Impact of Think Tanks on Public Policy: Can it be Measured?

Abstract

The extent to which think tanks, as public policy actors, truly influence policy decisions remains a subject of ongoing debate. This uncertainty stems not only from the difficulty of attributing complex policy outcomes to a single actor but also from the challenges of defining and measuring the concept of “influence.” This article aims to explore how and to what extent think tanks influence public policymaking and proposes an analytical framework for measuring such influence. To this end, it examines and compares major studies and approaches on think tanks worldwide, highlighting their similarities and differences to develop a synthesized perspective. Research shows that think tanks, which rely on financial support for their sustainability, often seek to project an image of significant influence on public policy and public opinion in order to secure continued funding. This results in increased emphasis on media visibility and a tendency to equate visibility with impact, sometimes accompanied by exaggerated claims of effectiveness. The findings suggest that think tanks may not be as influential as they claim yet are likely more influential than their critics assume. Future research should shift its focus from simply assessing how much influence think tanks have, to examining the nature, quality, and value of their contributions to key policy debates.

Keywords

• Think Tanks
• Impact of Think Tanks
• Public Policy

Düşünce Kuruluşlarının Kamu Politikalarına Etkisi Ölçülebilir mi?

Öz

Bir kamu politikası aktörü olarak düşünce kuruluşlarının kamu politikaları üzerinde gerçekten etkili olup olmadıkları ya da ne ölçüde etkili oldukları hâlâ tartışma konusudur. Bu belirsizlikte, karmaşık kamu politikası süreçlerinde etkilerin belirli bir aktöre atfedilmesinin güçlüğü kadar, “etki” kavramının tanımlanması ve ölçülmesinin zorluğu da önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, düşünce kuruluşlarının kamu politikalarındaki etkilerini tartışmak ve bu etkinin nasıl ölçülebileceğine dair analitik bir çerçeve sunmaktır. Bu doğrultuda, alandaki temel çalışmalar ve yaklaşımlar karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiş, benzerlik ve farklılıklar üzerinden bir senteze ulaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırmalar, maddi destekle varlığını sürdüren düşünce kuruluşlarının, etkili oldukları algısını güçlendirmek için medya görünürlüğüne ve etki iddialarına ağırlık verdiklerini göstermektedir. Bu durum, “görünürlük = etki” algısını beslemekte ve zaman zaman abartılı etkili olma söylemleriyle desteklenmektedir. Ancak sonuçlar, düşünce kuruluşlarının ne kendi ilan ettikleri kadar etkili, ne de bazı eleştirmenlerin varsaydığı kadar etkisiz olduğunu göstermektedir. Gelecekteki araştırmaların, düşünce kuruluşlarının yalnızca ne kadar etkili olduklarını ölçmeye odaklanmak yerine, politika tartışmalarına olan katkılarını ve bu katkıların niteliğini analiz etmeye yönelmesi gerektiği önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Düşünce Kuruluşları
• Düşünce Kuruluşlarının Etkisi
• Kamu Politikası

References

1. ABELSON, Donald E. (2002), Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Policy Institutes, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.
2. ABELSON, Donald E. (2006), A Capitol Idea: Think Tanks and US Foreign Policy, McGill-Queen's University Press-MQUP, Montreal.
3. ABELSON, Donald E. (2014), “Old World, New World: The Evolution and Influence of Foreign Affairs Think‐Tanks”, International Affairs, S.90(1), ss.125-142.
4. ABELSON, Donald E. (2016a), “It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time: Reflections on the Evolution of American Think Tanks”, Canadian Review of American Studies / Revue canadienne d’études américaines, S.46(1), ss.139-157.
5. ABELSON, Donald E. (2016b), Northern Lights: Exploring Canada’s Think Tank Landscape, McGill-Queen's University Press-MQUP, Montreal.
6. ALMIRON, Nuria (2017), “Favoring the Elites: Think Tanks and Discourse Coalitions”, International Journal of Communication, S.11, ss.4350-4369.
7. BACHRACH, Peter ve BARATZ, Morton S. (1970), Power and Poverty, Oxford University Press, New York.
8. BABUR, Mehmet Münip (2021), “Bilginin Ticarileşmesi: Düşünce Kuruluşları”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, S.68, ss.106-132.

