Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

YÜKSEK TEKNOLOJİLİ ÜRÜN İHRACATI VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 865 - 884, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.526828

Abstract

Küreselleşen
dünya ekonomisinde uluslararası ticaret hacminin giderek yükselmesi dikkate
alındığında, teknolojik gelişmenin ülkelerin uluslararası ticaretlerinde ve
ekonomik büyümelerinde önemli derecede etkiye sahip olacağı öngörülmektedir. Bu
doğrultuda, ülkelerin teknolojik gelişmelerinin teknolojik ürün ihracatına olan
etkisini ve hangi sektörlerdeki teknolojik ürün ihracatının ülkelerin ekonomik
büyümelerine daha etkin şekilde katkı sağlayacağını ortaya koyacak çalışmalar
önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışma ile Türkiye’de sektörel olarak yüksek
teknolojili ürün ticareti ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki
araştırılacaktır. Bununla birlikte çalışmanın ana hedefi, Türkiye’nin hangi
sektörlerdeki teknolojik ürün ticaretinin ekonomik büyümeye daha fazla katkı
sağladığının tespit edilmesidir. Böylelikle, Türkiye’de ekonomik büyümeye en
çok katkı sağlayan yüksek teknoloji sektörleri belirlenecektir. Çalışma
kapsamında gerçekleştirilen analizler sonucunda, Türkiye’nin yüksek teknoloji
sektörlerinden sırasıyla kimya endüstrisi, elektrik makineleri ve aparatları
endüstrisi, silah sanayi, elektronik ve haberleşme endüstrisi ve bilimsel
araçlar endüstrisi ihracatlarında uzmanlaşması durumunda ekonomik büyüme
düzeyinin daha fazla arttığı tespit edilmiştir. 

References

  • AGHION, P. and HOWITT, P. (1992), A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351.
  • ALPER, A. E. (2017), Türkiye’de Patent, Ar-Ge Harcamaları, İhracat ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Bayer-Hanck Eş Bütünleşme Analizi, 3. Uluslararası Politik, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Kongresi, 17-26.
  • ARROW, K. J. (1962), The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.
  • BBAALE, E. and MUTENYO, J. (2011), Export Composition and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa A Panel Analysis, Consilience, (6), 1-19.
  • DEĞER, M. K. (2010), İhracatta Ürün Çeşitliliği Ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Türkiye Deneyimi (1980-2006), Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 259-287.
  • DICKEY, D. A. and FULLER, W. A. (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.
  • ELLIOT, G., ROTHENBERG, T. J. and STOCK, J. H. (1996), Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root, Econometrica, 64, 813-836.
  • ENDERS, W. (2003), Applied Econometric Time-Series, 2nd Edition, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • ENGLE, R. F. and GRANGER, C. W. J. (1987), Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Es¬timation and Testing, Econometrica, 55(1), 251- 276.
  • GROSSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1989), Comparative Advantage and Long-Run Growth, The American Economic Review, 80(4), 796-815.
  • GROSSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • HATZICHRONOGLOU, T. (1997), Revision of The High-Technology Sector And Product Classification, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • HERZER, D. and NOWAK-LEHNMANN, F. D. (2006), What does export diversification do for growth? An econometric analysis, Applied Economics, 38, 1825–1838.
  • HESSE, H. (2008), Export Diversifi cation and Economic Growth, World Bank Working Paper, 21, 1-23.
  • JOHANSEN, S. (1991), Estimation And Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models, Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580.
  • JOHANSEN, S. (1995), Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford University Press.
  • JOHANSEN, S. ve JUSELIUS, K. (1990), Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inferences on Cointegration with Applications to The Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.
  • KAYA, A. A. (2004). İçsel Büyüme Kuramları, E. KUTLU içinde, İktisadi Kalkınma ve Büyüme (s. 291-307), Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  • KILAVUZ, E. ve TOPÇU, B. A. (2012). Export and Economic Growth in the Case of the Manufacturing Industry: Panel Data Analysis of Developing Countries, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(2), 201-215.
  • KWIATKOWSKI, D., PHILLIPS, P.C.B., SCHMIDT, P. and SHIN, Y. (1992), Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root, Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178.
  • ÖZER, M. ve ÇİFTÇİ, N. (2008), Ar-Ge Tabanlı İçsel Büyüme Modelleri ve Ar-Ge Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Panel Veri Analizi, SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 219-240.
  • PERRON, P. (1989), The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis, Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401.
  • PHILIPS, P. C. B. ve PERRON, P. (1988), Testing for Unit Roots in Time Series Regression, Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
  • ROMER, P. M. (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
  • ROMER, P. M. (1990), Endogenous Technological Change, The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
  • SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • STOCK, J. H. and WATSON, M. W. (1993), A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems, Econometrica, 61(4), 783-820.
  • ŞİMŞEK, M. ve KADILAR, C. (2010), Türkiye’de Beşeri Sermaye, İhracat ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin Nedensellik Analizi, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 115-140.
  • TELATAR, O. M., DEĞER, M. K. ve DOĞANAY, M. A. (2016), Teknoloji Yoğunluklu Ürün İhracatının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği (1996:Q1-2015:Q3), Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 30(4), 921-934.
  • USTABAŞ, A. and ERSİN, Ö. Ö. (2016), The Effects of R&D and High Technology Exports on Economic Growth: A Comparative Cointegration Analysis for Turkey and South Korea, International Conference On Eurasian Economies 2016, 44-55.
  • WORZ, J. (2005), Skill Intensity in Foreign Trade and Economic Growth, Empirica, 32, 117–144.
  • YARDMCI, P. (2006), İçsel Büyüme Modelleri ve Türkiye Ekonomisinde İçsel Büyümenin Dinamikleri, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İİBF Dergisi, 10(9), 96-115.
  • YOUNG, A. (1991), Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 369–405.
  • ZIVOT, E. and ANDREWS, D. (1992), Further Evidence On The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGH TECHNOLOGY EXPORTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: CASE of TURKEY

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 865 - 884, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.526828

Abstract

Given
the growing international trade volume in the globalizing world economy, it is
foreseen that technological development will have considerable influence in the
international trade and economic growth of countries. In this respect, it is
important to study the impact of technological developments of countries on the
export of technological products and the extent to which the export of
technological products will contribute to the economic growth of the countries.
This study will first tried to put forward the impact on trade of technological
products of technological developments emerged in Turkey. Furthermore, the main
objective of the study is that technological products trade to economic growth
of Turkey is identified which sectors that contribute more. Thus, high
technology sectors that contribute most to economic growth in Turkey will be
determined andin order to raise the welfare level of Turkey more quickly in the
detected sectors specializing aims to increase the technological products
trade. According to results of analyzes, specialization of exports of chemical
industry, electrical machinery and apparatus industry, armament industry,
electronics and communications industry and scientific instruments industry as high-tech
sectors have been determined that further increased the level of economic
growth in Turkey.

References

  • AGHION, P. and HOWITT, P. (1992), A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351.
  • ALPER, A. E. (2017), Türkiye’de Patent, Ar-Ge Harcamaları, İhracat ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Bayer-Hanck Eş Bütünleşme Analizi, 3. Uluslararası Politik, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Kongresi, 17-26.
  • ARROW, K. J. (1962), The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.
  • BBAALE, E. and MUTENYO, J. (2011), Export Composition and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa A Panel Analysis, Consilience, (6), 1-19.
  • DEĞER, M. K. (2010), İhracatta Ürün Çeşitliliği Ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Türkiye Deneyimi (1980-2006), Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 259-287.
  • DICKEY, D. A. and FULLER, W. A. (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.
  • ELLIOT, G., ROTHENBERG, T. J. and STOCK, J. H. (1996), Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root, Econometrica, 64, 813-836.
  • ENDERS, W. (2003), Applied Econometric Time-Series, 2nd Edition, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • ENGLE, R. F. and GRANGER, C. W. J. (1987), Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Es¬timation and Testing, Econometrica, 55(1), 251- 276.
  • GROSSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1989), Comparative Advantage and Long-Run Growth, The American Economic Review, 80(4), 796-815.
  • GROSSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • HATZICHRONOGLOU, T. (1997), Revision of The High-Technology Sector And Product Classification, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • HERZER, D. and NOWAK-LEHNMANN, F. D. (2006), What does export diversification do for growth? An econometric analysis, Applied Economics, 38, 1825–1838.
  • HESSE, H. (2008), Export Diversifi cation and Economic Growth, World Bank Working Paper, 21, 1-23.
  • JOHANSEN, S. (1991), Estimation And Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models, Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580.
  • JOHANSEN, S. (1995), Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford University Press.
  • JOHANSEN, S. ve JUSELIUS, K. (1990), Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inferences on Cointegration with Applications to The Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.
  • KAYA, A. A. (2004). İçsel Büyüme Kuramları, E. KUTLU içinde, İktisadi Kalkınma ve Büyüme (s. 291-307), Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  • KILAVUZ, E. ve TOPÇU, B. A. (2012). Export and Economic Growth in the Case of the Manufacturing Industry: Panel Data Analysis of Developing Countries, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(2), 201-215.
  • KWIATKOWSKI, D., PHILLIPS, P.C.B., SCHMIDT, P. and SHIN, Y. (1992), Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root, Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178.
  • ÖZER, M. ve ÇİFTÇİ, N. (2008), Ar-Ge Tabanlı İçsel Büyüme Modelleri ve Ar-Ge Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Panel Veri Analizi, SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 219-240.
  • PERRON, P. (1989), The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis, Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401.
  • PHILIPS, P. C. B. ve PERRON, P. (1988), Testing for Unit Roots in Time Series Regression, Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
  • ROMER, P. M. (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
  • ROMER, P. M. (1990), Endogenous Technological Change, The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
  • SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • STOCK, J. H. and WATSON, M. W. (1993), A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems, Econometrica, 61(4), 783-820.
  • ŞİMŞEK, M. ve KADILAR, C. (2010), Türkiye’de Beşeri Sermaye, İhracat ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin Nedensellik Analizi, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 115-140.
  • TELATAR, O. M., DEĞER, M. K. ve DOĞANAY, M. A. (2016), Teknoloji Yoğunluklu Ürün İhracatının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği (1996:Q1-2015:Q3), Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 30(4), 921-934.
  • USTABAŞ, A. and ERSİN, Ö. Ö. (2016), The Effects of R&D and High Technology Exports on Economic Growth: A Comparative Cointegration Analysis for Turkey and South Korea, International Conference On Eurasian Economies 2016, 44-55.
  • WORZ, J. (2005), Skill Intensity in Foreign Trade and Economic Growth, Empirica, 32, 117–144.
  • YARDMCI, P. (2006), İçsel Büyüme Modelleri ve Türkiye Ekonomisinde İçsel Büyümenin Dinamikleri, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İİBF Dergisi, 10(9), 96-115.
  • YOUNG, A. (1991), Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 369–405.
  • ZIVOT, E. and ANDREWS, D. (1992), Further Evidence On The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Ayberk Şeker 0000-0001-7750-6286

Selami Özcan 0000-0002-0882-427X

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Submission Date February 13, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Şeker, A., & Özcan, S. (2019). YÜKSEK TEKNOLOJİLİ ÜRÜN İHRACATI VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(3), 865-884. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.526828