Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ

Year 2019, Volume: 21 Issue: 3, 395 - 405, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.579601

Abstract

Amaç: Ayak bileği
ekleminin ve bu eklemi oluşturan kemik yüzeylerin morfolojik ölçümleri ayak
bileği protez tasarımları için temel kılavuzdur. Çalışmamızın amacı Niğde
bölgesinin sahip olduğu ayak bileği eklemi morfolojik ölçümlerini belirlemek ve
ulusal ayak bileği protez tasarımları geliştirmeyi amaçlayan araştırmacılar
için bir veri kaynağı oluşturmaktır.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Niğde Ömer
Halisdemir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji
polikliniğine
2 Ocak 2018-30 Haziran
2018 tarihleri arasında başvuran ve herhangi bir sebepten dolayı ayak bileği Manyetik
Rezonans Görüntülemesi (MRG) çekilen hastalar geriye dönük olarak incelenmiştir.
Bu görüntülerden ayak bileği boyut ölçümleri, ayak bileği en-boy oranları,
distal tibia eğim ölçümleri ve komplikasyonla ilişkili anatomi ölçümleri ve 15
indekse ait değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır.

Bulgular: Çalışmamızda 100
hastaya ait 100 MRG tetkiki üzerinde ölçümler tamamlanmıştır. Hastalardan 71’i
kadın ve 29’u erkektir. Ortalama yaş tüm çalışma grubunda 43.75±14.80 (14-75),
kadın cinsiyette 44.37±15.06 (14-75) ve erkek cinsiyette 42.24±14.28 (18-73)
olarak bulunmuştur. Tibia ve talus boyut ölçüm parametreleri TiAL, MTiTh, SRTi,
TiW, TaAL, TaW, MalW erkeklerde kadınlara nazaran anlamlı şekilde yüksek
bulunmuştur. Ancak sırası ile tibia ve talus en-boy oranlarını ifade eden
MTiTh/TiW ve TaAL/TaW parametreleri ve komplikasyon ile ilişkili anatomi ölçüm
parametreleri APG, MDV, MDA ve MalW/TiW cinsiyetler arasında anlamlı farklılık
göstermemiştir.







Sonuç: Bu sonuçlar
erkeklerde kadınlara nazaran daha büyük boy protez bileşenlerinin
gerekebileceğini ancak tek tip protez tasarımının her iki cinsiyette de
kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

Supporting Institution

Mevcut değil.

References

  • 1. Kuo CC, Lu HL, Lu TW, Leardini A, Kuo MY, Hsu HC. Validity and reliability of ankle morphological measurements on computerized tomography-synthesized planar radiographs. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):92.
  • 2. Thomas R, Daniels TR, Parker K. Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(3):526-35. 3. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1899-905.
  • 4. Stagni R, Leardini A, Ensini A, Cappello A. Ankle morphometry evaluated using a new semi-automated technique based on X-ray pictures. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(3):307-11.
  • 5. Leardini A. Geometry and mechanics of the human ankle complex and ankle prosthesis design. Clin. Biomech. 2001;16(8):706-9.
  • 6. Easley ME, Vertullo CJ, Urban WC, Nunley JA. Total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10(3):157-67.
  • 7. Giannini S, Romagnoli M, O’Connor JJ, Catani F, Nogarin L, Magnan B et al. Early clinical results of the BOX ankle replacement are satisfactory: a multicenter feasibility study of 158 ankles. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50(6):641-7.
  • 8. Fessy MH, Carret JP, Bejui J. Morphometry of the talocrural joint. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19(5):299-302.
  • 9. Hayes A, Tochigi Y, Saltzman CL. Ankle morphometry on 3D-CT images. Iowa Orthop J. 2006;26(1):1-4.
  • 10. Kwon DG, Sung (1)KH, Chung CY, Park MS, Lee SH, Kim TW et al. Preliminary findings of morphometric analysis of ankle joint in Korean population. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53(1):3-7.
  • 11. Kuo CC, Lu HL, Leardini A, Lu TW, Kuo MY, Hsu HC. Three-dimensional computer graphics-based ankle morphometry with computerized tomography for total ankle replacement design and positioning. Clin Anat. 2014;27(4):659-68.

Morphometric Analysis of Ankle Joint in Niğde Province of Turkey

Year 2019, Volume: 21 Issue: 3, 395 - 405, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.579601

Abstract

Objective: The
modern designs of the total ankle prosthesis systems depend heavily on the
available information on the morphology of the bones of the ankle joint.
However, to our knowledge there is no study describing the characteristics of
ankle morphometry in Turkish population. The aim of the present study was to
determine the morphology of the ankle joint in healthy subjects in Niğde
province of Turkey and to reveal a dataset for the innovation of the national
total ankle prosthetic system designs.

