Using lichens for determination of the air pollution

Year 2010, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 73 - 85, 01.12.2010

Özge Tufan-çetin Hüseyin Sümbül

Abstract

Pollutants that lead to the air pollution can occur in very different forms. Therefore, developing an equipment which measures for each pollutants at night and day is highly difficult. Many of the pollutant measurements can be done in places known as pollutant source and for limited numbers of pollutants. However, we want to be sure that the air on our living area is clean. Because of that, a mesuarement instrument that is cheap, usable in everywhere and effective to a great number of the pollutants is needed. Especially epiphytic lichens that can particularly do this duty are very good agents. They are sensitive to the plenty vary of the pollutants, able to be found or brought everywhere. While the measurements of the devices for air pollution give instant information, the biomonitoring studies with lichens for a region inform belongs to long term period. Because of these reasons, lichens are the most employed biological indicator in air pollution biomonitoring studies in the world. In this text, the information and used methods were stated about the determination of the air pollution with lichens.

Keywords

Biological indicator, Air pollution, Lichens.

Hava kirliliğinin belirlenmesinde likenlerin kullanımı

Abstract

Pollutants that lead to the air pollution can occur in very different forms. Therefore, developing an equipment which measures for each pollutants at night and day is highly difficult. Many of the pollutant measurements can be done in places known as pollutant source and for limited numbers of pollutants. However, we want to be sure that the air on our living area is clean. Because of that, a mesuarement instrument that is cheap, usable in everywhere and effective to a great number of the pollutants is needed. Especially epiphytic lichens that can particularly do this duty are very good agents. They are sensitive to the plenty vary of the pollutants, able to be found or brought everywhere. While the measurements of the devices for air pollution give instant information, the biomonitoring studies with lichens for a region inform belongs to long term period. Because of these reasons, lichens are the most employed biological indicator in air pollution biomonitoring studies in the world. In this text, the information and used methods were stated about the determination of the air pollution with lichens.

Keywords

Biological indicator, Air pollution, Lichens.

