Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Importance of Resource-based View Related Abilities and Financial Performance of SMEs for Their Sustainable Practices

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 1542 - 1558, 31.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1510554

Abstract

Financial performance has always been a major concern of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) for their survival and sustainability practices. However, SMEs’ innovation and technological capabilities included in Resource-Based View (RBV), might stimulate their financial outcomes. Hence, this research aims to investigate the effects of innovation and technological capabilities on the financial performance of SMEs. The researcher applies a stratified random sampling method to create the research sample. Then 479 firm executives have fulfilled this survey. Furthermore, the researcher has performed Ordinal Logistic Regression tests for analysis purposes. The results confirm the negative impact of technological (patent-trademark ownership) and innovation capabilities (R&D alliances, investments and subsidies) on financial performance. R&D financing options of policy-makers, innovation and technology-related educational, and training activities of governments, universities, and certification institutions, and firms’ selection of innovative partners can stimulate firms’ innovative, technological, and financial performance and make them become more sustainable.

Ethical Statement

Research data was collected in 2019. Thus, this paper does not need the approval of Ethics Committee. The study has been crafted in adherence to the principles of research and publication ethics. The author declares that there exists no financial conflict of interest involving any institution, organization, or individual(s) associated with the article. The entire work was carried out by its only, stated author.

References

  • Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014). Linking operations performance to knowledge management capability: The mediating role of innovation performance, Production Planning & Control, 25(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2012.655802
  • Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
  • Aristei, D., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2016). University and inter-firm R&D collaborations: Propensity and intensity of cooperation in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 841-871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9403-1
  • Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.x
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  • Belas, J., Rahman, A., Rahman, M. T., & Schonfeld, J. (2017). Financial constraints on innovative SMEs: Empirical evidence from the Visegrad countries. Engineering Economics, 28(5), 552-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.28.5.18204
  • Block, J., Hansen, C., & Steinmetz, H. (2023). Are family firms doing more innovation output with less innovation input? A replication and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1496-1520. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221084249
  • Brown, R., Liñares-Zegarra, J. M., & Wilson, J. O. (2022). Innovation and borrower discouragement in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 59(4), 1489-1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00587-1
  • Caldas, L. F. D. P., Paula, F. D. O., & Macedo-Soares, T. D. L. V. A. D. (2019). Industry innovation spending and openness to collaboration as levers for firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(4), 617-638. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2018-0075
  • Chen, Q., Wang, C. H., & Huang, S. Z. (2021). Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta. In Inside the Changing Business of China (pp. 72-96). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1592339
  • Chung, H. (2022). Understanding firm-level intangible investment: A resource-based view on Korean firms. Applied Economics Letters, 29(19), 1757-1764. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1962502
  • Clancy, M. S., & Moschini, G. (2013). Incentives for innovation: Patents, prizes, and research contracts. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35(2), 206-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppt012
  • Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
  • Cucculelli, M., & Peruzzi, V. (2020). Post-crisis firm survival, business model changes, and learning: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 54(2), 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0044-2
  • Dai, X., Guo, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Composition of R&D expenditures and firm performance. Technology analysis & strategic management, 32(6), 739-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1705967
  • Di Novo, S., Fazio, G., Sapsed, J., & Siepel, J. (2022). Starving the golden goose? Access to finance for innovators in the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 46(2), 345-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-022-09448-5
  • Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of management Journal, 59(4), 1224-1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
  • Dzomonda, O. (2022). Environmental sustainability commitment and access to finance by small and medium enterprises: The role of financial performance and corporate governance. Sustainability, 14(14), 63- 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148863
