A Critical Analysis on Women’s Political Representation and its Various Justifications

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 111, 193 - 213, 25.09.2023

Duygu Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.1343295

Öz

Compared to their population in societies, rates of political women’s representation remain very low. The fact that women do not or cannot participate in politics in proportion to their populations constitutes a problem of representation in democracies. It also means that women cannot fully benefit from their rights to vote and to be elected, which are one of fundamental human rights. In the literature, there are studies in greater numbers, focusing on why women should participate in politics. Differing from each other in terms of their theoretical and methodological methods, these studies offer different answers to why women should participate in politics in larger rates. This study examines studies on women’s descriptive and substantive representations in democracies in terms of the meaning of women’s representation and provides a critical analysis of the existing literature. It discusses what women’s
descriptive participation in decision-making and law-making mechanisms means for democracy and women’s representation, what is expected from women’s substantive representation and the effects of these expectations on women’s representation, and the relationship between descriptive and substantive representations of women.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Woman and Politics, Political Participaton, Women’s Representation, Gender Equality

Proje Numarası

yok

Kadınların Politik Temsili ve Farklı Gerekçelendirmeleri Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Analiz

Öz

Kadınların toplumlar içerisindeki nüfuslarına kıyasla siyasi temsildeki oranları çok düşük düzeyde kalmaktadır. Kadınların sayısal olarak nüfusları ile orantılı bir şekilde siyasete katıl(a)mamaları, demokrasilerde bir temsiliyet sorunu oluşturmaktadır. Aynı zamanda bu durum, kadınların en temel insan hakları içerisinde yer alan seçme ve seçilme haklarından da tam olarak faydalanamadıkları anlamına gelmektedir. Literatürde kadınların neden daha fazla sayılarla siyasete katılmaları gerektiğine
odaklanan çalışmalar yer almaktadır. Birbirinden teorik ve metodolojik yöntemleri bakımından farklılaşan bu çalışmalar, kadınların siyasete neden daha fazla oranda katılmaları gerektiğine farklı cevaplar sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma ise, kadınların demokrasilerde nicel ve nitel temsilleri üzerine yapılan çalışmaları kadın temsilinin anlamı bakımından incelemekte ve mevcut literatüre eleştirel bir analiz sunmaktadır. Çalışmada kadınların sayısal olarak karar alma ve yasa yapma mekanizmalarında
yer almalarının demokrasi ve kadın temsili için ne anlama geldiği, kadınların nitel temsillerinden ne beklendiği ve bu beklentilerin kadın temsiline olan etkileri, kadınların nicel ve nitel temsil arasında nasıl bir ilişki olduğunu tartışmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kadın ve Siyaset, Siyasal Katılım, Kadın Temsili, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