9. BAĞCI, Hüseyin ve AYDIN, Aziz (2009), “Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Düşünce Kuruluşu Kültürü”, Türkiye’de Stratejik Düşünce Kültürü ve Stratejik Araştırma Merkezleri: Başlangıcından Bugüne Türk Düşünce Kuruluşları (Ed. Hasan Kanbolat, Hasan Ali Karasar), Nobel Yayınları, Ankara, ss.57-123.
10. CHANCE, Alek (2016), Think Tanks in the United States: Activities, Agendas, and Influence, Institute for China-America Studies, Washington.
11. DOMHOFF, G. William (2014), Who Rules America? The Triumph of the Corporate Rich, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 7. Baskı.
12. JAMES, Simon (2000), “Influencing Government Policy Making”, Banking on Knowledge: The Genesis of the Global Development Network (Ed. Diane Stone), Routledge Publisher, London, ss.165-182.
13. JEZIERSKA, Katarzyna (2020), “Three Types of Denial: Think Tanks as a Reluctant Civil Society Elite”, Politics and Governance, S.8(3), ss.152-161.
14. KAVANAGH, Jennifer ve RICH, Michael D. (2018), Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life, RAND Corporation, California.
15. KÖLLNER, Patrick (2013), “Think Tanks: The Quest to Define and to Rank Them”, GIGA Focus International Edition, S.10, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Hamburg.
16. KRASTEV, Ivan (2001), “Think Tanks: Making and Faking Influence”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, S.1(2), ss.17-38.
17. KUNTZ, Fred (2013), “Communications and Impact Metrics for Think Tanks”, Centre for International Governance Innovation, https://www.cigionline.org/articles/communications-and-impact-metrics-think-tanks (Erişim Tarihi: 22.04.2025).
18. LADI, Stella (2011), “Think Tanks”, International Encyclopedia of Political Science (Ed. Bertrand Badie, Dirk Berg-Schlosser, Leonardo Morlino), SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, ss.2608-2611.
19. McGANN, James G. (1992), “Academics to Ideologues: A Brief history of the Public Policy Research Industry”, PS: Political Science & Politics, S.25(4), ss.733-740.
20. McGANN, James G. (2003), “Think Tanks and the Transnationalization of Foreign Policy”, Connections, S.2(1), ss.85-90.
21. McGANN, James G. (2007), Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the US: Academics, Advisors and Advocates, Routledge Publisher, New York.
22. McGANN, James G. (2016), The Fifth Estate: Think Tanks, Public Policy, and Governance, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.
23. McGANN, James G. (2019), “Think Tanks, Foreign Policy, and Emerging Powers”, Think Tanks, Foreign Policy and the Emerging Powers (Ed. James McGann), Palgrave Macmillan Publisher, Cham, ss.17-59.
24. MEDVETZ, Thomas (2008), Think Tanks as an Emergent Field, Social Science Research Council Publisher, New York.
25. MEDVETZ, Thomas (2012), “Murky Power: ‘Think Tanks’ as Boundary Organizations”, Rethinking Forms of Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets (Ed. David Courpasson, Damon Golsorkhi, Jeffre J. Sallaz), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bradford, ss.113-133.
26. MENDIZABAL, Enrique (2025), “As the World Turns Authoritarian: Strategies for Think Tanks and Their Funders”, On Think Tanks, https://onthinktanks.org/articles/as-the-world-turns-authoritarian-strategies-for-think-tanks-and-their-funders/ (Erişim Tarihi: 27.04.2025).
27. PAUTZ, Hartwig (2011), “Revisiting The Think-tank Phenomenon”, Public Policy and Administration, S.26(4), ss.419-435.
