THE QUEST FOR CULTURAL SURVIVAL IN ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA

Year 2021, Volume: 14 Issue: 34, 763 - 778, 10.06.2021

Timucin Bugra Edman Hacer Gözen Lowra Dzekem

https://doi.org/10.12981/mahder.859656

Abstract

In Antony and Cleopatra, William Shakespeare highlights the cultures of the East and the West. The play reveals the quest for cultural survival between the East and the West as a major factor that stirs cultural complexities. The unrighteous representation of the Eastern culture shows the complex nature of multiculturalism the canonical writers strove to represent in their writings. This study seeks to substantiate the challenges that confront cultural expressions in the multicultural atmosphere Shakespeare highlights in Antony and Cleopatra, as well as how the minority culture shapes this context of cultural plurality. Similarly, a comparative analysis of Cultural Studies, cultural history, cultural identity, cultural ‘contents,’ and the literary work Antony and Cleopatra will be the subject matter in this study. Moreover, the goal of this study is to examine how Shakespeare promotes Western culture through the adoringly and adorningly illustrated West with a blemished and contemptuous portrayal of the East in his play. Comparatively, we examine how Shakespeare evinces the triumvirs as the powerful three (Antony, Caesar and Lepidus) and, on the other hand, how he associates Cleopatra with the East.

Keywords

Sexual power, cultural identity, subjected history, interculturalism, misrepresentation

ANTONY VE CLEOPATRA’DA KÜLTÜREL YAŞAM ARAYIŞI

Abstract

Antony ve Kleopatra’da William Shakespeare Doğu ve Batı kültürlerini vurgular. Oyun, Doğu ve Batı arasındaki kültürel hayatta kalma arayışını, kültürel karmaşıklıkları harekete geçiren metinlerinde ortaya koyduğu çok kültürlülüğün karmaşık doğasını göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, Shakespeare'in Antony ve Kleopatra'da vurguladığı çok kültürlü atmosferde kültürel ifadelerde karşılaşılan zorlukları ve azınlık kültürünün bu kültürel çoğulculuk bağlamını nasıl şekillendirdiğini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Benzer şekilde, Kültürel Çalışmalar, kültürel tarih, kültürel kimlik, kültürel 'içerikler' ile edebi eser olan Antony ve Kleopatra'nın karşılaştırmalı analizi bu çalışmanın konusu olacaktır. Dahası, bu çalışmanın amacı, Shakespeare'in oyununda Doğu'nun çirkin ve aşağılayıcı tasviriyle birlikte, hayranlık uyandırıcı ve süslü Batı tasviri aracılığıyla Batı kültürünü nasıl yücelttiğini incelemektir. Shakespeare'in, hükümdarlarının (Antonius, Caesar ve Lepidus) nasıl güçlü üçlü olarak ortaya çıktıkları ve diğer yandan Kleopatra'nın Doğu ile nasıl ilişkilendirildiği karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenecektir.

Keywords

Cinsiyet gücü, kültürel kimlik, mahkum edilmiş tarih, yanlış betimleme, kültürlerarasılık

References

• Adorno, T. W. (1973). The Jargon of authenticity. (Trans. Knut Tarnowski and Frederic Will, Evanston), IL: Northwestern University Press.
• Althusser, L. (2017). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Literary Theory: An Anthology. (Eds.: Julie Rivkin, and Michael Ryan), UK: Wiley Blackwell publishing (John Wiley & Sons), 768-777.
• Bhabha, Homi K. (1994). Cultural diversity and cultural differences. Post-Colonial Studies Reader. (Eds.: Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin), Taylor & Francis Group.
• Burney, S. (2012). CHAPTER ONE: Orientalism: The making of the other. Counterpoints, 417, 23–39.
• Cashmore, E. (2004). Encyclopedia of race and ethnic studies. London and New York: Routledge.
• Christopher, D. (1999). British culture: An introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
• Fanon, F. (2004). The wretched of the earth. (Translated from the French by Richard Philcox with commentary by Jean-Paul Sartre and Homi K Bhabha), New York: Grove Press.
• Grenfell, D. (2014). Diversity and the discourses of security and interventions. The SAGE Handbook of Globalization, (Ed.: Manfred Steger; Paul Battersby; Joseph Siracusa), London: Sage.
• Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, (Ed.: J. Rutherford), London: Lawrence & Wishart.
• Homi K. B. (ed.). (1990). Nation and narration. London and New York: Routledge.
• Jeoung, H. (2003). An Africanist-orientalist discourse: the other in Shakespeare and Hellenistic tragedy. Louisiana State University Doctoral Dissertations. Comparative Literature (Interdepartmental Program) https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1532
• Lindholm, C. (2008). Culture and authenticity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
• Ortmeier, L. (2008). Translating orientalism: Modes of producing the oriental other in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
• Petković, D. (2004). Shakespeare, culture, new historicism. Linguistics and Literature, 3 (1), 139-149. Shakespeare, W. (2005). Antony and Cleopatra. USA: Icon Classics
• Simal, B. (2002). “The Cariboo Café” as a border text: The holographic model Benito. Literature and Ethnicity in the Cultural Borderlands, (Eds.: Jesus Benito, Ana María Manzanas), NY: Rodopi.
• Storry, M - Child P. (Eds.). (2002). British cultural studies. London and New York: Routledge.
• Turner, G. (2014). British cultural studies: An introduction. London and New York: Figueroa Press.
• Virtanen, R. (1986). The spectre of solipsism in western literature. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, Spring, Vol. 19, No. 1, 59-76.