Research Article

A NEED-BASED APPROACH TO WELL-AND ILL-BEING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS

Number: 54 April 29, 2020
TR EN

A NEED-BASED APPROACH TO WELL-AND ILL-BEING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the varying functions of basic needs satisfaction in predicting well-and ill-being among college students using a choice theory based perspective. A sample of 1150 college students completed self-report measures of Satisfaction with Life Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Beck Depression Inventory, and University Students’ Basic Needs Scale. Path analysis model was performed to analyze the predictive relationships between research variables. Findings provided supportive evidence for the major hypothesis of choice theory that as the basic needs satisfaction increases, the well-being increases, and the ill-being decreases as well. However, functions of the basic needs varied in predicting well-and ill-being. Actually, basic needs satisfaction was more effective in predicting subjective well-being in comparison to depressive symptoms. Freedom need emerged as the foremost variable in predicting subjective well-being, and in predicting depression. Additionally, although fun need had a unique contribution to subjective well-being in the path analysis model, its moderate contribution decreasingly disappeared in predicting depression with the combined effect of partial correlations specifically including freedom and love and belonging needs. 

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, S. M. (1990). Psychometric properties of the boredom proneness scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 963–966. doi: 10.2466/PMS.71.7.963-966
  2. Altintas, E., Benedetto, G. D., & Gallouj, K. (2017). Adaptation to nursing home: The role of leisure activities in light of motivation and relatedness. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 70, 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.12.004
  3. Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thogersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1459-1503. doi: 10.1177/0146167211413125
  4. Basabe, N., Paez, D., Valencia, J., Gonzalez, J. L., Rime, B., & Diener, E. (2002). Cultural dimensions, socioeconomic development, climate, and emotional hedonic level. Cognition and Emotion, 16(1), 103-125. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000158
  5. Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.
  6. Brenneisen Mayer, F., Souza Santos, I., Silveira, P.S.P., Itaqui Lopes, M.H., de Souza, A.R.N.D., Campos, E.P., de Abreu, B.A.L., Hoffman II, I., Magalhães, C.R., Lima, M.C.P. et al. (2016). Factors associated to depression and anxiety in medical students: A multicenter study. BMC Medical Education, 16(1):282.
  7. Britton, P. C., Van-Orden, K. A., Hirsch, J. K., & Williams, G. C. (2014). Basic psychological needs, suicidal ideation and risk for suicidal behavior in young adults. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 44(4), 362-371. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12074
  8. Butterworth P, Rodgers B, & Windsor T. D. (2009). Financial hardship, socioeconomic position and depression: Results from the PATH Through Life Survey. Social Science & Medicine, 69(2), 229-237. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.008

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 29, 2020

Submission Date

November 7, 2019

Acceptance Date

April 22, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Number: 54

APA
Türkdoğan, T., & Duru, E. (2020). A NEED-BASED APPROACH TO WELL-AND ILL-BEING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 54, 435-460. https://izlik.org/JA53LL74SX

Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty

33574