Current Issue

Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 7/21/24

Year: 2024

MAKU-Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy (JMAE) is an international peer-reviewed e-journal published with the aim of discussing original and qualified studies in the fields of History, Literature, Sociology and Philosophy with a scientific approach. In our time when the relationship between the individual and society is very important, our journal will give priority to publications that take the individual and society into consideration. For this reason, it was decided that the name of the joutnal would be "MAKu-Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy", in reference to Mehmet Akif Ersoy, who was sensitive to social problems throughout his life, worried about them and offered original solution suggestions. Based on the fact that historical, philosophical and sociological perspectives are important in researching and solving social issues, our journal aims to publish publications that prioritize this perspective.

MAKU-Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy (JMAE) publishes academic studies in the fields of History, Literature, Sociology and Philosophy and original articles in these fields.

Articles must be prepared in accordance with the publication format of the APA'7 Publication Manual (http://www.apa.org).

All studies sent to MAKU-Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy must be edited in accordance with the rules specified in this guide prepared in accordance with APA 7. IF THERE ARE RULES IN THIS GUIDE THAT CONFLICT WITH APA 7, THE APA 7 RULES APPLY.

ABSTRACT

Articles should contain 70-200 words of abstract (as Emglish and Turkish.

KEYWORDS

Articles must contain at least 3 keywords.


TITLE LEVELS
Main Title Centered, Bold, and All Words Capitalized

Alternative title Centered, Bold, and First Letters of Words are Capitalized

The text continues from the bottom line without a paragraph break. The main text (body) should be written justified, Times New Roman, 11 point font, single line spaced, and leaving a 6nk space from the last paragraph.

Second Level Title From the Beginning of the Paragraph, Bold, First Letters of Each Word Capitalized

The text continues from the bottom line without a paragraph break. The main text (body) should be written justified, Times New Roman, 11 point font, single line spaced, and leaving the last 6pt space from the paragraph.

Third Level Heading should be written in bold from the beginning of the paragraph, 11 point font, single line spacing and with 6pt space at the end of the paragraph.
The text continues from the bottom line with a paragraph start. The main text (body) should be written justified, Times New Roman, 11 point font, single line spaced, and 6 pt space before the paragraph.

The Fourth Level Heading is one tab from the beginning of the paragraph, written in bold, and ends with a note. The text continues from the line where the title ends with a period. The main text (body) should be written justified, Times New Roman, 11 point, single spaced.

The Fifth Level Heading is one tab from the beginning of the paragraph, is written in bold and italics, and ends with a period. The text continues from the line where the title ends with a period. The main text (body) should be written justified, Times New Roman, 11 point, single spaced.



TABLE
Tables should be numbered with consecutive numbers starting from 1, as Table 1, Table 2, Table 3… The table should be centered and given in bold. The following points should be taken into consideration when preparing the tables.
    • 1 line spacing should be used in tables.
    • The size of the tables should not exceed the writing area.
    • In cases where the table does not fit into the writing area, the font size can be reduced to 8 points. If necessary, the table can be given on a separate page and the page orientation can be adjusted to horizontal.
    • The table number should be given plain and bold above the table, and the name of the table should be given just below the table number. The table number and name should be placed in the middle of the table.


FIGURES
Figures, like tables, should be numbered with consecutive numbers starting from 1, as Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3... The figure should be centered on the page.
The following points should be taken into consideration when preparing the figures.
    • 1 line spacing should be used in figures.
    • The first letters of all the words in the figure name should be capitalized, the others should be lowercase and italicized.
    • The figure number and name should be placed above the figure, centered.
    • The size of the figures should not exceed the writing area.
    • If the figure is taken from a publication, the source must be stated with its full citation next to the figure name.


In-text quotations; The surnames of the authors, the publication date of the work and, in case of direct quotations, the page number should also be added.

Samples
(Balcı, 2001)
(Balcı, 2001, s. 26)
(Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2005)
(Pedhazur & Schmelkin, 1991)

Author order in in-text citations: More than one source within the text; Reference is made according to the alphabetical priority of author names, not the year of publication.
(Pedhazur & Schmelkin, 1991; Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2005)


For more information, you can visit the following sites.

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy
MAKU-Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy (JMAE) endorses the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines and will pursue cases of suspected research and publication misconduct (e.g. falsification, unethical experimentation, plagiarism, inappropriate image manipulation, redundant publication). For further information about COPE please see the website for COPE at http://www.publicationethics.org and journal's Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement in below:


UTIES OF EDITORS AND THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Fair play and editorial independence


Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy or institutional affiliation. Decisions to edit and publish are not determined by the policies of governments or any other agencies outside of the journal itself. The Editor-in-Chief has full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Editors and editorial board members will not use unpublished information disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their own research purposes without the authors’ explicit written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained by editors as a result of handling the manuscript will be kept confidential and not used for their personal advantage. Editors will recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships/connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the papers; instead, they will ask another member of the editorial board to handle the manuscript.

