The Influence of Corpus Luteum Size on the Conception in Embryo Transfer Recipient Cows

Year 2021, , 77 - 81, 23.12.2021

Erkan Say , Mehmet Ferit Özmen Hakan Sağırkaya

https://doi.org/10.46897/livestockstudies.610205

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The aim of study was to investigate the effect of corpus luteums (CL) size that detected
before embryo transfer on conception in recipient Holstein cows. The recipient cows utilized had at least one birth and aged 3-8 years old. PGF2α was injected 2 times space 14 days apart to cows and 87 cows which show estrous symptoms were determined as recipient. Fresh embryos were transferred after estrous in 6th-8th days. Ovaries were examined by ultrasound before transfer and CL sizes were measured. A scale of ‘++++’ were set as a result of measurements. Recipient cows were into 3 groups. The first group was named as CL2+ (n=25) and consisted of cows with ‘++’ (≥15-20< mm) size CL. The second group was named as CL3+ (n=52) and consisted of cows with ‘+++’ (≥20-25< mm) size CL. The third group was named as CL4+ (n=10) and consisted of cows with ‘++++’ (≥25 mm) size CL. The embryos were transferred to the uterine horn on the side of the CL (ipsilateral). Pregnancy rate was respectively 36%, 46.2% and 40% for groups. No statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of the effect of CL on conception (P>0.05). As a result, it was concluded that the size of the corpus luteum has no effect on the conception of cows utilized as recipients in embryo transfer.

Keywords

Corpus luteum, Embryo transfer, Recipient cow

References

• Akyol, N. (2001). Using hormon in cattle embryo transfer (Article in Turkish). Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 44(1): 95-104.
• Bülbül, B., Dursun, Ş. (2005). Factors affecting superovulation response in cows (Article in Turkish). Hayvancılık Araştırma Dergisi 15 (1): 16-25.
• Bilby, T.R. Improving fertility in the repeat breeder. http://articles.extension.org/pages /28606/improving-fertility-in-the repeatbreeder#Embryo_Transfer. Erişim Tarihi: 05.05.2017.
• Hasler, J.F., Browen, R.A., Nelson, L.D., Seidel, G.E. (1980). Serum progesterone concentrations in cows receiving embryo transfers. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 58: 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0580071
• Kanagawa, H., Shimohira, I., Saitoh, N. (1995). Manual of bovine embryo transfer. National Livestock Breeding Center MAFF, JICA-Japan, pp: 1-34.
• McGeady, T.A., Quinn, P.J., Fitz Patrick, E.S., Ryan, M.T.
• (2011). Veterinary embryology. Translate: Çelik İ. 1. Baskı. Malatya Medipres Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti. s:96
• Monroy, M.G., Jimenez, C.E., Hernandez, A.V. (2018). Follicular and luteal morphometry, progesterone concentration and early gestation in Holstein cows (Bos Taurus) at high altitude in the tropics (Colombia). Revısta Mvz Cordoba; 23(2).
• Nelson, L.D., Nelson, C.F. (1985). Effect of estrus detection and corpus luteum development on pregnancy rates in bovine embryo recipients. Theriogenology; 23(1):212 (Abstract). https:// doi.org/10.1016/ 0093-691x (85)90118-9.
• Nogueira, M.F.G., Melo, D.S., Carvalho, L.M., Fuck, E.J., Trinco, L.A., Barros, C.M. (2004). Do high progesterone concentrations decrease pregnancy rates in embryo recipients synchronized with PGF2a and eCG? Theriogenology; 61: 1283–1290. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.07.012.
• O'Shea, J.D., 1987. Heterogeneous cell types in the corpus luteum of sheep, goats and cattle. J Reprod Fertil Suppl, 34: 71-85.
• Pabuçcuoğlu, S. Reproduction control and embryo transfer in cows, aves.istanbul.edu.tr/ImageOfByte.aspx?Resim=8&SSNO=7&USER=1653. Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2017. (Article in Turkish).
• Ptaszynska, M. (2009). Reproduction in Ruminants. Translate: Fındık M, Gültiken N, Ay SS et al, 10. Baskı, İstanbul.; s: 25-26.
• Ramsen, L.G., Roussel, J.D. (1982). Pregnancy pates relating to plasma progesterone levels in recipient heıfers at day of transfer. Theriogenoeogy; 18 (3): 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(82) 90149-2.
• Santos, J.E.P., Cerri, R.L.A., Sartori, R. (2008). Nutritional management of the donor cow. Theriogenology; 69: 88–97. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.theriogenology. 2007.09.010.
• Seidel, G.E., Seidel, S.M. Training Manual for embryo transfer in Ccttle, http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/ T0117E/T0117E00.htm. Erişim Tarihi: 26.05.2017.
• Silva, J.C., Costa, L.L., Silva, J.R. (2002). Plasma progesterone profiles and factors affecting embryo-fetal mortality following embryo transfer in dairy cattle. Theriogenology; 58: 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093691x (02)00906-8.
• Singh, J., Pierson, R.A., Adams, G.P. (1997). Ultrasound image attributes of the bovine corpus luteum: structural and functional correlates. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility; 109: 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf. 0.1090035.
• Siqueira, L.G.B., Torres, C.A.A., Souza, E.D., Monteiro, P.L.J., Arashiro, E.K.N, Camargo, L.S.A, Fernandes, C.A..C, Viano, J.H.M. (2009). Pregnancy rates and corpus luteum-related factors affecting pregnancy establishment in bovine recipients synchronized for fixed–time embryo transfer. Theriogenology; 72:949958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. theriogenology.2009.06.013.
• Tekeli, T. (2010). Embryo transfer. Editör: Alaçam E, Obstetric and Infertility in Pets.7. Baskı, Ankara Medisan Yayınları, pp. 81-97. (Book in Turkish).