MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMEN KİMLİĞİ: ÖLÇEK UYARLAMA VE ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMEN KİMLİKLERİNİ BELİRLEME ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Bu çalışmada, matematik eğitimi alan yazındaki Teacher of Mathematics Identity Scale (ToMI) Türkçeye Matematik Öğretmen Kimliği Ölçeği (MÖKÖ) ismi ile uyarlanmış, Türkçe versiyonu için çeşitli geçerlik ve güvenirlik kanıtları sunulmuştur. Orijinal ölçek 7’li Likert tipinde ve 3 boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Ölçek her bir boyutta 5, toplamda 15 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Ölçek uyarlama çalışmalarında matematik eğitimi alanından iki uzmanın görüşlerinden faydalanılmıştır. Uyarlanan ölçek maddelerinin matematik öğretmen adayları tarafından anlaşılır bulunup bulunmadığını test edebilmek adına farklı sınıf seviyelerinde öğrenim görmekte olan sekiz matematik öğretmen adayı ile grup görüşmesi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu aşamalardan sonra son haline gelen ölçek, İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Programında farklı sınıf seviyelerinde öğrenim görmekte olan 203 matematik öğretmen adayına uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler öncelikle açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonrasında ise doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile test edilmiştir. Bu analizler Türkçeye uyarlanan ölçeğin orijinaline uygun olarak 3 boyutlu yapıda olduğunu göstermiştir. Betimsel analiz sonuçları çalışmaya katılan öğretmen adaylarının ortalamanın biraz üzerinde matematik öğretmenliği öz-yeterliğine ve matematik eğitimi camiasına aidiyete sahip olduklarını göstermiştir. Ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının yüksek seviyede matematik öğretmeni olma hevesine sahip oldukları görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• matematik öğretmen kimliği
• ölçek uyarlama
• öğretmen adayları

Mathematics Teacher Identity: A Study of Scale Adaptation and Investigation of Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematics Teacher Identity

Abstract

In this study, the Teacher of Mathematics Identity Scale (ToMI) in mathematics education literature was adapted to Turkish, and validity and reliability evidence for the adapted scale were presented. The original scale is a 7-point Likert-type scale with 3 dimensions. There are 5 items in each dimension and 15 items total. The opinions of two experts in mathematics education were used in the scale adaptation process. To test whether the items of the adapted scale were found comprehensible by pre-service mathematics teachers, a group interview was conducted with eight pre-service mathematics teachers studying at different grade levels. After these stages, the finalized scale was applied to 203 pre-service mathematics teachers studying at different grade levels in the Elementary Mathematics Education Teaching Program. The obtained data were first tested by exploratory factor analysis and then by confirmatory factor analysis. Analyses revealed that the adapted scale has the same 3 factor structure as the original scale. In addition, the descriptive analysis results showed that the participant pre-service teachers had a slightly above average level of self-efficacy in mathematics teaching, belonging to the mathematics education community, and a high level of enthusiasm to be a mathematics teacher.

Keywords

• teacher of mathematics identity
• scale adaptation
• preservice teachers

References

1. Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
2. Andersson, A. (2010). Making sense of critical mathematics teaching. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 37-44). MERGA.
3. Arslan, O. (2018). Mathematics teacher identity development of early career middle grade mathematics teachers and the role of participated communities (Doktora Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Türkiye.
4. Arslan, O., Haser, Ç., & Van Zoest, L. (2022). The mathematics teacher identity of two early career mathematics teachers and the influence of their working communities on its development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(4), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09498-0
5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (9th edition). W. H. Freeman and Company.
6. Beauchamp, C. & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: an overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
7. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C. & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
8. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (1st edition). Guilford Press.

