Exploring the Impact of Socioeconomic Background on Teacher

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 181 - 195, 23.12.2025

Can Ece Boz , Paşa Tevfik Cephe

https://doi.org/10.35207/later.1717847

https://izlik.org/JA87FY37AY

Abstract

This study examines the impact of teachers’ socioeconomic backgrounds on their identity as teachers by examining how their personal socioeconomic backgrounds shape their professional roles and their relationships with students. Field notes and interviews were used for data collection. This study examines the responsibilities, relationships with students, and perspectives on teaching of teachers from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Qualitative data is derived from their analysis. These findings suggest that teachers from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more creative in their adaptation, creation of inclusive learning environments, and use of resources. More privileged teachers focus more on academic achievement and use of resources. However, they are more interested in the diverse experiences of their students. This study also highlights the importance of professional development programs that address socioeconomic inequalities in education. By recognizing the impact of socioeconomic status on teacher identity, the study provides insights for promoting more equitable environments and developing inclusive teaching policies.

Keywords

Teacher identity , Socioeconomic background , Professional development , Equity in education

References

• Akiba, M. (2011). Identifying program characteristics for preparing pre-service teachers for diversity. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 658–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300304
• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index
• Apple, M. W. (2012). Can education change society? Routledge.
• Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
• Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.
• Bressler, C., & Rotter, C. (2017). The relevance of a migration background to the professional identity of teachers. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n1p239
• Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1643–1647). Elsevier.
• Browman, A., Destin, M., Carswell, K., & Svoboda, R. (2017). Perceptions of socioeconomic mobility influence academic persistence among low socioeconomic status students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.006
• Canrinus, E. T., Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2011). Profiling teachers’ sense of professional identity. Educational Studies, 37(5), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2010.539857
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Chen, H., Sun, W., Han, J., & Liu, Q. (2022). Chinese language teachers’ dichotomous identities when teaching ingroup and outgroup students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 939333. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939333
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge.
• Davidson, C. (2009). Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800206
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
• Freire, P. (1970/1998). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
• Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
• Hwang, H., & Chun, E. (2018). Influence of social perception and social monitoring on structural priming. Cognitive Science, 42(S1), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12604
• Jones, K., McCraney, M., & Aguilar, S. (2020). How socioeconomic status affects instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 7(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v7n1p5
• Kamalulil, E., & Panatik, S. (2021). Socioeconomic status and mental health among low-income employees: A systematic literature review. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(3), 1719–1739. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.20
• Korthagen, F. A., Loughran, J. J., & Russell, T. (2001). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-6
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of California Press.
• Li, I., Mahuteau, S., Dockery, A., & Junankar, P. (2017). Equity in higher education and graduate labour market outcomes in Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1377966
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
• Lubsky, A., & Chikarova, G. (2021). Young teachers’ professional identity in the conditions of social, labor, and digital transformation of Russian society. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9(SPE3), e1266. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nspe3.1266
• McLean, N., & Price, L. (2017). Identity formation among novice academic teachers – A longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6), 990–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1405254
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.).
• Jossey-Bass. Meyer, J., Becker, T., & Dick, R. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.383
• Ncho, C. D., & Wright, S. C. (2013). Health maintenance and low socioeconomic status: A family perspective. Curationis, 36(1), e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v36i1.22
• OECD. (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en
• Olsen, B. (2008). How reasons for entry into the profession illuminate teacher identity development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 23–40.
• Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.
• Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000236934
• Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
• Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006