THE MRI FINDINGS IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT
Abstract
Objective: In this study, while evaluating the effectiveness of splint, injection, paraffin and surgical treatment with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), we investigated the consistency between MRI measurements performed by different observers.
Material and Methods: Boston questionnaires were evaluated, and the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the median nerve were measured by two different observers, in 50 hands of 50 patients with idiopathic CTS.
Results: The CSA of the median nerve at the radiocarpal joint level of the canal were significantly larger than the values at the hamate level of the canal when values before treatment and three months after treatment were compared (p<0.001; <0.001 respectively). Measurements of the CSA of the median nerve, taken by the first observer, were found to be significantly lower in the post-treatment period at both the radiocarpal joint and hamate level, compared with the pre-treatment period (p<0.001; 0.002 respectively). Measurements of CSA of the median nerve at the radiocarpal joint and hamate level performed by the observers in the pre- and post-treatment periods, were found to be highly compatible with one another.
Conclusion: MRI is a valuable investigative technique for use with CTS patients, for the diagnosis of idiopathic CTS. When evaluating the efficacy of treatment, measurements of CSA of the median nerve are important, particularly at the proximal regions of the canal. The compatibility between the MRI measurements of the different observers, led us to consider that the measurements were objective.
Keywords
References
- 1. Huisstede BM, Fridén J, Coert JH, Hoogvliet P. Carpal tunnel syndrome: hand surgeons, hand therapists, and physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians agree on a multidisciplinary treatment guideline-results from the European HANDGUIDE Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(12):2253-63.
- 2. Werner R, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(9):1373-81.
- 3. Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC, de Krom M, Franklin G, Franzblau A et al. Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Heal. 1998;88(10):1447-51.
- 4. Aroori S, Spence RAJ. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulster Med J. 2008;77(1):6-17.
- 5. Ibrahim I, Khan WS, Goddard N, Smitham P. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of the recent literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6(1):69-76.
- 6. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome. Jama. 1999;282(2):153-8.
- 7. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology. 2002;58(2):289-94.
- 8. Rask MR. Anterior interosseous nerve entrapment: (Kiloh-Nevin syndrome) report of seven cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(142):176-81.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Rula Şahin
This is me
0000-0002-3044-3510
Türkiye
Tevfik Yetiş
This is me
0000-0001-5543-7144
Türkiye
Nihal Duran
This is me
0000-0003-0841-0699
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 31, 2019
Submission Date
March 28, 2019
Acceptance Date
December 15, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 21 Number: 3