28. PLEHWE, Dieter (2015), “The Politics of Policy Think Tanks: Organizing Expertise, Legitimacy and Counter-Expertise in Policy Networks”, Handbook of Critical Policy Studies (Ed. Frank Fischer, Douglas Torgerson, Anna Durnová, Michael Orsini), Edward Elgar Publishing, London, ss.358-379.
29. RICH, Andrew Owen (2004), Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. SOBOTKOVÁ, Lucie ve KULAÇ, Onur (2020), “The Success of Think Tanks in Turkey and the Czech Republic: A Comparative Analysis in the 10-Year Perspective”, AGATHOS: An International Review of the Humanities and Social Sciences, S.11(1), ss.356–378.
31. STONE, Diane (1996), Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process, Frank Cass, London.
32. STONE, Diane (2000), “Think Tank Transnationalisation and Non-profit Analysis, Advice and Advocacy”, Global Society, S.14(2), ss.153-172.
33. STONE, Diane (2004), “Introduction: Think Tanks, Policy Advice and Governance”, Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas (Ed. Diane Stone ve Andrew Denham), Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York, ss.1-16.
34. STONE, Diane (2005), “Think Tanks and Policy Advice in Countries in Transition”, The Asian Development Bank Institute Symposium: “How to Strengthen Policy-Oriented Research and Training in Vietnam”, August 31, 2005, Hanoi.
35. STONE, Diane (2007), “Recycling Bins, Garbage Cans or Think Tanks? Three Myths Regarding Policy Analysis Institutes”, Public Administration, S.85(2), ss.259-278.
36. STONE, Diane (2013), Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora, Palgrave Macmillan Publisher, London.
37. STONE, Diane ve ULLRICH, Heidi (2003), “Policy Research Institutes and Think Tanks in Western Europe: Development Trends and Perspectives”, Discussion Paper: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute, Budapest - Hungary.
38. TERÁN VALDEZ, Estafania (2025), “Think Tanks and Impact: The Broader Influence of Think Tanks in the Policy Ecosystem”, On Think Tanks, https://onthinktanks.org/articles/think-tanks-and-impact-the-broader-influence-of-think-tanks-in-the-policy-ecosystem/ (Erişim Tarihi: 23.05.2025).
39. THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION (2024), 2024 Annual Report, The Brookings Institution Washington, Washington DC.
40. THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION (2025), “Heritage Has Won Victories Benefiting All Americans”, The Heritage Kurumsal Web Sayfası, https://www.heritage.org/about-heritage/impact (Erişim Tarihi: 26.05.2025).
41. TROY, Tevi (2012), “Devaluing the Think Tank”, National Affairs, S.10, ss.75-90.
42. WEAVER, R. Kent (1989), “The Changing World of Think Tanks”, PS: Political Science & Politics, S.22(3), ss.563-578.
43. WEIDENBAUM, Murray (2010), “Measuring the Influence of Think Tanks”, Society, S.47(2), ss.134-137.
44. WEIDENBAUM, Murray (2011), “Washington Think Tanks Had Better Start Thinking Harder and Fast”, USA Today Magazine, S.139(2792), ss.10-11.
45. XIN, Hua (2023), “The Influence of Chinese Foreign Policy Think Tanks on China’s EU Policy: A Comparative Analysis of CIIS and SIIS”, Asia Europe Journal, S.21(2), ss.173-208.
46. ZAYTSEV, Dimitry G., KUSKOVA, Valentina V. ve KONONOVA, Alexandra A. (2021), “The Power of Knowledge: How Think Tanks Impact US Foreign Policy”, Foreign Policy Analysis, S.18(1), ss.(orab34).
47. ZHAO, Jing ve ZHU, Xufeng (2023), “Spreading Expertise: Think Tanks as Digital Advocators in the Social Media Era”, Policy and Society, S.42(3), ss.359-377.