Research Article

Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025)

Volume: 13 Number: 2 June 30, 2026

Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025)

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the collective bargaining gains achieved over seven distinct periods (spanning 2012–2025) within the Local Government Services branch. Utilizing the MAXQDA 24 qualitative data analysis software, the study examines the collective agreement outcomes for public servants who lack the right to strike. The evaluated bargaining issues are categorized into four primary themes: (i) practices specific to fire and municipal police personnel, (ii) regulations concerning other public servants in municipalities, (iii) social balance agreements and recommendations, and (iv) prospective agendas for future implementation. Throughout these seven consecutive bargaining cycles, significant resolutions have been reached, particularly regarding wage indexation. However, the findings suggest that the absence of a legal right to strike, coupled with the mandatory jurisdiction of the High Arbitration Board in cases of deadlock, inherently constrains the bargaining power of public servants. Furthermore, the recurrent inclusion of identical provisions across multiple agreements and the requirement to renew social balance agreements in each period are identified as institutional disadvantages for these public servants. Notably, the persistent inclusion of ambiguous provisions—exemplified by the phrase 'further studies shall be conducted'—concerning specific labor issues across consecutive agreements is perceived to undermine the professional well-being of public servants and erode their confidence in the collective bargaining process.

Keywords

References

  1. Atay, Y. Ş. (2015). Kamu görevlileri toplu sözleşmesinin hukuki niteliği. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 48(3), 1–39.
  2. Babalola, S. S., & Ishola, A. (2017). Perception of collective bargaining and satisfaction with collective bargaining on employees’ job performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(2), 296–301.
  3. Balcı, B. (2023). Kamu görevlileri toplu pazarlık sürecinde sosyal medya kullanımı. Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(3), 33–43.
  4. Baycık, G. (2019). Sosyal diyalog, örgütlenme özgürlüğü ve toplu sözleşme hakkına ilişkin ILO ve AB standartlarına uyum değerlendirmesi ve öneriler. Çalışma Hayatında Sosyal Diyaloğun Geliştirilmesi Projesi.
  5. Besamusca, J., & Tijdens, K. (2015). Comparing collective bargaining agreements for developing countries. International Journal of Manpower, 36(1), 86–102.
  6. Burchill, F. (1997). Labour relations (2nd ed.). Macmillan Education.
  7. Cengiz, İ. (2019). Türk hukukunda kamu görevlileri sendikaları. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 40, 193–211.
  8. Cerev, G. (2014). Türkiye’de kamu çalışanlarının örgütlenme mücadelesinin hukuksal gelişim süreci: 6289 sayılı Kanun ve sendikal haklara etkileri. Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 5(2), 24–39.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Corporate Social Responsibility

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2026

Submission Date

August 2, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 1, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 13 Number: 2

APA
Tiyek, R. (2026). Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025). Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 13(2), 593-612. https://izlik.org/JA96FH64RW
AMA
1.Tiyek R. Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025). MAKU IIBFD. 2026;13(2):593-612. https://izlik.org/JA96FH64RW
Chicago
Tiyek, Ramazan. 2026. “Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025)”. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty 13 (2): 593-612. https://izlik.org/JA96FH64RW.
EndNote
Tiyek R (June 1, 2026) Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025). Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty 13 2 593–612.
IEEE
[1]R. Tiyek, “Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025)”, MAKU IIBFD, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 593–612, June 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA96FH64RW
ISNAD
Tiyek, Ramazan. “Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025)”. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty 13/2 (June 1, 2026): 593-612. https://izlik.org/JA96FH64RW.
JAMA
1.Tiyek R. Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025). MAKU IIBFD. 2026;13:593–612.
MLA
Tiyek, Ramazan. “Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025)”. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, vol. 13, no. 2, June 2026, pp. 593-12, https://izlik.org/JA96FH64RW.
Vancouver
1.Ramazan Tiyek. Challenges and Repetitions in Collective Bargaining Without the Right to Strike: Evidence from the Local Government Services Sector (2012-2025). MAKU IIBFD [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 1;13(2):593-612. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA96FH64RW

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author(s) bear full responsibility for the ideas and arguments presented in their articles. All scientific and legal accountability concerning the language, style, adherence to scientific ethics, and content of the published work rests solely with the author(s). Neither the journal nor the institution(s) affiliated with the author(s) assume any liability in this regard.