The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of ethanol extracts of Hydnum repandum, Tricholoma fracticum and Russula emetica mushrooms against some standard pathogenic microorganisms and anti-MRSA activity against clinically originated Methycilline Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. Broth microdilution method was used to determine the antimicrobial activity. Ethanol extract of H. repandum had antimicrobial activity against standard microorganisms at doses of 0.02 – 3.12 mg/ml, the highest activity was found against Gram positive Bacillus cereus strain with a Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) value of 0.02 mg/ml. It was also found to have antifungal activity against Candida albicans with a MIC value of 1.56 mg/ml. It was determined that the ethanol extract of H. repandum showed anti-MRSA activity against all clinically sourced MRSA strains at doses ranging from 0.39 to 3.12 mg/ml. The highest antibacterial activity of the ethanol extract of Tricholoma fracticum was similarly determined against B. cereus at a dose of 0.39 mg/ml, while it was observed to have low activity against some of the other strains studied. It was also found that this species did not have antifungal activity. It was seen that it had weak anti-MRSA activity only against four MRSA strains. It was determined that the ethanol extract of Russula emetica had only a weak effect against Salmonella enteritidis at a dose of 3.12 mg/ml, and a moderate effect against B. cereus at a dose of 0.39 mg/ml. It was found that it did not have any antimicrobial activity against other standard strains and C. albicans. It was also seen that it did not have anti-MRSA activity against clinically sourced MRSA strains. It was concluded that the ethanol extract of H. repandum had higher antimicrobial activity against standard pathogenic microorganisms and clinically sourced MRSA strains compared to other species.
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Hydnum repandum, Tricholoma fracticum ve Russula emetica mantarlarının etanol ekstraktlarının bazı standart patojen mikroorganizmalara antimikrobiyal ve klinik kaynaklı Metisilin Dirençli Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) suşlarına karşı anti-MRSA aktivitesinin belirlenmesidir. Antimikrobiyal aktiviteyi belirlemek için sıvı mikrodilüsyon metodu kullanılmıştır. Hydnum repandum’un etanol ekstraktı standart mikroorganizmalar üzerine 0.02 – 3.12 mg/ ml dozlarında antimikrobiyal aktiviteye sahip olduğu, en yüksek aktivitenin 0.02 mg/ml Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu (MİK) değeriyle Gram pozitif Bacillus cereus suşuna karşı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca Candida albicans’a karşı belirlenen 1.56 mg/ml MİK değeriyle antifungal bir aktiviteye sahip olduğu da saptanmıştır. H. repandum’un etanol ekstraktının denenen klinik kaynaklı MRSA suşlarının hepsine 0.39 – 3.12 mg/ml arasında değişen dozlarda anti- MRSA aktivite gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Tricholoma fracticum’un etanol ekstraktının en yüksek antibakteriyal aktivitesinin benzer şekilde 0.39 mg/ml dozla B. cereus suşuna karşı tespit edilmiş olup çalışılan diğer suşların bazılarına düşük bir aktiviteye sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Bu türün ayrıca antifungal bir aktiviteye sahip olmadığı saptanmıştır. Sadece dört MRSA suşuna karşı da zayıf bir anti-MRSA aktivitesine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Russula emetica’nın etanol ekstraktının ise sadece Salmonella enteritidis’e 3.12 mg/ml dozunda zayıf bir etki, B. cereus’a 0.39 mg/ml dozunda ise orta derecede bir etki gösterdiği saptanmıştır. Çalışılan diğer standart suşlara ve C. albicans’a karşı da herhangi bir antimikrobiyal aktiviteye sahip olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca çalışılan klinik kaynaklı MRSA suşlarının üzerine anti-MRSA aktivitesinin olmadığı saptanmıştır. Diğer türlerle kıyaslandığında H. repandum’un etanol ekstraktının standart patojen mikroorganizmalara ve klinik kaynaklı MRSA suşlarına karşı daha yüksek oranda antimikrobiyal aktiviteye sahip olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Mycology |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | March 17, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | April 17, 2025 |
| Publication Date | April 30, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 16 Issue: 1 |
The works submitted to our journals are first judged grammatically. After this phase, articles are sent two reviewers. If necessary, the third reviewer is assessed. In the publication of works, a decision is made by evaluating the level of contribution to science and readers within the criteria specified in the writing rules. Reviewers are requested to submit their assessments within 30 days at the latest. The reviewers' evaluations and the answers to these evaluations are reviewed by the editor and it is decided whether the work will be published or not.
International Peer Reviewed Journal
The journal doesn’t have APC or any submission charges

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License