  • Egger, P., & Keuschnigg, C. (2015). Innovation, trade, and finance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7(2), 121-157. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20120032
  • Entezarkheir, M. (2019). Patent ownership fragmentation and market value: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500129
  • Faurel, L., Li, Q., Shanthikumar, D., & Teoh, S. H. (2024). Bringing innovation to fruition: Insights from new trademarks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59(2), 474-520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109022001260
  • Gil-Soto, E., García-Rodríguez, F. J., Ruiz-Rosa, I., & Gutiérrez-Taño, D. (2022). Economic context and entrepreneurial intention: Analysis of individuals’ perceptions in a Spanish university context. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 14(2) 707-734. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2021-0290
  • Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2022). Government R&D support and firms’ access to external financing: funding effects, certification effects, or both? Technovation, 115, 102469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102469
  • Harrell, F. E. (2015). Regression modeling strategies. Springer series in statistics. Springer.
  • Hoffmann, A. O., & Kleimeier, S. (2021). How do banks finance R&D intensive firms? The role of patents in overcoming information asymmetry. Finance Research Letters, 38(2021), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101485
  • Howard, M., Steensma, H. K., Lyles, M., & Dhanaraj, C. (2016). Learning to collaborate through collaboration: How allying with expert firms influences collaborative innovation within novice firms. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2092-2103. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2424
  • Hsu, P. H., Li, D., Li, Q., Teoh, S. H., & Tseng, K. (2022). Valuation of new trademarks. Management Science, 68(1), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3887
  • Jin, S., & Lee, K. (2020). The government R&D funding and management performance: The mediating effect of technology innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040094
  • Kölbel, J. F., Busch, T., & Jancso, L. M. (2017). How media coverage of corporate social irresponsibility increases financial risk. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2266-2284. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2647
  • Le, C., Nguyen, B., & Vo, V. (2024). Do intangible assets help SMEs in underdeveloped markets gain access to external finance? The case of Vietnam. Small Business Economics, 62(2), 833-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00785-z
  • Le, T. T., & Ikram, M. (2022). Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from The SME Sector in Vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 588– 599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.008
  • Lee, N., & Brown, R. (2017). Innovation, SMEs and the liability of distance: the demand and supply of bank funding in UK peripheral regions. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(1), 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw011
  • Lee, C. L., & Wu, H. C. (2016). How do slack resources affect the relationship between R&D expenditures and firm performance? Impacts of slack resources on R&D and firm performance. R&D Management, 46, 958– 978. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12141
  • Leung, T. Y., & Sharma, P. (2021). Differences in the impact of R&D intensity and R&D internationalization on firm performance–Mediating role of innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 131, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.060
  • Li, L., Chen, J., Gao, H., & Xie, L. (2019). The certification effect of government R&D subsidies on innovative entrepreneurial firms' access to bank finance: Evidence from China. Small Business Economics, 52(1), 241- 259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0024-6 Lv, D. D., Zeng, P., & Lan, H. (2018). Co-patent, financing constraints, and innovation in SMEs: An empirical analysis using market value panel data of listed firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.02.001
  • Markus, G., & Rideg, A. (2020). Understanding the connection between SMEs’ competitiveness and cash flow generation: An empirical analysis from Hungary. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2020-0019
  • Garcia Martinez, M., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Sánchez García, M. (2014). Open innovation strategies in the food and drink industry: Determinants and impact on innovation performance. International Journal of Technology Management 23, 66(2-3), 212-242. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2014.064588
  • Martinez-Noya, A., & Narula, R. (2018). What more can we learn from R&D alliances? A review and research agenda. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(3), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.04.001
  • Meuleman, M., & Maeseneire, W. D., (2012). Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs' access to external financing? Res. Policy, 41, 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.001
  • Mochkabadi, K., Kleinert, S., Urbig, D., & Volkmann, C. (2024). From distinctiveness to optimal distinctiveness: External endorsements, innovativeness and new venture funding. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(2024), 1- 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106340