References

• Anonim (2009a). Adalet Bakanlığı Resmi Sitesi, http://www.mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr/html /20742.html)
• Anonim (2009b). Çevre ve sağlık, Sağlık Bakanlığı Resmi Sitesi, http://www.saglik bakanligi.com/html_files/bilgi/CEVRE_VE_SAGLIK/CVS-5.htm
• Anonim (2001). Hava Kirliliğine Genel Bakış. Refik Saydam Hıfzıssıhha Merkezi Başkanlığı, Çevre Sağlığı Araştırma Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
• Asta, J., Erhardt, W. Ferretti, M. Fornasier, F., Kirschbaum, U., Nimis, P. L., Purvis, O. W.
• Pirintsos, S., Scheidegger, C., Van Haluwyn C. & Wirth, V. (2003). European
• Guideline for Mapping Lichen Diversity as an Indicator of Environmental Stres.
• Bychek-Guschina, I. A., Kotlova, E. R. & Heipieper, H. (1999). Effects of sulphur dioxide on lichen lipids and fatty acids. Biochemistry, 64 (1), 61–65.
• Carreras, H. A., Wannaz, E. D. & Pignata M. L. (2009). Assessment of human health risk related to metals by the use of biomonitors in the province of Co´rdoba, Argentina, Environmental Pollution, 157, 117–122.
• Chant,L. A., Andrews, H. R., Cornett, R. J. Koslowsky V., Milton J. C. D., Van Den Berg, G. J., Verburg, T. G. & Wolterbeek, H. T. (1996). 129I and 36Cl concentrations in lichens collected in 1990 from three regions around Chernobyl. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 47, (9-10), 933-937.
• Conti, M. E., & Cecchetti G. (2001). Biological monitoring: lichens as bioindicators of air pollution assessment-a review. Environmental Pollution, 114 (3), 471-492.
• Corrêa, S. M., & Arbillab, G. (2006) Aromatic hydrocarbons emissions in diesel and biodiesel exhaust. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 6821–6826.
• Doğrul, A., Akyol, N. H., Yolcubal, İ. & Çobanoğlu, G. (2007). Kocaeli ili çevresinde atmosferik ağır metal çökeliminin karayosunu ve liken analizi yöntemiyle belirlenmesi, 60. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı, (16-22 Nisan 2007)Bildirileri, Ankara.
• EPA (2009). Enviroment Protect Agency Resmi Sitesi, www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html
• Garty, J., Kauppi, M. & Kauppi, A. (1995). Differential responses of certain lichen species to sulphur-containing solutions under acidic conditions as expressed by the production of stress ethylene. Environmental Research, 69, 132–143.
• Geiser, L. H. & Neitlich, P. N. (2007). Air pollution and climate gradients in western Oregon and Washington, Indicated by epiphytic macrolichens. Environmental Pollution, 145, 203-218.
• Hauck, M. & Jurgens, S. R. (2008). Usnic acid controls the acidity tolerance of lichens. Environmental Pollution, 156, 115-122.
• Hauck, M., Jurgens, S., Brinkmann, M.& Herminghaus, S. (2008) Surface Hydrophobicity Causes SO2 Tolerance in Lichens, Annals of Botany 101 (4), 531–539.
• Heller-Zeisler, S. F., Zeisler, R., Zeiller E., Parr, R. M., Radecki, Z., Burns, K. I. & De Regge P. (1999). Report on the intercomparison run for the determination of trace and minor elements in lichen material IAEA-336. Section for Nutritional and Health- related Environmental Studies, International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health and Analytical Quality Control Services, Agency’s Laboratories, Seibersdorf.
• Munzi, S., Ravera, S. & Caneva, G. (2007). Epiphytic lichens as indicators of environmental quality in Rome, Environmental Pollution, 146, 350-358.
• Nash, T. H. (1996). Lichen Biology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
• Ozdemir, A. (1992). Hava Kirliliği ve Likenler. Ekoloji, 3, 18-21.
• Öztürk, M. (2005). Şehir içi bölgelerde hava kirliliğinin sağlık üzerine etkileri, Çevre Bakanlığı, Ankara.
• Palomäki,V., Tynnyrinen, S. & Holopainen,T. (1992). Lichen transplantation in monitoring fluoride and sulphur deposition in the surroundings of a fertilizer plant and a strip mine at Siilinjärvi, Annales Botanici Fennici, 29, 25-34.
• Policnik, H. Primoz, S. & Batic, F. (2008). Monitoring air quality with lichens: A comparison between mapping in forest sites and in open areas. Environmental Pollution, 151, 395-400.
• Sarret, G., Manceau, A., Cuny, D., Van Haluwyn, C., Deruelle, S., Hazemann, J. L., Soldo, Y., Eybert-Bérard, L. & Menthonnex, J. J. (1998). Mechanism of lichen resistance to metallic pollution. Environmental Science & Technology, 32, 3325-3330.
• Saunders, P. J. W. (1970). Air pollution in relation to lichens and fungi. Lichenologist, 4, 337- 349.
• Shirtcliffei N. J., Pyatt, F. B., Newton, M.I. & McHale, G. A. (2006). Lichen protected by a super-hydrophobic and breathable structure, Journal of Plant Physiology, 163, 1193- 1197.
• Sommerfeldt, M. & John, V. (2001). Evaluation of a method for the reassessment of air
• quality by lichen mapping in the city of Izmir, Turkey, Turkish Journal of Botany, 25, 45-55.
• US Forest Service (2010). United States Forest Service Web Site, National Lichens & Air
• Quality Database and Clearinghouse http://gis.nacse.org/lichenair/index.php
• WHO (2006). Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Global update 2005-Summary of risk assessment, İsviçre.
• Yenisoy-Karakas S. & Tuncel, S. G. (2004). Geographic patterns of elemental deposition in
• the Aegean Region of Turkey indicated by the lichen, Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th.
• Fr., The Science of the Total Environment, 329 (1), 43-60.
• Zschau, T., Getty, S., Gries, C., Ameron, Y., Zambrano, A. & Nash, T. H. (2003). Historical and current atmospheric deposition to the epilithic lichen Xanthoparmelia in Maricopa Country, Arizona, Environmental Pollution, 125 (1), 21-30.