BibTex RIS Cite

Bilgi Yönetimi Sürecinde Performans Yönetim Modellerinin Uygulanması

Year 2010, Issue: 2, 59 - 76, 29.06.2010

Abstract

Organizasyonlar süreçlerini, teknolojilerini ve insan kaynaklarının yönetimini daha mükemmel bir duruma getirmek amacıyla performans yönetim modellerini uygulamaktadır. Performans yönetim modelleri, son dönemde performans ölçümü konusunda yapılan çalışmalarla sürekli gelişen bir alan olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Toplam (Dengeli) Başarı Göstergesi Modeli (Balanced scorecard) (BSC), EFQM Mükemmellik Modeli (The European Foundation for Quality Management Excellence Model) ve diğer mükemmellik modelleri, işletme ve akademinin tarama alanına objektif bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. İşletmelerin bilgi yönetimi uygulamaları ile performans yönetim modellerinin ilişkilendirilmesine dönük araştırmaların yeterli düzeyde olmadığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada literatür desteğiyle, bilgi yönetimi ve performans yönetim modellerinin entegre edilmesine odaklanılarak, uygulama konusunda özgün bir yol haritasının geliştirilmesi olasılığına cevap aranacaktır.

References

  • excellence model and knowledge management ımplications.
  • http://www.eknowledgecenter.com/articles (20.01.2009).
  • Du Plessis, M. ve Boon, J.A. (2004). The role of knowledge management in ebusiness and customer relationship management: South African case study findings. International Journal of Information Management, 24 (1), 73-86.
  • Dumond, E.J. (1994). Making Best use of performance measures and information. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(9), 16-31.
  • Eskildsen, J.K. & Dahlgaard, J.J. (2000). A causal model for employee satisfaction. The TQM Magazine, 11 (8), 1081-1094.
  • EFQM: The EFQM excellence model, 1999.
  • Ghobadian, Abby (1994). Characteristics, benefits and shortcomings of four major quality awards. The International Journal Of Quality And Reliability Management, 13 (2), 10-44
  • Gloet, M. Ve Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15 (5), 402-9.
  • Greiner, Martina E., Bohmann, Tilo & Krcmar & Helmut A. (2007). Strategy for knowledge management. Journal Of Knowledge Management, 11 (6), 2007, 3-15.
  • Jinette de Gooijer (2000). Designing a knowledge management performance framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4 (4), 303-310.
  • Kaplan, R. S. Ve Norton, D. P. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), Sep.-Oct., 134-142.
  • Kaplan, Robert S. & Norton, David P. (1996). The balanced scorecard – translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1996. Xi, 322.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balance scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 52–63.
  • Kerschberg, L. (2001). Knowledge management in heterogeneous data warehouse environments, proceedings of the third international conference on data warehousing and knowledge discovery. Lecture Notes In Computer Science , Vol. 2114, Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
  • Knapp, Ellen (1998). Knowledge management. Business & Economic Review, 44 (4), July – September 1998.
  • Kristensen, Kai et. al. (1998). Fundamentals of total quality management. Chapman & Hall.
  • Lebas, Michel & Euske, Ken (2002). A conceptual and operational delineation of performance, in business performance measurement: Theory and Practice. Neely, Andrew, Editor. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Brookings Institution Press. Washington DC.
  • Maria Leticia Santos-Vijande & Luis I. Alvarez-Gonzalez (2007). TQM and firms performance: An EFQM excellence model research based survey. Int. Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 2 (2), 23.
  • Mouritsen J., Larsen, H.T., Bukh, P.N. & Johansen, M.R. (2001). Reading an intellectual capital statement: Describing and prescribing knowledge management strategies. Proceedings of the 4th Intangibles Conference, Stern School of Business, New York University, May 2001.
  • Neely, A.D. & Adams, C. (2000). Perspectives on performance: The performance prism. Gee Publishing, London.
  • Neilson, Robert (2000), Interview with Dr. Robert E. Neilson, chief knowledge officer and professor at the information resources management college (IRMC) of the National Defense University. CHIPS Magazine, Spring, http://www.chips.navy.mil/interview_with_dr.htm (10.01.2009).
  • Nevo D. & Wand, Y. (2005). Organizational memory information systems: A transactive memory approach. Decision Support Systems 39, 549–562.
  • Papalexandris, Alexandros, I. George, P. Gregory, & Soderquıst Klas Eric (2005). An integrated methodology for putting the balanced scorecard into action. European Management Journal, 23 (2), 214–227.
  • Parlby, D. ve Taylor, R. (2000). The power of knowledge: A business guide to knowledge management. www.kpmgconsulting.com/index.html (01.07.2008).
  • Procurement Executives’Association (2006). Guide to a balanced scorecard. Performance management methodology, (Eii/IDS), 6.
  • Ranjit Bose (2004). Knowledge management metrics. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104 (6), 457-468.
  • Reichheld, F.F. & Sasser (Jnr), W.E. (1990). Zero defections: Quality comes to services. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 105–11.
  • Roos J. (1996). Intellectual capital: What you can measure, you can manage, IMD perspectives for managers, No. 10, (URL http://www.imd.ch/pub/) (02.05.2009).
  • Rouse, P. & Putterill, M. (2003). An integral framework for performance measurement. Management Decision, 41(8), 791-805.
  • Svioka, John (2001). Knowledge pays, CIO Magazine, Feb 15, http://www.sveiby.com.au/ IntangibleMethods.htm (12.01.2009).
  • Sureshchandar, G.S & Leisten, Rainer (2005). Insights from research holistic scorecard: Strategic performance measurement and management in the software industry. Measurıng Business Excellence J. Vol. 9 (2), 12-29.
  • Sveiby, K.E. (2001). Methods for measuring intangible assets, http://www.sveiby.com.au/ IntangibleMethods.htm 20.09.2009.
  • The EFQM Excellence Model, http://www.efqm.org/new.org/new-website/model-awards/eqa/intro.htm 20.01.2009.
  • Wongarassame, S., P.D. Gardiner & J.E.L. Simmons (2003). Performance measurements tools, The balanced scorecard and the efqm excellence model. Measuring Business Excellence, 7 (1), 14-29.
Year 2010, Issue: 2, 59 - 76, 29.06.2010