  • Mushtaq, R., Gull, A. A., & Usman, M. (2022). ICT adoption, innovation, and SMEs’ access to finance. Telecommunications Policy, 46(2022), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102275
  • Nason, R. S., & Wiklund, J. (2018). An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. Journal of management, 44(1), 32-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315610635
  • Nikitenko, S. M., Mesyats, M. A., & Rozhkova, O. V. (2017). Intellectual property as an instrument of interaction between government, business, science and society. Earth and Environmental Science, 84(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/84/1/012015
  • Niño-Amézquita, J., Legotin, F., & Barbakov, O. (2017). Economic success and sustainability in pharmaceutical sector: A case of Indian SMEs. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1
  • Oh, I., & Hwang, S. (2024). Assessing the effect of the size of R&D subsidies on the economic performance of SMEs: Comparison of manufacturing and service firms in Korea. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2024(15), 518-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01089-5
  • Pang, C., & Gai, Y. (2022). Research on efficiency in financing of small and medium companies based on dea method. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4914151
  • Peng, M. (2009). Global Business. Cengage Learning.
  • Pereira, M., & Suárez, D. (2018). Matthew effect, capabilities and innovation policy: The Argentinean case. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1294544
  • Plank, J., & Doblinger, C. (2018). The firm-level innovation impact of public R&D funding: Evidence from the German renewable energy sector. Energy policy, 113(2018), 430-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.031
  • Rahko, J. (2016). Internationalization of corporate R&D activities and innovation performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(6), 1019–1038 https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw012
  • Singh, R. K., Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., & Uniyal, S. (2019). Applications of information and communication technology for sustainable growth of SMEs in India food industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 147(2019), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.014
  • Sircar, S., Turnbow, J. L., & Bordoloi, B. (2000). A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of management information systems, 16(4), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11518266
  • Son, S. C., & Zo, H. (2023). Do R&D resources affect open innovation strategies in SMEs: The mediating effect of R&D openness on the relationship between R&D resources and firm performance in South Korea’s innovation clusters. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(11), 1385-1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.2007237
  • Sohn, D., Hur, W., & Kim, H. J. (2010). Effects of R&D and patents on the financial performance of Korean venture firms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 18(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2010.9668697
  • Soriano, D. R., & Huarng, K. H. (2013). Innovation and entrepreneurship in knowledge industries. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1964-1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.019
  • Takalo, T., & Tanayama, T. (2010). Adverse selection and financing of innovation: is there a need for R&D subsidies? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 16-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9112-8
  • Ughetto, E. (2008). Does internal finance matter for R&D? New evidence from a panel of Italian firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(6), 907-925. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben015
  • Usman, M. (2016). Bank performance, risk and economic growth: Role of financial innovation. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 7(3), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2016v7i3p3-22 Wasiuzzaman, S., Nurdin, N., Abdullah, A. H., & Vinayan, G. (2020). Creditworthiness and access to finance of SMEs in Malaysia: do linkages with large firms matter? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2019-0075
  • World Bank, (2023a). SME statistics. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/smefinance
  • World Bank, (2023b). Research and Development Expenditures in % of GDP. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
  • Yankson, I. O., Kwaning, E. A., & Dogbe, C. S. K. (2022). Assessing the moderating role of risk management capabilities in the relationship between service innovation and financial performance of insurance firms. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6853435
  • Yuan, X., & Hou, F. (2023). How do patent thickets affect financial performance: a three-way interaction model. European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0122
  • Zhang, Z., Zhu, H., Zhou, Z., & Zou, K. (2022). How does innovation matter for sustainable performance? Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 153(2022), 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.034
  • Zhu, H. M., Zhang, Z. Q. Y., Huang, Y., & Mao, W. F. (2021). Quantile heterogeneous impact of R&D on firm growth in Chinese manufacture: How ownership, firm size and sectors matter? Applied Economics, 53(28), 3267– 3287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1873235