yok

Teşekkür

yok

Kaynakça

• Arat, Y. (1989). The patriarchal paradox: women politicians in Turkey. New Jersey, Madison: Fairleig.
• Arat, Y. (1999). Democracy and women in Turkey: in defense of liberalism. Social Politics, Güz, 370-387.
• Baker, K. (2017). Great expectations: gender and political respresentation in the Pacific Islands. Governent and Opposition, (), 1-27.
• BBC News. (2018). The power-sharing dream: where women rule in the world. Erişim adresi: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-44454914. Erişim tarihi: 20.06.2023.
• Berkman, M. B. ve Robert E. O. (1993). Do women legislators matter? Female legislators and state abortion policy. American Politics Quarterly, 21(1), 102-124.
• Bratton, K. A. ve Haynie, K. L. (1999). Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: the effects of gender and race. Journal of Politics, 61(3), 658-679.
• Campbell, D. ve Wolbrecht, C. (2006). See Jane run: women politicians as role models for adolescents. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 233-247.
• Charrad, M. M. (2001). States and women’s rights: the making of postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Childs, S. ve Withey J. (2004). Women representatives acting for women: sex and the signing of early day motions in the 1997 British parliament. Political Studies, 52(3), 552-564.
• Çağlar, N. (2011). Kadının siyasal yaşama katılımı ve kota uygulamaları. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 3(4), 56-79.
• Çakır, S. (2013). Erkek Kulübünde Siyaset. İstanbul: Versus Kitap.
• Dahlerup, D. (2012). Engendering representative democracy. Sonia Alonso, John Keane ve Wolfgang Merkel (ed.). The future of representative democracy içinde. (s. 144-168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. European Platform of Women Scientist. 2012. No modern European democracy without gender equality. Erişim adresi: https://epws.org/no-modern-european-democracy-without-gender-equality-press-release/. Erişim tarihi: 12.05.2023.
• Grey, S. (2002). Does size matter? Critical mass and New Zealands women MPs. Parliamentary Affairs, 55(1), 19-29.
• Htun, M., Lacalle, M. ve Micozzi, J. P. (2013). Does women’s presence change legislative behavior? Evidence from Argentina, 1983-2007. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 5(1), 95-125.
• Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2019). New IPU report shows well-designed quotas lead to significantly more women MPs. Erişim adresi: https://www.ipu.org/news/press-releases/2019-03/new-ipu-report-shows-well-designed-quotas-lead-significantly-more-women-mps. Erişim tarihi: 26.07.2023.
• Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2023). Women in politics: 2023. Erişim adresi: https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/infographics/2023-03/women-in-politics-2023. Erişim tarihi: 10.08.2023.
• International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Gender quotas database. Erişim adresi: https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/gender-quotas/country-overview. Erişim tarihi: 25.07.2023.
• Kassa, S. (2015). Challenges and opportunities of women political participation in Ethiopia. Journal of Global Economics, 3(162), 1-7.
• Kathlene, L. (1995). Alternative views of crime: legislative policymaking in gendered terms. Journal of Politics, 57(3), 696-723.
• Kaymaz, M. M. ve Ünsal, Z. E. (2022). Siyasi temsil ve kadınlar: Yeni Zelanda örneği. Uluslararası Politik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8, Nisan, 35-45.
• Kittilson, M. C. (2006). Challenging parties, changing parliaments. Women and elected office in contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
• Library of Congress. The founders and the vote. Erişim adresi: https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/elections/right-to-vote/the-founders-and-the-vote/. Erişim tarihi: 10.06.2023.
• Little, T. H., Dunn D. ve Deen, R. E. (2001). A view from the top: gender differences in legislative priorities among state legislative leaders. Women and Politics, 22(4), 29-49.
• Luciak, I. A. (2005). Party and state in Cuba: gender equality in political decision making. Politics and Gender, 1(2), 241-263.
• Matland, R. E. ve Brown D. D. (1992). District magnitude’s effect on female representation in the U.S. state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(4), 469–492.
• National Archives of Avustralia. The 1967 Referendum. Erişim adresi: https://www.naa.gov.au/explore-collection/first-australians/other-resources-about-first-australians/1967-referendum. Erişim tarihi: 27.07.2023.
• Norris, P. (1996). Legislative recruitment. Lawrence Leduc, Richard G. Niemi ve Pippa Noris (Ed.). Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in global perspective içinde (s. 184-215). London: Sage.
• Paxton, P. ve Hughes M. M. (2017). Women, politics, and power a global perspective. Los Angeles: SAGE, CQ Press.
• Paxton, P. ve Kunovich S. (2003). Women’s political representation: the importance of ideology. Social Forces, 82(1), 87-113.
• Phillips A. (1995). The Politics of Presence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Rule W. (1987). Electoral systems, contextual factors and women’s opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. Western Political Quarterly, 40(3), 477–498.
• Sawer, M. (2000). Parliamentary representation of women: from discourses of justice to strategies of accountability. International Political Science Review, 21(4), 361-380.
• Schmidt, M. (2002). Demokrasi Kuramlarına Giriş. (çev. M. Emin Köktaş), Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.
• Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2006). Still supermadres? Gender and the policy priorities of Latin American legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 570-585.
• Sitembölükbaşı, Ş. (2007). Kadınların siyasal hayata etkin katılımının bir aracı olarak seçimlerde kota uygulamaları. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 12(1), 13-36.
• Sumbas, A. (2015). Kadının politik temsil meselesi üzerine bir tartışma. İ. Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, 53, Ekim, 103-121.
• Svaleryd, H. (2009). Women’s representation and public spending. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 186-198.
• Swers, M. L. (1998). Are women more likely to vote for women’s issue bills than their male colleagues?. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(3), 435-448.
• Taylor-Robinson, M. M. ve Health, R. M. (2003). Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test. Women and Politics, 24(4), 77-101.
• Tekeli, Ş. (1979). Tü rkiye’de Kadının Siyasal Hayattaki Yeri. Nermin Abadan-Unat (Ed.). Türk Toplumunda Kadın içinde (s. 393–413). Ankara: Tü rk Sosyal Bilimler Derneği.
• Tekeli, Ş. (1982). Kadınlar ve Siyasal Toplumsal Hayat. İstanbul: Birikim.
• Thomas, S. (1991). The impact of women on state legislative priorities. Journal of Politics, 53(4), 958-976.
• Tremblay, M. ve Pelletier, R. (2000). More feminists or more women? Descriptive or substantive representation of women in the 1997 Canadian federal elections. International Political Science Review, 21(4), 381-405.
• Wängnerud, L. (2000). Testing the politics of presence: women’s representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1), 67-91.
• Wängnerud, L. (2009). Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation. The Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 51-69.
• Young, I. M. (2002), Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.