Illustrative Multiple Choice Test Items on the Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives in Assessing and Evaluating Musical Learning

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 59 - 75, 24.06.2021

Almighty C. Tabuena Glinore S. Morales

Abstract

This study identified and annotated appropriate test items using the multiple-choice test item format in the cognitive domain of the taxonomy of educational objectives in assessing and evaluating musical learning through the descriptive-developmental research design. This assessment approach is one of the key skills needed of Music teachers to resolve the learning competencies, difficulties, and diversity of the current curriculum, to assist them in exploring the needs of their students and to provide them with a structure for determining the best and most suitable evaluative methodology in the assessment process. The data were analyzed using Bloom's taxonomy including knowledge, comprehension, analysis, application, synthesis, and evaluation. The annotation for each test item utilized a summary of main ideas and responses for a brief description and discussion in accordance with the cognitive domain and musical concept. Twenty-three illustrative multiple-choice test items were identified and annotated including areas in the Philippine music, Asian music, Western music, and choral works and conducting. Planning classroom tests and assessments requires determining what is to be measured and then defining it precisely so that tasks can be constructed using various relevant measures related to musical learning. This process implied that constructing an assessment requires a clear, concise, and complete direction incorporating the music rudiments and test format according to the behavioral indicators essential in constructing appropriate assessment, that is, an objective test item such as the multiple-choice test item format on the cognitive domain of the taxonomy of educational objectives in assessing and evaluating musical learning.

Keywords

assessment, cognitive domain, multiple-choice test items, musical learning, educational objectives

References

• Abijan, R. N. et al. (1997). Physical education, health and music II. Sampaloc, Manila: St. Augustine Publications, Inc.
• Aburayya, A., Marzouqi, A. Al, Ayadeh, I. Al, Albqaeen, A., & Mubarak, S. (2020). Evolving a hybrid appointment system for patient scheduling in primary healthcare centres in Dubai: Perceptions of patients and healthcare provider. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 11(2), 251-260.
• Aguirre, Jr. D. O., & de Cadiz, G. B. (2013). Instructional materials development manual. Eastern Visayas State University, Tacloban City.
• Asaad, A. S., & Hailaya, W. M. (2004). Measurement and evaluation: Concepts and principles. Manila: Rex Book Store, Inc.
• Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). The taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
• Calmorin, L. P. (2010). Research and statistics with computer. Mandaluyong City: National Books Store.
• Casilang, G. F. et al. (2014). NCBTS specialization – MAPEH. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
• Colwell, R. (1970). The evaluation of music teaching and learning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed). SAGE Publications, Inc.
• Department of Education (2003). DepEd Order No. 79, s. 2003, “Assessment and Evaluation of Learning and Reporting of Students’ Progress in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools”. Pasig City: Department of Education.
• Department of Education (2015). DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015, “Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program”. Pasig City: Department of Education.
• Department of Education (2016). “K to 12 Music Curriculum Guide”. Pasig City: Department of Education.
• Evangelista, T. T., et al. (2014). Active MAPEH 7. Sampaloc, Manila: Magallanes Publishing House.
• Forney, K., & Machlis, J. (2007). The enjoyment of music. USA: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
• Gonzales, C. T., et al. (2008). MAPEH in action III. Sampaloc, Manila: REX Book Store, Inc.
• Hunter College (2020). The writing process: Annotating a text. New York: Dr. Murray and Anna C. Rockowitz Writing Center, Hunter College.
• Kelly, T. F. (2013). Music then and now. USA: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
• Lacia, G. C., et al. (2008). MAPEH in action IV. Sampaloc, Manila: REX Book Store, Inc.
• Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Murray, M. C. (2006). Communicating explanatory synthesis. Perspectives: Teaching Legal Research and Writing, 14(3), 136-138.
• Perez, V. V., et al. (2004). MAPEH-CAT IV. Quezon City: Saint Bernadette Publications, Inc.
• Santiago, N. B., et al. (2014). Active MAPEH 8. Sampaloc, Manila: Magallanes Publishing House.
• Sappe, S. (2020). Differences in knowledge science in Islamic education philosophy perspective. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(1), 1-8.
• Sevilla, C., et. al. (1984). An introduction to research methods. Manila, Philippines: Rex Book Store.
• Shabatura, J. (2013). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to write effective learning objectives. Assignments & Measuring Student Learning. University of Kansas.
• Sinha, M. (2017). Framing multiple choice questions. Business Communication, Institute of Management Technology.
• Stanley, T. D. (2001). Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 131-150.
• Stanley, J. C., & Hopkins, K. D. (1972). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Tabuena, A. C. (2019). Effectiveness of classroom assessment techniques in improving performance of students in music and piano. Global Researchers Journal, 6(1), 68-78.
• Tabuena, A. C. (2020a). A literature review on the construction of a teacher-made assessment tool in music listening response competency for junior high school K to 12 music curriculum. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 8(4), 157-163.
• Tabuena, A. C. (2020b). Development and validation of a Philippine music achievement test in addressing the K to 12 music curriculum learning competencies. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 9(4), 16-25.
• Tabuena, A. C. (2021). Carabo-Cone, Dalcroze, Kodály, and Orff Schulwerk methods: An explanatory synthesis of teaching strategies in music education. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(1), 9-16.
• Tabuena, A. C., & Hilario, Y. M. C. (2021). Research data analysis methods in addressing the K-12 Learning competency on data analysis procedures among senior high school research courses. International Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies, 8(3), 1-7.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Zeng, J., Pang, X., Zhang, L., Medina, A., & Rozelle, S. (2014). Gender inequality in education in China: A meta-regression analysis. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(2), 474-491.