Abstract

References

  • excellence model and knowledge management ımplications.
  • http://www.eknowledgecenter.com/articles (20.01.2009).
  • Du Plessis, M. ve Boon, J.A. (2004). The role of knowledge management in ebusiness and customer relationship management: South African case study findings. International Journal of Information Management, 24 (1), 73-86.
  • Dumond, E.J. (1994). Making Best use of performance measures and information. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(9), 16-31.
  • Eskildsen, J.K. & Dahlgaard, J.J. (2000). A causal model for employee satisfaction. The TQM Magazine, 11 (8), 1081-1094.
  • EFQM: The EFQM excellence model, 1999.
  • Ghobadian, Abby (1994). Characteristics, benefits and shortcomings of four major quality awards. The International Journal Of Quality And Reliability Management, 13 (2), 10-44
  • Gloet, M. Ve Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15 (5), 402-9.
  • Greiner, Martina E., Bohmann, Tilo & Krcmar & Helmut A. (2007). Strategy for knowledge management. Journal Of Knowledge Management, 11 (6), 2007, 3-15.
  • Jinette de Gooijer (2000). Designing a knowledge management performance framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4 (4), 303-310.
  • Kaplan, R. S. Ve Norton, D. P. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), Sep.-Oct., 134-142.
  • Kaplan, Robert S. & Norton, David P. (1996). The balanced scorecard – translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1996. Xi, 322.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balance scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 52–63.
  • Kerschberg, L. (2001). Knowledge management in heterogeneous data warehouse environments, proceedings of the third international conference on data warehousing and knowledge discovery. Lecture Notes In Computer Science , Vol. 2114, Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
  • Knapp, Ellen (1998). Knowledge management. Business & Economic Review, 44 (4), July – September 1998.
  • Kristensen, Kai et. al. (1998). Fundamentals of total quality management. Chapman & Hall.
  • Lebas, Michel & Euske, Ken (2002). A conceptual and operational delineation of performance, in business performance measurement: Theory and Practice. Neely, Andrew, Editor. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Brookings Institution Press. Washington DC.
  • Maria Leticia Santos-Vijande & Luis I. Alvarez-Gonzalez (2007). TQM and firms performance: An EFQM excellence model research based survey. Int. Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 2 (2), 23.
  • Mouritsen J., Larsen, H.T., Bukh, P.N. & Johansen, M.R. (2001). Reading an intellectual capital statement: Describing and prescribing knowledge management strategies. Proceedings of the 4th Intangibles Conference, Stern School of Business, New York University, May 2001.
  • Neely, A.D. & Adams, C. (2000). Perspectives on performance: The performance prism. Gee Publishing, London.
  • Neilson, Robert (2000), Interview with Dr. Robert E. Neilson, chief knowledge officer and professor at the information resources management college (IRMC) of the National Defense University. CHIPS Magazine, Spring, http://www.chips.navy.mil/interview_with_dr.htm (10.01.2009).
  • Nevo D. & Wand, Y. (2005). Organizational memory information systems: A transactive memory approach. Decision Support Systems 39, 549–562.
  • Papalexandris, Alexandros, I. George, P. Gregory, & Soderquıst Klas Eric (2005). An integrated methodology for putting the balanced scorecard into action. European Management Journal, 23 (2), 214–227.
  • Parlby, D. ve Taylor, R. (2000). The power of knowledge: A business guide to knowledge management. www.kpmgconsulting.com/index.html (01.07.2008).
  • Procurement Executives’Association (2006). Guide to a balanced scorecard. Performance management methodology, (Eii/IDS), 6.
  • Ranjit Bose (2004). Knowledge management metrics. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104 (6), 457-468.
  • Reichheld, F.F. & Sasser (Jnr), W.E. (1990). Zero defections: Quality comes to services. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 105–11.
  • Roos J. (1996). Intellectual capital: What you can measure, you can manage, IMD perspectives for managers, No. 10, (URL http://www.imd.ch/pub/) (02.05.2009).
  • Rouse, P. & Putterill, M. (2003). An integral framework for performance measurement. Management Decision, 41(8), 791-805.
  • Svioka, John (2001). Knowledge pays, CIO Magazine, Feb 15, http://www.sveiby.com.au/ IntangibleMethods.htm (12.01.2009).
  • Sureshchandar, G.S & Leisten, Rainer (2005). Insights from research holistic scorecard: Strategic performance measurement and management in the software industry. Measurıng Business Excellence J. Vol. 9 (2), 12-29.
  • Sveiby, K.E. (2001). Methods for measuring intangible assets, http://www.sveiby.com.au/ IntangibleMethods.htm 20.09.2009.
  • The EFQM Excellence Model, http://www.efqm.org/new.org/new-website/model-awards/eqa/intro.htm 20.01.2009.
  • Wongarassame, S., P.D. Gardiner & J.E.L. Simmons (2003). Performance measurements tools, The balanced scorecard and the efqm excellence model. Measuring Business Excellence, 7 (1), 14-29.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Hüseyin Yılmaz

Publication Date June 29, 2010
Submission Date January 30, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yılmaz, H. (2010). Bilgi Yönetimi Sürecinde Performans Yönetim Modellerinin Uygulanması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.20875/sb.78173