KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİ HASTANESİ’NDE GÖZÜN ALINMASI ENDİKASYONLARI: SEKİZ YILLIK SONUÇLARIMIZ

Year 2016, , 6 - 11, 30.04.2016

Erhan Yumuşak , Zafer Onaran Tevfik Oğurel Nesrin Büyüktortop Yaşar Ölmez

https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.252663

Abstract

Giriş: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp
Fakültesi Hastanesi’nde gözün alınma sebepleri ve tercih edilen cerrahi prosedürlerin
değerlendirilmesi.

Gereç ve Yöntem: 2008-2016 yılları arasında gözü
alınan 34 hastaya ait yaş, cins, lateralizasyon,
ameliyat öncesi tanı ve operasyon bilgileri retrospektif olarak
değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: Hastaların
ortalama yaşı 66.8±21.90 (2-99 yıl) olarak bulundu.
21 erkek (% 61.76), 13 kadın (% 39.24) hasta vardı. Hastaların 17’sine
evisserasyon, 14'üne enükleasyon, 3'üne ise ekzenterasyon ameliyatı
yapılmıştır. Gözün alınması endikasyonları olarak sırasıyla en çok enfeksiyöz
nedenler (n=9, %26.5) yer alırken, tümörler (n=6, % 17.6), travma (n=4,%11.8),
absolü glokom (n=4, %11.8) ve büllöz keratopati (n=3, %8.8) bunu takip
etmiştir.

Sonuç: Enfeksiyöz nedenler serimizde gözün alınma endikasyonlarında ilk sırayı
alırken, travma ikinci sıradadır. Evisserasyon ise en sık kullanılan yöntem
olarak bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Evisserasyon, enükleasyon, ekzenterasyon

Indications for Eye Removal Surgeries in Kırıkkale University Medical Faculty Hospital: Eight Year Experience

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the indications
and preferred surgical procedures for eye removal at Kırıkkale University
Medical Faculty Hospital.

Materials and Methods: The medical records (age,
gender, affected eye, type of surgical procedure, indications of surgery) of 34
patients whose eyes were removed between 2008-2016 years were reviewed
retrospectively.

Results: The mean age was 66.8±21.90
(2-99 years). The number of male in the patient group was 21 (61.76%) and
female was 13 (39.24%). Evisceration was performed in 17 patients
(50.0%), enucleation was performed in 14 patients
(41.17%) and 3 of them (8.82%) were underwent exenteration. The leading indications for eye amputations were enfectious
reasons (n=9, 26.5%), malignancy (n=8, 17.6%), trauma (n=4, 11.8%), absolute
glaucoma (n=4, 11.8%) and bullous keratopathy (n=3, 8.8%).

Conclusion: Infectious reasons were the most common
etiology for eye removals, and malignancy was the second. Evisceration was found to be the most
commonly performed surgery for the eye removal. 

Keywords

Evisceration, enucleation, exenteration

References

• Coden DJ. Orbital exenteration. In: Stephenson CM (ed) Ophthalmic Plastic, Reconstructive, and Orbital Surgery, 1st ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston1997: 487-96.
• Perman KI, Baylis HI. Evisceration, enucleation, and exenteration. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1988; 21: 171-82.
• Walter WL. Update on enucleation and evisceration surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 1: 243-52.
• Kaimbo K Causes of enucleation in Zaire. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988; 11(10): 677-80.
• Shapiro A, Monselise MB. Destructive ophthalmic procedures, a comparison between a developed and a developing country. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1978; 207(4): 271-2.
• Andre OE, Viola AD, Godefroy K, Abduraman O, Assumpta LB, Come EM. Indications for destructive eye surgeries at Yaoundegynae-obstetric and paediatric hospital. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5: 561-5.
• Su GW, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 20: 274-80.
• Hansen AB, Petersen C, Heegaard S, et al. Review of 1028 bulbar eviscerations and enucleations. Changes in aetiology and frequency over a 20-year period. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999; 77: 331-5.
• Viswanathan P, Sagoo MS, Olver JM. National survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91: 616-9.
• Genevois O, Millet P, Retout A, et al. Comparison after 10 years of two 100-patient cohorts operated on for eviscerations or enucleations. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004; 14: 363-8.
• Kilmartin DJ, Dick AD, Forrester JV. Prospective surveillance of sympathetic ophthalmia in the UK and Republic of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84: 259-63.
• Yousuf SJ, Jones LS, Kidwell ED Jr. Enucleation and Evisceration: 20 Years of Experience. Orbit. 2012; 31(4): 211-5.
• Bekibele CO, Oluwasola AO. A clinicopathological study of orbito-ocular diseases in Ibadan between 1991–1999. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2003; 32(2): 197- 202.
• Haile M, Alemayehu W. Causes of removal of theeye in Ethiopia. East Afr Med J. 1995; 72 (11): 735-8.
• United State Eye Injury Register on line. Eye trauma epidemiology and prevention. Access date: 11 March 2015:
• http://www.useironline.org/ Prevention.htm.
• Dada T, Ray M, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. A study of the indications and changing trends of evisceration in North India. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 30(2): 120-3.
• Ibanga A, Asana U, Nkanga D, Duke R, Etim B, Oworu O. Indications for eye removal in southern Nigeria. Int Ophthalmol. 2013; 33(4): 355-60. doi: 10.1007/s10792-012-9700-8. (Epub 2012 Dec 29). 18. Gyasi ME, Amoaku WMK, Adjuik MA. Epidemiology of hospitalized ocular injuries in the Upper East region of Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2007;41(4):171-5.
• Leonard MP, Andrew L, Beatrice B, et al. Characteristics and causes of penetrating eye injuries reported to the national eye trauma system registry, 1985-91. Public Health Rep. 1993; 108(5): 625-32.
• Andrew LD, Leonard MP, Ross JB, et al. Penetrating eye injuries in the work place. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110(6): 843-8.
• Ababneh OH, AboTaleb EA, Abu Ameerh MA, Yousef YA. Enucleation and evisceration at a tertiary care hospital in a developing country. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015; 15: 120. doi: 10.1186/s12886- 015-0108-x.
• Köylü MT, Gökçe G, Uysal Y, Ceylan OM, Akıncıoğlu D, Günal A. Indications for eye removal surgeries. A 15 year experience at a tertiary military hospital. Saudi Med J. 2015; 36 (10): 1205-9. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.10.12031.