Material and Methods: We
reviewed all ankle Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans of the patients from
the digital archive of our hospital from October 2, 2018 to June 30, 2018 to
obtain 100 eligible ankle MRI scans. Fifteen indexes were measured and size
diversity, aspect (anteroposterior/mediolateral) ratio, distal anteroposterior
inclination angle, and complication-related anatomy of the ankle were
determined.

Results: MRI
of 71 female and 29 male ankles were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age in
the whole study group was 43.75±14.80 (14-75). The size parameters of the tibia
and talus; TiAL, MTiTh, SRTi, TiW, TaAL, TaW, MalW were greater in male group
than in female group significantly. However, aspect ratio parameters of the
ankle MTiTh/TiW and TaAL/TaW and the complication related anatomy parameters
APG, MDV, MDA and MalW/TiW did not differ according to the gender
significantly.







Conclusion: These
results suggest that larger prosthetic components may be required in the total
ankle arthroplasty surgery in males compared to females. However, the same
total ankle prosthesis design should be appropriate in both gender in Niğde
province of Turkey.

References

  • 1. Kuo CC, Lu HL, Lu TW, Leardini A, Kuo MY, Hsu HC. Validity and reliability of ankle morphological measurements on computerized tomography-synthesized planar radiographs. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):92.
  • 2. Thomas R, Daniels TR, Parker K. Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(3):526-35. 3. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1899-905.
  • 4. Stagni R, Leardini A, Ensini A, Cappello A. Ankle morphometry evaluated using a new semi-automated technique based on X-ray pictures. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(3):307-11.
  • 5. Leardini A. Geometry and mechanics of the human ankle complex and ankle prosthesis design. Clin. Biomech. 2001;16(8):706-9.
  • 6. Easley ME, Vertullo CJ, Urban WC, Nunley JA. Total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10(3):157-67.
  • 7. Giannini S, Romagnoli M, O’Connor JJ, Catani F, Nogarin L, Magnan B et al. Early clinical results of the BOX ankle replacement are satisfactory: a multicenter feasibility study of 158 ankles. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50(6):641-7.
  • 8. Fessy MH, Carret JP, Bejui J. Morphometry of the talocrural joint. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19(5):299-302.
  • 9. Hayes A, Tochigi Y, Saltzman CL. Ankle morphometry on 3D-CT images. Iowa Orthop J. 2006;26(1):1-4.
  • 10. Kwon DG, Sung (1)KH, Chung CY, Park MS, Lee SH, Kim TW et al. Preliminary findings of morphometric analysis of ankle joint in Korean population. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53(1):3-7.
  • 11. Kuo CC, Lu HL, Leardini A, Lu TW, Kuo MY, Hsu HC. Three-dimensional computer graphics-based ankle morphometry with computerized tomography for total ankle replacement design and positioning. Clin Anat. 2014;27(4):659-68.
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section ART
Authors

Ubeydullah Sevgili 0000-0003-2201-2080

Ahmet Sinan Sarı 0000-0002-5429-1929

İbrahim Deniz Canbeyli 0000-0003-3880-4779

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Submission Date June 18, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 21 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Sevgili, U., Sarı, A. S., & Canbeyli, İ. D. (2019). NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, 21(3), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.579601
AMA Sevgili U, Sarı AS, Canbeyli İD. NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ. Kırıkkale Uni Med J. December 2019;21(3):395-405. doi:10.24938/kutfd.579601
Chicago Sevgili, Ubeydullah, Ahmet Sinan Sarı, and İbrahim Deniz Canbeyli. “NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 21, no. 3 (December 2019): 395-405. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.579601.
EndNote Sevgili U, Sarı AS, Canbeyli İD (December 1, 2019) NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 21 3 395–405.
IEEE U. Sevgili, A. S. Sarı, and İ. D. Canbeyli, “NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ”, Kırıkkale Uni Med J, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 395–405, 2019, doi: 10.24938/kutfd.579601.
ISNAD Sevgili, Ubeydullah et al. “NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 21/3 (December 2019), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.579601.
JAMA Sevgili U, Sarı AS, Canbeyli İD. NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ. Kırıkkale Uni Med J. 2019;21:395–405.
MLA Sevgili, Ubeydullah et al. “NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, 2019, pp. 395-0, doi:10.24938/kutfd.579601.
Vancouver Sevgili U, Sarı AS, Canbeyli İD. NİĞDE İLİ CİVARINDA YAŞAYAN SAĞLIKLI BİREYLERDE AYAK BİLEĞİ MORFOMETRİK ANALİZ ÖLÇÜMLERİ. Kırıkkale Uni Med J. 2019;21(3):395-40.

This Journal is a Publication of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine.