ARE HUMAN BEINGS INHERENTLY AGGRESSIVE? UNDERSTANDING HUMAN AGGRESSION WITH VARIOUS THEORIES

Abstract

This study conducts a discussion around the question of whether human aggression is innate or shaped by environmental factors. The aim of the study is to examine the causes of aggression in terms of biological (evolutionary) and socio-psychological dimensions and to reveal the multidimensional nature of aggression in line with the explanations provided by these two disciplines. The literature review method was based on the theories of important theorists such as Konrad Lorenz, Richard Dawkins, and Albert Bandura. The results show that aggression is not dependent on a single cause, and that biological tendencies emerge in interaction with social and environmental factors. The most important contribution of this study will be to present a more holistic perspective on the causes of violence, conflict, and war on both individual and societal levels of human aggression in this article that takes an interdisciplinary approach.

Keywords

• Human Aggression
• Socio-Psychological Perspectives
• Biological Stance
• The Selfish Gene
• Social Learning Theory
• Frustration-Agression Theory
• Deindividuation Theory

İNSANLAR DOĞUŞTAN SALDIRGAN MIDIR? İNSAN SALDIRGANLIĞINI ÇEŞİTLİ TEORİLERLE ANLAMAK

Abstract

Bu çalışma, insan saldırganlığının doğuştan mı yoksa çevresel faktörlerle mi şekillendiği sorusu etrafında bir tartışma yürütmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, saldırganlığın nedenlerini biyolojik (evrimsel) ve sosyo-psikolojik boyutuyla inceleyerek, bu iki disiplinin sunduğu açıklamalar doğrultusunda saldırganlığın çok boyutlu doğasını ortaya koymaktır. Literatür taraması yöntemiyle Konrad Lorenz, Richard Dawkins, Albert Bandura gibi önemli teorisyenlerin saldırganlıkla ilgili teorileri temel alınmıştır. Sonuçlar, saldırganlığın tek bir nedene bağlı olmadığı, biyolojik eğilimlerin sosyal ve çevresel faktörlerle etkileşim içinde gün yüzüne çıktığını göstermektedir. Disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşım ele alan makalede insan saldırganlığını hem bireysel hem de toplumsal düzeyde şiddet, çatışma ve savaşın nedenlerine dair daha bütüncül bir bakış acısı sunmak bu çalışmanın en önemli katkısı olacaktır.

Keywords

• : İnsan Saldırganlığı
• Sosyo-Psikolojik Perspektifler
• Biyolojik Duruş
• Bencil Gen
• Sosyal Öğrenme Teorisi
• Engellenme-Agresyon Teorisi
• Deindividuation Teorisi

References

1. Amnesty International. (2024). Armed conflict. https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/armed-conflict/
2. Anderson, C. A. ve Huesmann, L. R. (2003). Human aggression: A social-cognitive view. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 296–323). Sage Publications.
3. Baron, R. (1977). Human aggression. Plenum Press.
4. Başar, F. ve Demirci, N. (2016). Toplumsal Cinsiyet Esitsizligi ve Şiddet. Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi, 2(1), 41-52.
5. Baumeister, R. F. ve Bushman, B. J. (2011). Social psychology and human nature. Wadsworth.
6. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. General Learning Press.
7. Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59
8. Bull, H. (1981). Hobbes and the international anarchy. Social Research, 48(4), 717–738. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970843

9. Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
10. Demirtaş-Madran, H. A. (2020). Cinsiyet ve saldırganlık ilişkisi: Görgül ve kuramsal çalışmalara güncel bir bakış. Turk Psikoloji Yazilari, 23(45), 97-114.
11. Diener, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self- awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 209–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H. ve Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press.
13. Eraslan, L. ve Kukuoglu, A. (2019). Social relations in the virtual world and social media aggression. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v11i2
14. Feldman, R. S. (1998). Social psychology (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
15. Fox, S. ve Spector, P. E. (2009). A model of work frustration- aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (6), 915– 931. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099- 1379(199911)20:6<915::AID-JOB918>3.0.CO;2-6
16. Gat, A. (2006). War in human civilization. Oxford University Press.
17. Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. (2024). Today’s armed conflicts. http://geneva-academy.ch
18. Geen, R. G. (1990). Human aggression. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
19. Glasgow University. (2015). Aggression: Problems with definitions. http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~paddy/level_2/L7_aggrobio.pdf
20. Haddad, C., Malaeb, D., Sacre, H., Bou Khalil, J., Khansa, W., Al Hajj, R., Kheir, N., Saade, S., Obeid, S. ve Hallit, S. (2021). Association of problematic internet use with depression, impulsivity, anger, aggression, and social anxiety: Results of a national study among Lebanese adolescents. Pediatric investigation, 5(4), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12299
21. Heinze, J. (2013). Aggression in humans and other animals – A biological prelude. In H.-H. Kortüm & J. Heinze (Eds.), Aggression in humans and other primates (pp. 3–18). Deutsche Nationalbibliothek.
22. Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
23. Huesmann, L. R., Dubow, E. F., Boxer, P., Landau, S. F., Gvirsman, S. D. ve Shikaki, K. (2017). Children's exposure to violent political conflict stimulates aggression at peers by increasing emotional distress, aggressive script rehearsal, and normative beliefs favoring aggression. Development and psychopathology, 29(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416001115
24. Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting "patriarchy" as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246
25. Keles, B., McCrae, N. ve Grealish, A. (2020). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851
26. Lorenz, K. (2002). On aggression. Routledge.
27. Liu, J., Lewis, G. ve Evans, L. (2013). Understanding aggressive behaviour across the lifespan. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 20 (2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01902.x
28. Mann, L., Newton, J. W. ve Innes, J. M. (1982). A test between deindividuation and emergent norm theories of crowd aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0 3514.42.2.260
29. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. (2014). Biological and social causes of aggression. http://homepages.rpi.edu/~verwyc/oh10.html
30. Reicher, S., Spears, R. ve Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6 (1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
31. Sampasa-Kanyinga, H. ve Lewis, R. F. (2015). Frequent use of social networking sites is associated with poor psychological functioning among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 380– 385. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0055
32. Sapolsky, R. M. (2006). A natural history of peace. Foreign Affairs, 85 (1), 104– 120. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/natural-history-peace
33. Shalit, B. (1988). The psychology of conflict and combat. Praeger.
34. Shahid, M. S. ., Yousaf, R. . ve Munir, H. (2024). Social media addiction, depression and aggression in young adults. Journal of Professional & Applied Psychology, 5(2), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v5i2.297
35. Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A. ve Sears, O. D. (2000). Social psychology (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
36. Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L. ve Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617723376
37. Thomas, D. G. (1989). Social withdrawal and aggression in children: Behavioral alternatives to frustration. In K. H. Rubin & D. Pepler (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 219–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Nauts, S., Langner, O., Huijsmans, I., Vonk, R. ve Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2000). Person perception: Forming impressions of others. In S. E. Taylor, L. A. Peplau ve D. O. Sears (Eds.), Social psychology (pp. 62–97). Wadsworth. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000179
39. Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
40. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Harvard University Press.
41. Zillmann, D. (1979). Hostility and aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.