Kendi kaderini tayin kimlerin hakkı?

Year 2009, Issue: 54, 179 - 197, 01.01.2009

Hüseyin Kalaycı

References

• Mehmet Ali Ağaoğulları, Ulus-Devlet ya da Halk Egemenliği (Ankara: İmge, 2006)
• Daniele Archibugi, “A Critical Analysis of the Self-determination of Peoples: A Cos- mopolitan Perspective”, Constellations, Cilt. 10, No. 4, 2003, ss. 488-505.
• Veit Bader, “Citizenship and Exclusion. Radical Democracy, Community and Justice. Or, What Is Wrong with Communitarianism?”, POLITICAL THEORY, Cilt. 23, No. 2, Ma- yıs 1995, ss. 211-246.
• Josette Baer, “Who, Why and How: Assessing the Legitimacy of Secession”, Swiss Poli- tical Science Review, Cilt. 6, No. 3, 2000, ss. 45-69.
• Brian Barry, “The Limits of Cultural Politics”, Review of International Studies, Cilt. 24, 1998, ss. 307-319.
• Viva Ona Bartkus, The Dynamics of Secession (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)
• Rainer Bauböck, “Federal arrangements and minority self-government”, EIF 1.
• Working Paper, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Eylül 2004(a), No. 2, ss. 1-28.
• Rainer Bauböck, “Paradoxes of Self-determination and the Right to Self-government”, IWE Working Paper, Austrian Academy of Sciences, No. 42, Ocak 2004(b), ss. 1-39 .
• Rainer Bauböck, “Why Secession is Not Like Divorce”, Kjell Goldmann, Ulf Hannerz ve Charles Westin (der.), Nationalism and Internationalism in the Post-Cold War Era, (London: UCL Press, 2000), ss. 216-243.
• Rainer Bauböck, “Why Stay Together? A Pluralist Approach to Secession and Federa- tion”, Will Kymlicka ve Wayne Norman (ed.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999), ss. 366-394.
• Michael Billig, Banal Milliyetçilik, Çev. Cem Şişkolar (İstanbul: Gelenek Yayıncılık, 2002).
• Craig Calhoun, “Nationalism, Political Community and the Representation of Society. Or, Why Feeling at Home is not a Substitute for Public Space”, European Journal of Social Theory, Cilt. 2, No. 2, 1999, ss. 217-231.
• Simon Caney, “Self-Government and Secession: The Case of Nations”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Cilt. 5, No. 4, 1997, ss. 351-372.
• Josep Costa, “On Theories of Secession: Minorities, Majorities and the Multinational State”, CRISPP, Cilt. 6, No. 2 (Yaz 2003), ss. 63-90.
• Rita Dhamoon, “‘Cultural’, Intersectionality and Power: Re-thinking the Culture Con- cept”, APSA, 2-5 Eylül 2004, ss. 1-28.
• Jonathan Eastvold, “Toward a Unified Theory of Self-Determination”, APSA, 27- 2.
• Ağustos 2003, ss. 1-34.
• Cilt. 7, No. 2, 2003, ss. 181-197.
• Kai Nielsen, “Liberal Nationalism, Liberal Democracies, and Secession”, The University of Toronto Law Journal, Cilt. 48, No. 2 (Bahar 1998), ss. 253-295.
• Bhikhu Parekh, Çokkültürlülüğü Yeniden Düşünmek. Kültürel Çeşitlilik ve Siyasi Teori (Ankara: Phoenix, 2002), çev. Bilge Tanrıseven
• Alan Patten, “The Autonomy Argument for Liberal Nationalism” Nations and Nationa- lism, Cilt. 5, No. 1, 1999, ss. 1-17.
• Daniel Philpott, “In Defense of Self-Determination” Ethics, Cilt. 105, No. 2, Ocak 1995, ss. 352-385.
• Michel Seymour, “Secession as a Remedial Right”, Inquiry, 2007, yayınlanacak maka- le.
• Jason Sorens, “Introduction: Understanding Secession”, Secession and Democracy (2006), yakında yayınlanacak kitabı
• Stephen Tierney, “The Constituional Accommodation of National Minorities in the UK and Canada: Judicial Approaches to Diversity”, Alain-G. Gagnon, Montserrat Guibernau ve François Rocher (der.), The Conditions of Diversity in Multinational Democracies (Mon- treal: IRPP, 2003), ss. 169-205.
• Thomas S. Ulen, “Secession. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law”, Working paper, No. 55, Temmuz 1997
• Johan D. Van Der Vyver, “Self-determination of the peoples of Quebec under Interna- tional Law”, J. Transnational Law & Policy, Cilt. 10, No. 1, Güz 2000, ss. 1-37.
• Nira Yuval-Davis, Cinsiyet ve Millet (İstanbul: İletişim, 2003)