Research Article

THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES

Number: 66 April 29, 2023
EN TR

THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback types on a group of EFL learners’ writing achievement. It also aimed at investigating their views on these feedback types. The participants of the present study included 40 preparatory school students studying English at a state university in Turkey. The writing instructor, also the researcher of the current study, provided the participants with both direct and indirect corrective written feedback types which were investigated in this study. The study adopted a pretest - posttest design to measure the effects of direct and indirect CF types. The overall findings of the current study revealed that the participants who were provided with direct corrective feedback attained higher test scores compared to the indirect corrective feedback group participants. The participants also mentioned a number of benefits for the feedback types they received during their writing courses.

Keywords

References

  1. Binglan, Z., & Jia, C. (2010). The impact of teacher feedback on the long-term improvement in the accuracy of EFL student writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 28–30.
  2. Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal 1(1), 3-18.
  3. Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H., & Sato, K. (2019). The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing. System, 81, 135-145.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Early Pub Date

July 29, 2023

Publication Date

April 29, 2023

Submission Date

April 7, 2022

Acceptance Date

April 5, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Number: 66

APA
Gümüş, H. (2023). THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 66, 314-338. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1099551
AMA
1.Gümüş H. THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty. 2023;(66):314-338. doi:10.21764/maeuefd.1099551
Chicago
Gümüş, Hüsnü. 2023. “THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, nos. 66: 314-38. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1099551.
EndNote
Gümüş H (April 1, 2023) THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty 66 314–338.
IEEE
[1]H. Gümüş, “THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES”, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, no. 66, pp. 314–338, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.21764/maeuefd.1099551.
ISNAD
Gümüş, Hüsnü. “THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty. 66 (April 1, 2023): 314-338. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1099551.
JAMA
1.Gümüş H. THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty. 2023;:314–338.
MLA
Gümüş, Hüsnü. “THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, no. 66, Apr. 2023, pp. 314-38, doi:10.21764/maeuefd.1099551.
Vancouver
1.Hüsnü Gümüş. THE EFFECT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TYPES ON L2 WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AND EFL LEARNERS’ VIEWS ON THESE FEEDBACK TYPES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty. 2023 Apr. 1;(66):314-38. doi:10.21764/maeuefd.1099551

Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty

33574