Yönetim Alan Yazınında Çağının Ötesindeki Bir İsim: Mary Parker Follett

Year 2022, , 88 - 108, 15.05.2022

Nurcan Akbaş , Bahar Taner

https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1089947

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Mary Parker Follett yönetim teorilerini zamanının ötesinde bir yaklaşımla ele alan önemli bir bilim insanıdır. Follett, yönetim felsefesinde sosyal bilimlerin tüm alanlarını kapsayan önemli çalışmalar yapmış, günümüze ve geleceğe ışık tutan değerli kavramlar ortaya atmıştır. Yönetimde devrim niteliğinde çığır açması gerekirken, böylesine önemli bir beynin yönetim alan yazında ve uygulamalarında hak ettiği ilgiden yoksun kalması çok büyük eksikliktir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Follett’in güçlü yönetim felsefesini tanıtmak, getirdiği kavramlara yönelik önemli ipuçları vermek ve onun öngörülerinin zamanımızda yaşanan yönetim sorunlarına çözüm üretme potansiyelini değerlendirmektir. Araştırmada, alan yazın taramasına dayanarak Follett’in teorilerini nasıl oluşturduğu, teorilerinin güçlü ve zayıf yönleri ve teorilerine yönelik çeşitli görüşler ele alınmıştır. Yaşamından sunulan kesitlerle teorilerini nasıl oluşturduğuna, teorilerine yönelik çeşitli görüşlere yer verilmiş ve yönetim felsefesinin güçlü ve zayıf yönleri analiz edilmiştir. Gerek anlatıda gerek analiz ve yorumlarda alan yazından sağlanan görüşler temel alınmıştır.

Keywords

Durum Yasası, Yönetim, Güç, Bütünleşme, Mary Parker Follett

A Name Ahead of Her Time in Management Literature: Mary Parker Follett

Abstract

Mary Parker Follett is an important scientist who deals with management theories with anapproach that is beyond her time. Follett has undertaken important studies covering all areas of social sciences in management, and put forward valuable concepts that shed light on the present and the future. While it is supposed to be a revolutionary breakthrough in management, it is a great shortcoming that such an important brain lacks the attention she deserves in management fields and applications. The aim of this research is to introduce Follett’s strong management philosophy, to give important clues to the concepts she birings, and to evaluate the potential of her predictions to solve the management problems in our time. The study looked at how Follett created her theories based on scanning the literature, the strengths and weaknesses of her theories, and various insights into her theories. On the basis of the sections presented from her life, various opinions about her theories and how she formulated her theories and the strengths and weaknesses of her theories were analyzed. The data obtained from the literatüre served as the basis in the narrative, in the analysies and in the comments.