Publication decisions

The editors ensure that all submitted manuscripts being considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are expert in the field. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work in question, its importance to researchers and readers, the reviewers’ comments, and such legal requirements as are currently in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor-in-Chief may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.


DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

Contribution to editorial decisions


Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communications with authors, may assist authors in improving their manuscripts. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication and lies at the heart of scientific endeavour.

Promptness

Any invited referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should immediately notify the editors and decline the invitation to review so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review are confidential documents and must be treated as such; they must not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the Editor-in-Chief (who would only do so under exceptional and specific circumstances). This applies also to invited reviewers who decline the review invitation.

Standards of objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively and observations formulated clearly with supporting arguments so that authors can use them for improving the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors is inappropriate.

Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that is an observation, derivation or argument that has been reported in previous publications should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also notify the editors of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Any invited referee who has conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the manuscript and the work described therein should immediately notify the editors to declare their conflicts of interest and decline the invitation to review so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.

Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the authors. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for the reviewer’s personal advantage. This applies also to invited reviewers who decline the review invitation.



DUTIES OF AUTHORS

Reporting standards


Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed and the results, followed by an objective discussion of the significance of the work. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Review articles should be accurate, objective and comprehensive, while editorial 'opinion' or perspective pieces should be clearly identified as such. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data of their study together with the manuscript for editorial review and should be prepared to make the data publicly available if practicable. In any event, authors should ensure accessibility of such data to other competent professionals for at least 10 years after publication (preferably via an institutional or subject-based data repository or other data centre), provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and legal rights concerning proprietary data do not preclude their release.

Originality and plagiarism

Authors should ensure that they have written and submit only entirely original works, and if they have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited. Publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported in the manuscript should also be cited. Plagiarism takes many forms, from “passing off” another’s paper as the author’s own, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Multiple, duplicate, redundant or concurrent submission/publication

Papers describing essentially the same research should not be published in more than one journal or primary publication. Hence, authors should not submit for consideration a manuscript that has already been published in another journal. Submission of a manuscript concurrently to more than one journal is unethical publishing behaviour and unacceptable.

The publication of some kinds of articles (such as clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided that certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.

Authorship of the manuscript

Only persons who meet these authorship criteria should be listed as authors in the manuscript as they must be able to take public responsibility for the content: (i) made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, data acquisition, or analysis/interpretation of the study; and (ii) drafted the manuscript or revised it critically for important intellectual content; and (iii) have seen and approved the final version of the paper and agreed to its submission for publication. All persons who made substantial contributions to the work reported in the manuscript (such as technical help, writing and editing assistance, general support) but who do not meet the criteria for authorship must not be listed as an author, but should be acknowledged in the “Acknowledgements” section after their written permission to be named as been obtained. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate coauthors (according to the above definition) and no inappropriate coauthors are included in the author list and verify that all coauthors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Authors should—at the earliest stage possible (generally by submitting a disclosure form at the time of submission and including a statement in the manuscript)—disclose any conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed include financial ones such as honoraria, educational grants or other funding, participation in speakers’ bureaus, membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest, and paid expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements, as well as non-financial ones such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs in the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. All sources of financial support for the work should be disclosed (including the grant number or other reference number if any).

Acknowledgement of sources

Authors should ensure that they have properly acknowledged the work of others, and should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately (from conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties) must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Authors should not use information obtained in the course of providing confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, unless they have obtained the explicit written permission of the author(s) of the work involved in these services.

Peer review

Authors are obliged to participate in the peer review process and cooperate fully by responding promptly to editors’ requests for raw data, clarifications, and proof of ethics approval, patient consents and copyright permissions. In the case of a first decision of “revisions necessary”, authors should respond to the reviewers’ comments systematically, point by point, and in a timely manner, revising and re-submitting their manuscript to the journal by the deadline given.

Fundamental errors in published works

When authors discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their own published work, it is their obligation to promptly notify the journal’s editors or publisher and cooperate with them to either correct the paper in the form of an erratum or to retract the paper. If the editors or publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error or inaccuracy, then it is the authors’ obligation to promptly correct or retract the paper or provide evidence to the journal editors of the correctness of the paper.



DISCLAIMER

Neither the editors nor the Editorial Board are responsible for authors’ expressed opinions, views, and the contents of the published manuscripts in the journal. The originality, proofreading of manuscripts and errors are the sole responsibility of the individual authors. All manuscripts submitted for review and publication in MAKU-Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy, go under double-blind reviews for authenticity, ethical issues, and useful contributions. Decisions of the reviewers are the only tool for publication in the journal and will be final.



References

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2011, March 7). Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf

MAKU-Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy Journal is a free journal. The journal does not receive any fee for publication at any stage.


29681

MAKÜ-Mehmet Akif Ersoy Dergisi (MAED),  Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. (CC BY NC)