Research Article

Wait-time in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Context: A Conversation Analytic Perspective

Volume: 3 Number: 1 June 17, 2020
EN TR

Wait-time in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Context: A Conversation Analytic Perspective

Abstract

This study aims to discover to what extent native ESL teachers utilize wait-time in their classes and to what extent wait-time gives way to more student contribution. Wait-time is considered as a part of classroom interactional competence, and relevant utilization of it may improve learning in the classroom. Accordingly, six classroom hours of data were analyzed via Conversation Analysis (CA) and whether teachers implement wait-time or not during their lessons were analyzed qualitatively. The participants of the research are teachers and students in a higher education setting in the UK. In order to analyze the data collected, all the videos were transcribed in accordance with the conventions of the Conversation Analysis (CA). The findings suggest that the teachers frequently implement wait-time in their classes. It has been found that wait-time usually leads to students’ contribution in language classes, which may lead to creating space for interaction and language learning. 

Keywords

Supporting Institution

SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ

References

  1. Alsaadi, N. S. M. & Atar, C. (2019). Wait-time in material and classroom context modes. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(1), 53-69.
  2. Atar, C. (2016). The sequential organization and management of teachers’ other-initiation of clarification in second language classroom contexts. Unpublished PhD thesis, submitted to University of Newcastle upon Tyne, the UK.
  3. Atar, C. & Seedhouse, P. (2018). A conversation-analytic perspective on teacher-led clarification and its implications for L2 teacher training. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 145-166.
  4. Anderson, B. O. (1978). The effects of long wait-time on high school physics pupils' response length, classroom attitudes and achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International 39, 3493A. (University Microfilms No. 78-23, 871)
  5. Anshutz, R. J. (1975). An investigation of wait time and questioning techniques as an instructional variable for science methods student’s microteaching elementary school children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 5978A. (University Microfilms No. 75-06, 131)
  6. Arnold, D. S., Atwood, R. K., & Rogers, V. M. (1973). An investigation of relationships among question level, response level and lapse time. School Science and Mathematics, 73, 591-594.
  7. Arnold, D. S., Atwood, R. K., & Rogers. V. M. (1974). Question and response levels and lapse time intervals. Journal of Experimental Education, 43, 11- 15.
  8. Boeck, M. A., & Hillenmeyer, G. P. (1973, March). Classroom interaction patterns during microteaching: Wait time as an instructional variable. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDO76574)

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Language Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 17, 2020

Submission Date

March 6, 2020

Acceptance Date

April 22, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 3 Number: 1

APA
Süt, A. M. (2020). Wait-time in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Context: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. Language Teaching and Educational Research, 3(1), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.35207/later.698861

Cited By