şiddet deneyimlerinin derinlemesine incelenmesi amacıyla nitel yöntemle yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 10-18 yaş aralığındaki 20 adölesan katılmıştır. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile toplanmıştır. Görüşmeler online ve yüzyüze olarak yapılmış ve ses kaydı alınmıştır. MAXQDA 2022 paket programı aracılığı ile tümevarımcı içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın yapılabilmesi için etik kurul izni, adölesan ve ebeveyn onamları alınmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan adölesanların yaş ortalaması 14,2±2,76’dır. Adölesanların 10’u ortaokul, 10’u lise düzeyinde eğitim almaktadır. Araştırma bulguları doğrultusunda dört tema "şiddet deneyimi", "şiddetin etkileri", " baş etme yöntemleri" ve "şiddeti önleme önerileri" belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Adölesanların hepsinin okulda şiddet yaşadığı ya da şiddete tanık olduğu belirlenmiştir. Şiddetin okulda önemli bir sorun olduğu görülmektedir. Okullarda şiddetin önlenmesine yönelik eğitimlerin planlanması, çocuk ve ailelerin bilgilendirilmesi, okullarda güvenlik önlemlerinin artırılması, öğretmen ve idarecilerin şiddeti önlemede etkin rol alması önerilmektedir.

Keywords

• Adölesan
• okul
• şiddet
• nitel araştırma

THE VIOLENCE EXPERIENCES OF ADOLESCENTS AT SCHOOL: A QUALİTATİVE RESEARCH

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted with a qualitative method to examine in depth the violence experiences of adolescents at school. Material and Methods: Twenty adolescents between the ages of 10 and 18 participated in the study. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview form. The interviews were conducted online and face-to-face and were audio recorded. Inductive content analysis was conducted through the MAXQDA 2022 package program. Ethics committee permission and adolescent and parental consent were obtained to conduct the study. Results: The average age of the adolescents participating in the study is 14.2±2.76. Ten of the adolescents are educated at secondary school level and 10 of them are educated at high school level. In line with the research findings, four themes "experience of violence”, "effects of violence", "coping methods" and "suggestions for preventing violence" were determined. Conclusion: It was determined that all adolescents experienced or witnessed violence at school. Violence appears to be a significant problem at school. It is recommended to plan training to prevent violence in schools, to inform children and families, to increase security measures in schools, and for teachers and administrators to take an active role in preventing violence.

Keywords

• Adolescence
• school
• violence
• qualitative research

References

1. Miller TW. School-related violence: Definition, scope, and prevention goals. In: Miller TW, eds. School Violence and Primary Prevention. Cham. Springer, 2023: 3-18.
2. Ncontsa VN, Shumba A. The nature, causes and effects of school violence in South African high schools. S Afr J Educ. 2013;33(3):1-15.
3. Chen J-K, Avi Astor R. School violence in Taiwan: Examining how western risk factors predict school violence in an Asian culture. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(8):1388-1410.
4. Berkowitz R. Student and teacher responses to violence in school: The divergent views of bullies, victims, and bully- victims. Sch Psychol Int. 2014;35(5):485-503.
5. BenYishay A, Sayers R, Wells J. Prevalence of school related violence in seven countries: A cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2024;19(5):e0301833.
6. CDC. About School Violence 2024. Accessed date: 10 January 2025: https://www.cdc.gov/youth-violence/about/ about-school-violence.html.
7. Mkhize S, Sibisi NN. Exposure to community violence and its impact on schools in Swayimana KwaZulu-Natal. Eur J Econ. 2021;5(3):721-733.
8. Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Lösel F. School bullying as a predictor of violence later in life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012;17(5):405-418.

9. Loder RT, Farooq H, Gianaris JB. Assaults in schools: Findings using a national data base. J Forensic Leg Med. 2022;86:102306.
10. CDC. Key Findings: School-associated violent death study 2024. Accessed date: 10 January 2025: https:// www.cdc.gov.
11. Irwin V, Wang K, Cui J, Zhang J, Thompson A. Report on indicators of school crime and safety: 2023. National Center for Education Statistics, 2024.
12. Yosep I, Hikmat R, Mardhiyah A. School-based nursing interventions for preventing bullying and reducing its incidence on students: A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1577.
13. Kub J, Feldman MA. Bullying prevention: A call for collaborative efforts between school nurses and school psychologists. Psychol Sch.2015;52(7):658-671.
14. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. 10th ed. Ankara. Seçkin Publishing, 2016.
15. Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. 5th ed. China. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.
16. Kyngäs H, Kääriäinen M, Elo S. The trustworthiness of content analysis. In: Kyngäs H, Mikkonen K, Kääriäinen M, eds. The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research. Cham. Springer, 2020:41-48.
17. Irwin V, Wang K, Cui J, Thompson A. Report on Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2022. NCES 2023- 092. National Center for Education Statistics, 2023.
18. Waldron LM. “Girls are worse” drama queens, ghetto Girls, tomboys, and the meaning of girl fights. Youth & Society. 2011;43(4):1298-1334.
19. Irwin K, Adler C. Fighting for her honor: Girls’ violence in distressed communities. Fem Criminol. 2012;7(4):350- 380.
20. Güngör H, Değirmendere M, Gürbüz S. Administrative perspective on violence in school environment in official high schools (sample of Bursa province). Int J Educ Res Rev. 2022;7(2):71-87.
21. Okagbue EF, Wang M, Ezeachikulo UP. Does school bullying show lack of effective multicultural education in the school curriculum? IJEDRO. 2022;3:100178.
22. Bandura A. Social learning analysis of aggression. In: Ribes-Inesta E, Bandura A, eds. Analysis of Delinquency and Aggression. 1st ed. England, Oxford, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976:203-232.
23. Valdebenito S, Ttofi M, Eisner M. Prevalence rates of drug use among school bullies and victims: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Aggress Violent Behav. 2015;23:137-146.
24. Cheng S, Kaminga AC, Liu Q, et al. Association between weight status and bullying experiences among children and adolescents in schools: An updated meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2022;134:105833.
25. Anciones-Anguita K. Adolescents' interaction in whatsapp groups: the normalization of violent content. Available at SSRN. 2025, https://ssrn.com/abstract=5141870.
26. Midgett A, Doumas DM, Johnston A, Trull R, Miller R. Rethinking bullying interventions for high school students: A qualitative study. J. Child Adolesc Couns.2018;4(2):146-163.
27. Ssenyonga J, Katharin H, Mattonet K, Nkuba M, Hecker T. Reducing teachers’ use of violence toward students: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in secondary schools in Southwestern Uganda. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022;138:106521.
28. Kızıltepe R, Irmak TY, Eslek D, Hecker T. Prevalence of violence by teachers and its association to students’ emotional and behavioral problems and school performance: Findings from secondary school students and teachers in Turkey. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2020;107:104559.
29. Longobardi C, Badenes-Ribera L, Fabris MA, Martinez A, McMahon SD. Prevalence of student violence against teachers: A meta-analysis. Psychol Viol.2019;9(6):596.
30. Turanovic JJ, Siennick SE. The Causes and Consequences of School Violence: A Review. National Institute of Justice, 2022.
31. Erdem Y, Şengül ZK, Erdem EE. Üniversite öğrencilerinin şiddet yaşama durumları, şiddet tutumları ve benlik saygısı ilişkisi. SSS J. 2024;8(105):4322-4330.
32. Mehdinezhad V, Rashki J. Causes of violence by high school students: A teachers and principals perspective. AJESI. 2018;8(2):174-198.