The Importance of Resource-based View Related Abilities and Financial Performance of SMEs for Their Sustainable Practices

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 1542 - 1558, 31.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1510554

Abstract

Financial performance has always been a major concern of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) for their survival and sustainability practices. However, SMEs’ innovation and technological capabilities included in Resource-Based View (RBV), might stimulate their financial outcomes. Hence, this research aims to investigate the effects of innovation and technological capabilities on the financial performance of SMEs. The researcher applies a stratified random sampling method to create the research sample. Then 479 firm executives have fulfilled this survey. Furthermore, the researcher has performed Ordinal Logistic Regression tests for analysis purposes. The results confirm the negative impact of technological (patent-trademark ownership) and innovation capabilities (R&D alliances, investments and subsidies) on financial performance. R&D financing options of policy-makers, innovation and technology-related educational, and training activities of governments, universities, and certification institutions, and firms’ selection of innovative partners can stimulate firms’ innovative, technological, and financial performance and make them become more sustainable.

References

  • Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014). Linking operations performance to knowledge management capability: The mediating role of innovation performance, Production Planning & Control, 25(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2012.655802
  • Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
  • Aristei, D., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2016). University and inter-firm R&D collaborations: Propensity and intensity of cooperation in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 841-871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9403-1
  • Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.x
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  • Belas, J., Rahman, A., Rahman, M. T., & Schonfeld, J. (2017). Financial constraints on innovative SMEs: Empirical evidence from the Visegrad countries. Engineering Economics, 28(5), 552-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.28.5.18204
  • Block, J., Hansen, C., & Steinmetz, H. (2023). Are family firms doing more innovation output with less innovation input? A replication and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1496-1520. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221084249
  • Brown, R., Liñares-Zegarra, J. M., & Wilson, J. O. (2022). Innovation and borrower discouragement in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 59(4), 1489-1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00587-1
  • Caldas, L. F. D. P., Paula, F. D. O., & Macedo-Soares, T. D. L. V. A. D. (2019). Industry innovation spending and openness to collaboration as levers for firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(4), 617-638. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2018-0075
  • Chen, Q., Wang, C. H., & Huang, S. Z. (2021). Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta. In Inside the Changing Business of China (pp. 72-96). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1592339
  • Chung, H. (2022). Understanding firm-level intangible investment: A resource-based view on Korean firms. Applied Economics Letters, 29(19), 1757-1764. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1962502
  • Clancy, M. S., & Moschini, G. (2013). Incentives for innovation: Patents, prizes, and research contracts. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35(2), 206-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppt012
  • Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
  • Cucculelli, M., & Peruzzi, V. (2020). Post-crisis firm survival, business model changes, and learning: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 54(2), 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0044-2
  • Dai, X., Guo, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Composition of R&D expenditures and firm performance. Technology analysis & strategic management, 32(6), 739-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1705967
  • Di Novo, S., Fazio, G., Sapsed, J., & Siepel, J. (2022). Starving the golden goose? Access to finance for innovators in the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 46(2), 345-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-022-09448-5
  • Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of management Journal, 59(4), 1224-1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
  • Dzomonda, O. (2022). Environmental sustainability commitment and access to finance by small and medium enterprises: The role of financial performance and corporate governance. Sustainability, 14(14), 63- 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148863
  • Egger, P., & Keuschnigg, C. (2015). Innovation, trade, and finance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7(2), 121-157. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20120032
  • Entezarkheir, M. (2019). Patent ownership fragmentation and market value: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500129
  • Faurel, L., Li, Q., Shanthikumar, D., & Teoh, S. H. (2024). Bringing innovation to fruition: Insights from new trademarks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59(2), 474-520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109022001260