9. Chronaki, A. & Matos, A. (2014). Technology use and mathematics teaching: Teacher change as discursive identity work. Learning, Media & Technology, 39(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.776076
10. Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
11. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değiskenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları (2. baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
12. Da Ponte, J. P. & Brunheira, L. (2001). Analysing practice in pre-service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3, 16–27.
13. Da Ponte, J. P., Oliveira, H. & Varandas, J. M. (2002). Development of pre-service mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge and identity in working with information and communication technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015892804607
14. Darragh, L. (2016). Identity research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9696-5
15. De Freitas, E. (2008). Troubling teacher identity: Preparing mathematics teachers to teach for diversity. Teaching Education, 19(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210701860024
16. DeVillis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. SAGE Publications.
17. Flores, M. A. & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002
18. Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 177–211. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049277.40453.4b
19. Hambleton, R. K. (2004). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-37). Psychology Press.
20. Hanley, U. & Darby, S. (2006). Working with curriculum innovation: Teacher identity and the development of viable practice. Research in Mathematics Education, 8, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520158
21. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Tabach, M. & Nachlieli, T. (2016). Opportunities for learning given to prospective mathematics teachers: between ritual and explorative instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 547-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9311-1
22. Hodges, T. E. & Cady, J. A. (2013). Blended-format professional development and the emergence of communities of practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0065-0
23. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24. Izadinia, M. (2013). A review of research on student teachers’ professional identity. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 694-713. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01411926.2012.679614
25. Jong, C. (2016). Linking reform-oriented experiences to teacher identity: The case of an elementary mathematics teacher. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.947398
26. Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the Simplis command language. Scientific Software International.
27. Kaasila, R. (2007). Mathematical biography and key rhetoric. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9085-1
28. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using Lisrel for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. SAGE Publications.
29. Losano, L., Fiorentini, D. & Villarreal, M. (2018). The development of a mathematics teacher’s professional identity during her first year teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21, 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9364-4
30. Lutovac, S. & Kaasila, R. (2018). Future directions in research on mathematics-related teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9796-4
31. Lutovac, S. & Kaasila, R. (2019). Methodological landscape in research on teacher identity in mathematics education: A review. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1009-2
32. Matteson, S. M., Ganesh, B. S., Coward, F. L. & Patrick, P. (2012). Middle level pre-service mathematics teachers’ mental representations of classroom floor plans. Teaching Education, 27(4), 429-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.672407
33. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/StPrg/Ogretmenlik_Meslegi_Genel_Yeterlikleri.pdf
34. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı. MEB. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201813017165445-MATEMAT%C4%B0K%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%202018v.pdf
35. Mosvold, R. & Bjuland, R. (2016). Positioning in identifying narratives of/about pre-service mathematics teachers in field practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.005
36. Neumayer-Depiper, J. (2013). Teacher identity work in mathematics teacher education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(1), 9–15.
37. Ntow, F. D. & Adler, J. (2019). Identity resources and mathematics teaching identity: An exploratory study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01025-z
38. Oslund, J. A. (2016). After the elementary mathematics teacher workshop: Stories of becoming complex instruction teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 116(3), 437–458. https://doi.org/0013-5984/2016/11603-0005
39. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rd edition). Open University Press.
40. Saran, R. & Gujarati, J. (2013). Moving toward positive mathematics beliefs and developing socio-mathematical authority: Urban pre-service teachers in mathematics methods courses. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 9, 100–111.
41. Schutz, P. A., Cross, D. I., Hong, J. Y. & Osbon, J. N. (2007). Teacher identities, beliefs, and goals related to emotions in the classroom. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in Education (pp. 223-241). Academic Press.
42. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th edition). Pearson.
43. van de Vijyer, F. J. R. & Poortinga, Y. H. (2004). Conceptual and methodological issues in adapting tests. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 39-63). Psychology Press.
44. Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J. V. (2005). Mathematics teacher identity: A framework for understanding secondary school mathematics teachers’ learning through practice. Teacher Development, 9(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530500200258
45. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
46. Willis, R., Lynch, D., Peddell, L., Yeigh, T., Woolcot, G., Bui, V., Boyd, W., Ellis, D., Markopoulos, C., & James, S. (2021). Development of a teacher of mathematics identity (ToMI) scale. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00391-w