Keywords

Mary Parker Follett, Management, Power With, Law of Situation, Integration

References

• ANSOFF, Harry Igor (1980), “Strategic Issue Management”, Strategic Management Journal, S.1(2), ss.131-148.
• ARGYRIS, Chris (1977), “Double Loop Learning in Organizations”, Harvard Business Review, S.55(5), ss.115-125.
• ARMSTRONG, Jon Scott (1977), “Social Irresponsibility in Management”, Journal of Business Research, S.5(3), ss.185-213.
• ARMSTRONG, Jon Scott ve GREEN, Kesten (2013), “Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility Policies”, Journal of Business Research, S.66(10), ss.1922-1927.
• BENNIS, Warren (1995), “The Essentials of Leadership”, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management - A Celebration of Writings from the 1920 (Ed. Pauline Graham), Harvard Business School Press, Boston - MA, ss.163-177.
• BERMAN, Shawn Lecord ve VAN BUREN, Harry (2015), “Mary Parker Follett Managerial Responsibility and the Future of Capitalism”, Futures, S.68, ss.44-56.
• BIRKENMAIER, Julie ve BERG-WEGER, Maria (2017), The Practice of Generalist Social Work, Routledge Publisher, New York (US).
• BOLEN, Jean Shinoda (2013, Moving Toward the Millionth Circle: Energizing the Global Women’s Movement, Conari Press, Newburyport.
• CHILD, John (2013), “Mary Parker Follett”, Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists (Ed. Morgen Witzel, Malcolm Warner), Oxford University Press, Oxford, ss.74-93.
• CRESWELL, John Ward (2013), Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Ed./Çev. Mesut Bütün, Selçuk Beşir Demir), Siyasal Kitabevi, İstanbul.
• DAVIS, Albie Matt (2015), “When Webb Met Follett: Negotiation Theory and the Race to the Moon”, Negotiation Journal, S.31(3), ss.267-283.
• DE BONO, Edward (1991), Handbook for the Positive Revolution, Penguin Press, London.
• DEMING, William Edwards (1986), Out of the Crisis, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering, Cambridge.
• DRUCKER, Peter Ferdinand (1987), The Frontiers of Management, Heinemann, London.
• DRUCKER, Peter Ferdinand (1995), “Introduction, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management”, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management - A Celebration of Writings from the 1920 (Ed. Pauline Graham), Harvard Business School Press, Boston (US), ss.1-10.
• DUGGAN, Stephen Pierce (2018), The League of Nations, the Principle and the Practice, Forgotten Books Press, London (UK).
• EASTERBY-SMITH, Mark ve LYLES, Marjorie (2003), “Re-Reading Organizational Learning: Selective Memory, Forgetting and Adaptation”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, S.17(2), ss.51-55.
• EYLON, Dafna (1998), “Understanding Empowerment and Resolving its Paradox: Lessons from Mary Parker Follett”, Journal of Management History, S.4(1), ss.16-28.
• FAYOL, Henri (1988), General and Industrial Management, Pitman Press, London.
• FISHER, Roger, URY, William ve PATTON, Bruce (2011), Getting to Yes: The Secret to Successful Negotiation, Penguin Books Publisher, New York (US).
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1896), The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Longmans, Green and Co., New York (US).
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1918), The New State Group Organization, the Solution of Popular Government, Longmans, Green and Co., New York (US).
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1919), “Community is a Process”, The Philosophical Review, S.28(6), ss.576-588.
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1923, Haldane Introduction to the New State, Longmans, Green and Co., New York (US).
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1924), The Creative Experience, Longmans, Green and Co., New York (US).
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1925), The Law of the Situation, Longmans, Green and Co., New York (US).
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1941), Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, New York (US).
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1949), Freedom and Coordination: Lectures in Business Organization, Management Publications Trust Limited, New York (US).
• FOLLETT, Mary Parker (1970), “The Teacher-Student Relation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, S.15, ss.137-148.
• FREEMAN, Robert Edward (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman Publisher, Boston (US).
• FREEMAN, Robert Edward (2010), Stakeholder Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• FREEMAN, Robert Edward ve PHILLIPS, Robert Allan (2002), “Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense”, Business Ethics Quarterly, S.12(03), ss.331-349.
• FRY, Brian ve LOTTE, Thomas (1996), “Mary Parker Follett: Assessing the Contribution and Impact of her Writings”, Journal of Management History, S.2, ss.11-19.
• GALBRAITH, Jay (1971), “Matrix Organization Designs How to Combine Functional and Project Forms”, Business Horizons, S.14(1), ss.29-40.
• GAO (1971), General Accounting Office Fiftieth Anniversary: Improving Management for More Effective Government, September 17, General Accounting Office Press, Washington DC.
• GERZEMA, John ve D’ANTONIO, Michael (2013), The Athena Doctrine: How Women and the Men (Who Think Like Them) will Rule the Future, Jossey-Bass Publisher, San Francisco (US).
• GRAHAM, Pauline (1995), “Mary Parker Follett (1868-1933): A Pioneering Life”, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management - A Celebration of Writings from the 1920 (Ed. Pauline Graham), Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA, ss.11-34.
• GRANT, Robert Morris (2008), “Why Strategy Teaching should be Theory Based”, Journal of Management Inquiry, S.17(4), ss.276-281.
• HENIG, Ruth (2006), Versailles and After, 1919-1933, Routledge Publisher, New York (US).
• JOHNSON, Avis Lenore (2007), “Mary Parker Follett: Laying the Foundations for Spirituality in the Workplace”, International Journal of Public Administration, S.30(4), ss.425-439.