  • Gil-Soto, E., García-Rodríguez, F. J., Ruiz-Rosa, I., & Gutiérrez-Taño, D. (2022). Economic context and entrepreneurial intention: Analysis of individuals’ perceptions in a Spanish university context. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 14(2) 707-734. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2021-0290
  • Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2022). Government R&D support and firms’ access to external financing: funding effects, certification effects, or both? Technovation, 115, 102469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102469
  • Harrell, F. E. (2015). Regression modeling strategies. Springer series in statistics. Springer.
  • Hoffmann, A. O., & Kleimeier, S. (2021). How do banks finance R&D intensive firms? The role of patents in overcoming information asymmetry. Finance Research Letters, 38(2021), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101485
  • Howard, M., Steensma, H. K., Lyles, M., & Dhanaraj, C. (2016). Learning to collaborate through collaboration: How allying with expert firms influences collaborative innovation within novice firms. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2092-2103. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2424
  • Hsu, P. H., Li, D., Li, Q., Teoh, S. H., & Tseng, K. (2022). Valuation of new trademarks. Management Science, 68(1), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3887
  • Jin, S., & Lee, K. (2020). The government R&D funding and management performance: The mediating effect of technology innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040094
  • Kölbel, J. F., Busch, T., & Jancso, L. M. (2017). How media coverage of corporate social irresponsibility increases financial risk. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2266-2284. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2647
  • Le, C., Nguyen, B., & Vo, V. (2024). Do intangible assets help SMEs in underdeveloped markets gain access to external finance? The case of Vietnam. Small Business Economics, 62(2), 833-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00785-z
  • Le, T. T., & Ikram, M. (2022). Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from The SME Sector in Vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 588– 599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.008
  • Lee, N., & Brown, R. (2017). Innovation, SMEs and the liability of distance: the demand and supply of bank funding in UK peripheral regions. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(1), 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw011
  • Lee, C. L., & Wu, H. C. (2016). How do slack resources affect the relationship between R&D expenditures and firm performance? Impacts of slack resources on R&D and firm performance. R&D Management, 46, 958– 978. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12141
  • Leung, T. Y., & Sharma, P. (2021). Differences in the impact of R&D intensity and R&D internationalization on firm performance–Mediating role of innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 131, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.060
  • Li, L., Chen, J., Gao, H., & Xie, L. (2019). The certification effect of government R&D subsidies on innovative entrepreneurial firms' access to bank finance: Evidence from China. Small Business Economics, 52(1), 241- 259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0024-6 Lv, D. D., Zeng, P., & Lan, H. (2018). Co-patent, financing constraints, and innovation in SMEs: An empirical analysis using market value panel data of listed firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.02.001
  • Markus, G., & Rideg, A. (2020). Understanding the connection between SMEs’ competitiveness and cash flow generation: An empirical analysis from Hungary. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2020-0019
  • Garcia Martinez, M., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Sánchez García, M. (2014). Open innovation strategies in the food and drink industry: Determinants and impact on innovation performance. International Journal of Technology Management 23, 66(2-3), 212-242. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2014.064588
  • Martinez-Noya, A., & Narula, R. (2018). What more can we learn from R&D alliances? A review and research agenda. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(3), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.04.001
  • Meuleman, M., & Maeseneire, W. D., (2012). Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs' access to external financing? Res. Policy, 41, 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.001
  • Mochkabadi, K., Kleinert, S., Urbig, D., & Volkmann, C. (2024). From distinctiveness to optimal distinctiveness: External endorsements, innovativeness and new venture funding. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(2024), 1- 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106340
  • Mushtaq, R., Gull, A. A., & Usman, M. (2022). ICT adoption, innovation, and SMEs’ access to finance. Telecommunications Policy, 46(2022), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102275
  • Nason, R. S., & Wiklund, J. (2018). An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. Journal of management, 44(1), 32-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315610635
  • Nikitenko, S. M., Mesyats, M. A., & Rozhkova, O. V. (2017). Intellectual property as an instrument of interaction between government, business, science and society. Earth and Environmental Science, 84(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/84/1/012015
  • Niño-Amézquita, J., Legotin, F., & Barbakov, O. (2017). Economic success and sustainability in pharmaceutical sector: A case of Indian SMEs. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1
