KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİ HASTANESİ’NDE GÖZÜN ALINMASI ENDİKASYONLARI: SEKİZ YILLIK SONUÇLARIMIZ

Abstract

Giriş: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi’nde gözün alınma sebepleri ve tercih edilen cerrahi prosedürlerin değerlendirilmesi.

Gereç ve Yöntem: 2008-2016 yılları arasında gözü alınan 34 hastaya ait yaş, cins, lateralizasyon, ameliyat öncesi tanı ve operasyon bilgileri retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 66.8±21.90 (2-99 yıl) olarak bulundu. 21 erkek (% 61.76), 13 kadın (% 39.24) hasta vardı. Hastaların 17’sine evisserasyon, 14'üne enükleasyon, 3'üne ise ekzenterasyon ameliyatı yapılmıştır. Gözün alınması endikasyonları olarak sırasıyla en çok enfeksiyöz nedenler (n=9, %26.5) yer alırken, tümörler (n=6, % 17.6), travma (n=4,%11.8), absolü glokom (n=4, %11.8) ve büllöz keratopati (n=3, %8.8) bunu takip etmiştir.

Sonuç: Enfeksiyöz nedenler serimizde gözün alınma endikasyonlarında ilk sırayı alırken, travma ikinci sıradadır. Evisserasyon ise en sık kullanılan yöntem olarak bulunmuştur.

Keywords

• Evisserasyon,enükleasyon,ekzenterasyon

Indications for Eye Removal Surgeries in Kırıkkale University Medical Faculty Hospital: Eight Year Experience

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the indications and preferred surgical procedures for eye removal at Kırıkkale University Medical Faculty Hospital.

Materials and Methods: The medical records (age, gender, affected eye, type of surgical procedure, indications of surgery) of 34 patients whose eyes were removed between 2008-2016 years were reviewed retrospectively.

Results: The mean age was 66.8±21.90 (2-99 years). The number of male in the patient group was 21 (61.76%) and female was 13 (39.24%). Evisceration was performed in 17 patients (50.0%), enucleation was performed in 14 patients (41.17%) and 3 of them (8.82%) were underwent exenteration. The leading indications for eye amputations were enfectious reasons (n=9, 26.5%), malignancy (n=8, 17.6%), trauma (n=4, 11.8%), absolute glaucoma (n=4, 11.8%) and bullous keratopathy (n=3, 8.8%).

Conclusion: Infectious reasons were the most common etiology for eye removals, and malignancy was the second. Evisceration was found to be the most commonly performed surgery for the eye removal. 

Keywords

• Evisceration,enucleation,exenteration

References

1. Coden DJ. Orbital exenteration. In: Stephenson CM (ed) Ophthalmic Plastic, Reconstructive, and Orbital Surgery, 1st ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston1997: 487-96.
2. Perman KI, Baylis HI. Evisceration, enucleation, and exenteration. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1988; 21: 171-82.
3. Walter WL. Update on enucleation and evisceration surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 1: 243-52.
4. Kaimbo K Causes of enucleation in Zaire. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988; 11(10): 677-80.
5. Shapiro A, Monselise MB. Destructive ophthalmic procedures, a comparison between a developed and a developing country. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1978; 207(4): 271-2.
6. Andre OE, Viola AD, Godefroy K, Abduraman O, Assumpta LB, Come EM. Indications for destructive eye surgeries at Yaoundegynae-obstetric and paediatric hospital. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5: 561-5.
7. Su GW, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 20: 274-80.
8. Hansen AB, Petersen C, Heegaard S, et al. Review of 1028 bulbar eviscerations and enucleations. Changes in aetiology and frequency over a 20-year period. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999; 77: 331-5.

9. Viswanathan P, Sagoo MS, Olver JM. National survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91: 616-9.
10. Genevois O, Millet P, Retout A, et al. Comparison after 10 years of two 100-patient cohorts operated on for eviscerations or enucleations. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004; 14: 363-8.
11. Kilmartin DJ, Dick AD, Forrester JV. Prospective surveillance of sympathetic ophthalmia in the UK and Republic of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84: 259-63.
12. Yousuf SJ, Jones LS, Kidwell ED Jr. Enucleation and Evisceration: 20 Years of Experience. Orbit. 2012; 31(4): 211-5.
13. Bekibele CO, Oluwasola AO. A clinicopathological study of orbito-ocular diseases in Ibadan between 1991–1999. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2003; 32(2): 197- 202.
14. Haile M, Alemayehu W. Causes of removal of theeye in Ethiopia. East Afr Med J. 1995; 72 (11): 735-8.
15. United State Eye Injury Register on line. Eye trauma epidemiology and prevention. Access date: 11 March 2015:
16. http://www.useironline.org/ Prevention.htm.
17. Dada T, Ray M, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. A study of the indications and changing trends of evisceration in North India. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 30(2): 120-3.
18. Ibanga A, Asana U, Nkanga D, Duke R, Etim B, Oworu O. Indications for eye removal in southern Nigeria. Int Ophthalmol. 2013; 33(4): 355-60. doi: 10.1007/s10792-012-9700-8. (Epub 2012 Dec 29). 18. Gyasi ME, Amoaku WMK, Adjuik MA. Epidemiology of hospitalized ocular injuries in the Upper East region of Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2007;41(4):171-5.
19. Leonard MP, Andrew L, Beatrice B, et al. Characteristics and causes of penetrating eye injuries reported to the national eye trauma system registry, 1985-91. Public Health Rep. 1993; 108(5): 625-32.
20. Andrew LD, Leonard MP, Ross JB, et al. Penetrating eye injuries in the work place. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110(6): 843-8.
21. Ababneh OH, AboTaleb EA, Abu Ameerh MA, Yousef YA. Enucleation and evisceration at a tertiary care hospital in a developing country. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015; 15: 120. doi: 10.1186/s12886- 015-0108-x.
22. Köylü MT, Gökçe G, Uysal Y, Ceylan OM, Akıncıoğlu D, Günal A. Indications for eye removal surgeries. A 15 year experience at a tertiary military hospital. Saudi Med J. 2015; 36 (10): 1205-9. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.10.12031.