An Analysis on the Internationalization of the Objectives in English Curriculum

Year 2022, , 1 - 15, 27.06.2022

Muhammet Esad Kuloğlu , Muhammet Öcel

https://doi.org/10.35207/later.954913

Abstract

Recently, the world has become a global village and people have become global citizens. Global elements should be included into the teaching and training of this new type of citizenship. The Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MoNE) has internationalized its curriculums as many other educational institutions did. In this context, it has added global, international and intercultural elements into its curriculums. In this study, learning objectives that exist in MoNE secondary education English curriculum were examined in terms of internationalization. The document analysis method of qualitative research design was mainly adopted to collect and analyze data. According to the findings of the study, (1) the curriculum needs to include more internationalization elements, and (2) the global, international and intercultural elements integrated into objectives of the curriculum did not show a homogenous distribution according to the grades and the themes of the curriculum.

Keywords

internationalization, curriculum, global, international, intercultural

References

• Arslan, A. & Coşkun, A. (2012). Avrupa Dilleri Ortak Çerçeve Programı: Türkiye ve dünyada neler oluyor? AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(12), 1-19.
• Barker, M. (2011). The GIHE good practice guide to internationalising the curriculum. Griffith Institute for Higher Education.
• Board of Education and Discipline (2006). 17th National Education Council. Ankara
• Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
• Council of Europe (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
• Council of Europe (2016). Guide for the development and implementation of curricula for plurilingual and intercultural education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
• Demirel, M. (2009, Mayıs). Yaşam boyu öğrenme ve teknoloji. 9th International Educational Technology Conference (IETC2009), Ankara, Türkiye.
• Dewey, J. (1967). The School and the Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Gündoğdu, K., Çelik, B., Yanar, B.H., Yolcu, O., & Ceylan, V.K. Türkiye’de yükseköğretimde program geliştirme bağlamında uluslararasılaşma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (33), 35-48.
• Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization Remodeled: Definition, Approaches, and Rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5-31.
• Leask, B., 2005. Internationalisation Of The Curriculum And Intercultural Engagement: A Variety Of Perspectives And Possibilities. Australian International Education Conference. Gold Coast, Queensland, 1-9.
• Leask, B. (2012). Internationalisation of the curriculum (IoC) in action a guide. Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
• Vocational Qualification Institute (2015). Turkish Qualifications Framework. Ankara
• Ministry of National Education (2014). Turkish Qualifications Framework. Ankara.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Huberman, M. A., & Huberman, P. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
• Oliva, P.F. & Gordon, W.R. (2018). Program geliştirme. (K. Gündoğdu, Çev.) Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Oxfam. (2006). Education for global citizenship: a guide for schools. Oxford:Oxfam Development Education Program.
• Özdemir, S.M. (2011). Toplumsal değişme ve küreselleşme bağlamında eğitim ve eğitim programları: kavramsal bir çözümleme. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 85-110.