  • Oh, I., & Hwang, S. (2024). Assessing the effect of the size of R&D subsidies on the economic performance of SMEs: Comparison of manufacturing and service firms in Korea. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2024(15), 518-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01089-5
  • Pang, C., & Gai, Y. (2022). Research on efficiency in financing of small and medium companies based on dea method. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4914151
  • Peng, M. (2009). Global Business. Cengage Learning.
  • Pereira, M., & Suárez, D. (2018). Matthew effect, capabilities and innovation policy: The Argentinean case. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1294544
  • Plank, J., & Doblinger, C. (2018). The firm-level innovation impact of public R&D funding: Evidence from the German renewable energy sector. Energy policy, 113(2018), 430-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.031
  • Rahko, J. (2016). Internationalization of corporate R&D activities and innovation performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(6), 1019–1038 https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw012
  • Singh, R. K., Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., & Uniyal, S. (2019). Applications of information and communication technology for sustainable growth of SMEs in India food industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 147(2019), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.014
  • Sircar, S., Turnbow, J. L., & Bordoloi, B. (2000). A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of management information systems, 16(4), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11518266
  • Son, S. C., & Zo, H. (2023). Do R&D resources affect open innovation strategies in SMEs: The mediating effect of R&D openness on the relationship between R&D resources and firm performance in South Korea’s innovation clusters. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(11), 1385-1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.2007237
  • Sohn, D., Hur, W., & Kim, H. J. (2010). Effects of R&D and patents on the financial performance of Korean venture firms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 18(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2010.9668697
  • Soriano, D. R., & Huarng, K. H. (2013). Innovation and entrepreneurship in knowledge industries. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1964-1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.019
  • Takalo, T., & Tanayama, T. (2010). Adverse selection and financing of innovation: is there a need for R&D subsidies? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 16-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9112-8
  • Ughetto, E. (2008). Does internal finance matter for R&D? New evidence from a panel of Italian firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(6), 907-925. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben015
  • Usman, M. (2016). Bank performance, risk and economic growth: Role of financial innovation. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 7(3), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2016v7i3p3-22 Wasiuzzaman, S., Nurdin, N., Abdullah, A. H., & Vinayan, G. (2020). Creditworthiness and access to finance of SMEs in Malaysia: do linkages with large firms matter? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2019-0075
  • World Bank, (2023a). SME statistics. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/smefinance
  • World Bank, (2023b). Research and Development Expenditures in % of GDP. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
  • Yankson, I. O., Kwaning, E. A., & Dogbe, C. S. K. (2022). Assessing the moderating role of risk management capabilities in the relationship between service innovation and financial performance of insurance firms. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6853435
  • Yuan, X., & Hou, F. (2023). How do patent thickets affect financial performance: a three-way interaction model. European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0122
  • Zhang, Z., Zhu, H., Zhou, Z., & Zou, K. (2022). How does innovation matter for sustainable performance? Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 153(2022), 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.034
  • Zhu, H. M., Zhang, Z. Q. Y., Huang, Y., & Mao, W. F. (2021). Quantile heterogeneous impact of R&D on firm growth in Chinese manufacture: How ownership, firm size and sectors matter? Applied Economics, 53(28), 3267– 3287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1873235
There are 64 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Mehmet Civelek 0000-0002-1247-5308

Publication Date December 31, 2024
Submission Date July 4, 2024
Acceptance Date December 5, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 11 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Civelek, M. (2024). The Importance of Resource-based View Related Abilities and Financial Performance of SMEs for Their Sustainable Practices. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 11(4), 1542-1558. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1510554

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author(s) bear full responsibility for the ideas and arguments presented in their articles. All scientific and legal accountability concerning the language, style, adherence to scientific ethics, and content of the published work rests solely with the author(s). Neither the journal nor the institution(s) affiliated with the author(s) assume any liability in this regard.