• JURAN, Joseph (1995), Managerial Breakthrough: The Classic Book on Improving Management Performance, McGraw-Hill Publisher, New York (US).
• KANTER, Rosabeth Moss (1985), “Drucker: the Unsolved Puzzle”, New Management, S.2(1), ss.10-13.
• KANTER, Rosabeth Moss (1990), When Giants Learn to Dance, Simon and Schuster, Chicago
• KANTER, Rosabeth Moss (1995), “Preface”, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management - A Celebration of Writings from the 1920 (Ed. Pauline Graham), Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge - MA, ss.XIII.
• LIND, John Edward (1924), ‘‘Facts Are Only Facts after All’’, New York Times, June 8, 1924, s.11.
• LINDEMAN, Eduard Christian (1934), “Mary Parker Follett”, Survey Graphic, S.23, ss.86-87.
• LIVINGSTON, John Sterling. (1988), “Pygmalion in Management”, Harvard Business Review, S.66(5), ss.121-130.
• MCGREGOR, Douglas (1957), The Human Side of Enterprise, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge - MA.
• MCLARNEY, Carolan ve RHYNO, Shelley (1999), “Mary Parker Follett: Visionary Leadership and Strategic Management”, Women in Management Review, S.14(7), ss.292-304.
• MERRIAM-WEBSTER INC. (2005), The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Merriam-Webster Publisher, Springfield - MA.
• MICHELS, Roberto (1911/1962), Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, Free Press, New York (US).
• NOHRIA, Nitin (1995), “The Basis of Authority 141 Commentary Mary Parker Follett's View on Power, the Giving of Orders, and Authority: An Alternative to Hierarchy or a Utopian Ideology?”, Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management - A Celebration of Writings from the 1920 (Ed. Pauline Graham), Harvard Business School Press, Boston - MA, ss.141-162.
• NOVICEVIC, Milorad, HUMPHREYS, John, BUCKLEY, Ronald, ROBERTS, Foster, HEBDON Andrew ve KIM, Jaemin (2013), “Teaching as Constructive-Developmental Leadership: Insights from Mary Follett”, Journal of Management History, S.19(4), ss.423-440.
• NUTT, Paul Charles ve BACKOFF, Robert Wadlow (1993), “Organizational Publicness and its Implications for Strategic Management”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, S.3(2), ss.209-231.
• O’CONNOR, Ellen (2000), “Integrating Follett History, Philosophy and Management”, Journal of Management History, S.6(4), ss.167-190.
• PARKER, Lee (1984), “Control in Organizational Life: The Contribution of Mary Parker Follett”, Academy of Management Review, S.9(4), ss.736–745.
• PEARCE, Jenny (2013), “Power and the Twenty‐First Century Activist: From the Neighbourhood to the Square”, Development and Change, S.44(3), ss.639-663.
• PETERS, Thomas (1987), Thriving on Chaos, Macmillan Publisher, London.
• PETERSON, Helen (2018), “From Goal-Orientated, Strong and Decisive Leader to Collaborative and Communicative Listener, Gendered Shifts in Vice-chancellor Ideals, 1990- 2018”, Education Sciences, S.8(90), ss.1-17.
• PETRICK, Joseph (2012), “Sustainable Stakeholder Capitalism: A Moral Vision of Responsible Global Financial Risk Management”, Journal of Business Ethics, S.99(9), ss.3-109.
• PHELPS, Lonnie, PARAYITAM, Satyanarayana ve OLSON, Bradley (2007), “Edward Deming, Mary P. Follett and Frederick Taylor: Reconciliation of Differences in Organizational and Strategic Leadership”, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, S.6, ss.1-14.
• POLAK, Frank., VERVENNE, Marc (1996), Theophany and Mediator: The Unfolding of a Theme in the Book of Exodus. Studies in the Book of Exodus, Redaction-Reception-Interpretation, (Ed. Marc Vervenne), Leuven University Press and Peeters, Leuven, ss.113-147.
• PUYT, Richard, LIE, Finn Birger, DE GRAAF, Frank Jan ve WILDEROM, Celeste (2020), “Origins of SWOT Analysis”, Academy of Management, S.1, ss.17410-17416.
• RYAN, Lori Verstegen ve RUTHERFORD, Matthew (2000), “Mary Parker Follett: Individidualist, Collectivist? or Both?”, Journal of Management History, S.6(5), ss.207-223.
• SCHILLING, Melissa (2000), “Decades Ahead of her Time: Advancing Stakeholder Theory Through the Ideas of Mary Parker Follett”, Journal of Management History, S.6(5), ss.224-242.
• SENGE, Peter (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday Publisher, New York (US).
• SETHI, Narendra Kumar (1962), “Mary Parker Follett: Pioneer in Management Theory”, Academy of Management Journal, S.5(3), ss.214-221.
• SEVIER, Robert Allen (2001), “Brand as Relevance”, The Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, S.10(3), ss.77-96.
• TAYLOR, Frederick Winslow (1911), Principles of Scientific Management, Harper and Brothers Publisher, New York and London.
• TONN, Joan (2003), Mary. P. Follett, Creating Democracy, Transforming Management, Yale University Press, London.
• URWICK, Lyndall Fownes ve BRECH, Edward Francis Leopold (1945), The Making of Scientific Management, Management Publications Trust Press, London (UK).
• UTTERBACK, James (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston – Mass (US).
• WEBB, James Ernest (1971), Leadership Evaluation in Large-Scale Efforts, Lecture, General Accounting Office Fiftieth Anniversary: Improving Management for More Effective Government, September 17, Government Accounting Office Publisher, Washington DC, http://gao.gov/assets/670/667904.pdf (Data of Access: 19.07.2021).
• WEBER, Max (1947), The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations, Oxford University Press, New York (US).
• WEIHRICH, Heinz (1982), “The Tows Matrix-a Tool for Situational Analysis”, Long Range Planning, S.15(2), ss.54-66.
• WELSER, Howard Ted (2015), “Breaking The Iron Law of Oligarchy: Computational Institutions, Organizational Fidelity and Distributed Social Control”, Roles, Trust, And Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets (Ed. Elisa Bertino, Sorin Matei), Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, ss.121-144.
• WILKINSON, Adrian (1998), “Empowerment: Theory and Practice”, Personnel Review, S.27(1), ss.40-56.