Publication Ethics

Library, Archive and Museum Research Journal (LAMRe) adheres to the highest standards in publication ethics and adopts ethical publishing principles published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). All submitted articles must be original, unpublished, and not in the process of being evaluated in another journal. Each article is double-blindly reviewed by one of the editors. Plagiarism, duplication, false authorship/denied authorship, research/data fabrication, article slicing, slicing, copyright infringement and concealment of conflict of interest are considered unethical behaviors. All articles that do not comply with accepted ethical standards are removed from the publication. This includes articles with possible irregularities and inconsistencies detected after publication.

Author/s Responsibility

Compliance of the articles with scientific and ethical rules is the responsibility of the authors. The author must provide assurance that the article is original, has not been previously published elsewhere, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in another language. Applicable copyright laws and agreements must be observed. Copyrighted material (for example, tables, figures, or large quotations) should be used with due permission and acknowledgment. The work of other authors, contributors, or references should be used appropriately and cited in references. All authors must have a direct academic and scientific contribution to the submitted article, in this context, “author” is someone who makes a significant contribution to the conceptualization and design of a published research, to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data, to the writing of the article or to its content critical review. seen as. All authors must indicate their rank on the Copyright Agreement Form signed.

In all kinds of studies that require an ethics committee report in our journal, the author(s) are obliged to enter the necessary ethics committee report information when uploading publications to the editorial office and the journal's system. Our journal, editorial board, concessionaire, editorial office, referee and scientific committees do not accept responsibility for a problem that occurs or will occur under any conditions and conditions. The author(s) are obliged to give this information to the journal in writing. All responsibility in this regard belongs to the author(s).

In accordance with the Press and Publication Law "5187", the material and moral damage arising from the acts committed through the printed works, the content and legal responsibility of the publications published in our journal within the scope of m-13-14 rests with the author(s) unilaterally. Our journal, management, referee, editor, scientist and franchisee do not accept these obligations. Studies with scientific content, contributing to the literature and expressing scientific value are accepted and published in our journal. Apart from this, publications with political, political, legal and commercial content that are in violation of the intellectual property rights law are not allowed. In the event of a possible negativity, the author(s) has accepted and assumed in advance all kinds of material and moral damages that may arise.

For this reason, our journal's management and boards do not accept any responsibility for second third parties and other persons and institutions. In this regard, it is out of question to impose a legal sanction on our journal and its boards. The content and current status of the works belong to the author(s), and our journal has undertaken a duty only at the stage of publishing these publications and bringing them to the literature.

Ethical Rules for Referees

Reviewers should be aware that the evaluation process is confidential and should not be shared with third parties.
Every study submitted to the journal should be subjected to impartial evaluation by the referees.
Reviewers must submit a clear and constructive evaluation report on the work within the specified time.
When it is understood that the work is plagiarized or has been previously published elsewhere, the referees should notify the editor.

Ethical Rules for Editorial Team and Editor

The editor and the editorial team keep the referee evaluation process confidential and do not share it with third parties.
Regardless of religion, language, race, gender, nationality, seniority or institutional affiliation, the editor and the editorial team display an impartial attitude to every work submitted to the journal and approved for publication.
In the face of a claim that an article submitted to the journal is plagiarized, is in the process of being published or has been published elsewhere, the journal editor and the editorial team investigate this situation. If the relevant claim is confirmed, the editor does not publish the article.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL

Attention Our Authors!

The TR Index Journal Evaluation criteria have been updated to be implemented as of 2020, and the articles related to the ethics committee permission required for scientific researches have been detailed. The "documents and information requested for studies requiring ethics committee approval", which is stated under the heading of ethical rules, is not expected to be applied for studies submitted in the past, in the process of evaluation or accepted. It will be mandatory for publications whose process begins in 2020.

Publication Fee Policy

Library, Archive and Museum Research Journal (LAMRe) has an open access policy based on the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI).

open access according to BOAI; It is defined as “the ability of scientific literature to be accessed, read, saved, copied, printed, scanned, linked to the full text, indexed, transferred as data to software and used for any legal purpose, without financial, legal and technical barriers through the Internet”.

All works published in LAMRe are open from the date of publication and no fee is charged from those who want to download these works.

LAMRe uses a Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives 4.0 International CC BY-NC-ND)" for all published works.

Peer Review and Completion of the Process

The articles that pass the preliminary evaluation are sent to two referees with doctorate titles for evaluation.

Referee evaluation period is 15 days. 1st warning is sent for arbitrations that are not made within 15 days. An additional 7 days is given. If it is not done again, a 2nd warning and an additional 7 days will be given. If it is not done again, a new referee will be assigned to the article without a third warning.

After the referees accept to evaluate, they download the article from the system. The referee fills the evaluation form on the system. Writes evaluation messages to the author and editor. Marks the evaluation result.

The referees look at the article writing rules, article content, originality and scientificity. An evaluation must be written in the notes to the author and editor. The reason for the rejection of the rejected articles must be written.

The article that receives two acceptances and one revision and one acceptance is accepted directly. The article that receives two revisions is sent for revision. The article that receives a refusal and a correction is sent to the 3rd referee. The decision of the 3rd referee determines the outcome. The article that receives two rejections is directly rejected.

Accepted and corrected articles are sent to the authors, and their final versions, arranged according to the referee's suggestions, are requested. The final versions of the correction areas are sent back to the referees for viewing, if requested by the referees. If the referees see no problem in the article, it is accepted. The final version of the article is requested from the authors within 7 days.

The finalized articles are processed for graphics and layout. PDF versions are sent to the authors for final checking. If there are corrections, they are asked to mark and add notes on the PDF. PDF texts are sent back to the journal. Thus, the process is com

Malpractice Statement
Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais (RCCS) is a peer-reviewed journal committed to ensuring the highest standards of publication ethics. All parties involved in the act of publishing (editors, authors, reviewers and the publisher) have to agree upon standards of ethical behavior. We state the following principles of Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement based on the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors of the Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE (available at http://publicationethics.org/).