AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NDE BÖLGESEL DENGESİZLİKLER VE BU DENGESİZLİKLERİ GİDERMEYE YÖNELİK EKONOMİK POLİTİKALARIN ANALİZİ

Year 2013, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 111 - 137, 27.06.2013

M. Akif Kara , Seyhan Taş

https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.113

Abstract

Regional policies which are implemented to decrease the regional imbalances increased by the enlargement of the European Union and to increasethe income and employment in underdeveloped regions are linked to certain goals depending  Öğr. Gör. Dr. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, e-posta: [e-mail] Doç. Dr. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, e-posta: [e-mail] the priorities of the use of financial instruments. During 2007-2013, it is expected that there will be important expenditures as part of the regional economic policies with the aim of converging the income of the regions, increasing the competitive structure and employment in the regions, and improving the cooperation among the regions. It will be possible to state that regional economic policies contribute to the convergence of the income in underdeveloped regions and nations in the union, and considerably increase in the employment. These policies that change in time, may be reshaped depending on the challenging areas in the future.

Keywords

Regional Disparities, Regional policies. Convergence, Regional Competitiveness, Cooperation

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NDE BÖLGESEL DENGESİZLİKLER VE BU DENGESİZLİKLERİ GİDERMEYE YÖNELİK EKONOMİK POLİTİKALARIN ANALİZİ

Abstract

Özellikle Avrupa Birliği’nin genişleme süreciyle birlikte boyutları artan bölgesel dengesizlikleri gidermek ve geri kalmış bölgelerde gelir ve istihdam artışı sağlamak amacıyla uygulanan bölgesel ekonomik politikalar, finansal araçların kullanım önceliklerine bağlı olarak bir takım hedeflere bağlanmıştır. İçinde bulunulan 2007-2013 döneminde, bölgeler arası gelir yakınsamasını sağlamak, bölgelerde rekabetçi yapıyı ve istihdamı artırmak ve bölgeler arası işbirliğini geliştirmek amacıyla, bölgesel ekonomik politikalar çerçevesinde önemli harcamalar yapılması beklenmektedir. Uygulanan bölgesel ekonomik politikaların, Birliğin geri kalmış ülke ve bölgelerinde gelir yakınsamasına katkıda bulunduğu, gelir ve istihdamda önemli oranda artışlar sağladığı ifade edilebilecektir. Zaman içerisinde bazı değişimler gösteren bu politikalar, gelecekteki mücadele alanlarına bağlı olarak da yeniden şekillenebilecektir.

Keywords

Bölgesel Dengesizlik, Bölgesel Politikalar, Yakınsama, Bölgesel Rekabet, İşbirliği

References

• Armstrong, Harvey. & Taylor. Jim. (2005). Regional Economics and Policy, Blackwell Puplishing, Oxford
• Bachtler, J. (1997). ‘Reforming the Structural Funds: Options for Chance’, Regional and Industrial Research Paper Series, European Policies Research Centre, Universty of Strathclyde.
• Bachtler, J. & Mıchie. R. (1995). “A New Era in Regional Policy Evaluation? The Appraisal of the Structural Funds”, Regional Studies, 28(8), 745-751.
• Bachtler, J. and Wishlade. F. (2004). ‘Searching for Consensus: The Debate on Reforming EU Cohesion Policy’, European Policies Research Centre, Universty of Strathclyde.
• Bachtler, J. and Yuill. D. (2001). ‘Policies and Strategies for Regional Development: A Shift in Paradigm?’, European Policies Research Centre, Universty of Strathclyde.
• Bachtler, J.,Wishlade, F. and Yuill, D. (2001). ‘Regional Policy in Europe After Enlargement’ European Policies Research Centre, Universty of Strathclyde.
• Bachtler, J., Wıshlade, F. and Yuill. D. (2003). ‘Regional policies After 2006:
• Complementarity or Conflict’, European Policies Research Centre, Unıversty of Strathclyde. Boldrin, M. & Canova. F. (2001). İnequalty and Convergence in Europe’s Region: Reconsidering European Regional Policies. Economic Policy. 19(32), 207-253.
• Campo, D. C., Monteiro, F. M. C. & Soares. O. J. (2008). The European Regional Policy and the Socio-Economic Diversty of European regions: A Multivariate Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 187, 600-612.
• Dall’erba, S. & Le Gallo. (2008). Regional Convergence and the Impact of European Structural Funds over 1989-1999: a Spatial Econometric Analysis, Papers in Regional Science, 87(2), 219-244.
• Dıjk, J., Folmer, H. and Oosterhaven. J.(2009). ‘Regional Policy: Rationale, Foundations and Measurement of Its Effects’, Capello, R. and Nijkamp, P.(eds), Handbook of Regional Grovth and Development Theories, Massachusets, Edvard Elgar,
• DPT. (2008). ‘Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı, Bölgesel Gelişme Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu’. Ankara.
• European Commission. (2005). ‘Cohesion policy in Support of Growth anf Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines 2007-2013’. Belçika.
• _____.(2006). ‘Regional Policy’ http://ec.europa.eu/regioanl_policy, Retrieved (12.02.2012)
• _____.(2007a). ‘Growing Regions, Growing Europe. Fourth Report on Economic, Social and Terriotorial Cohesion’. Belçika.
• _____.(2007b). ‘Cohesion Policy 2007-13’. Commentaries and Offical Texts. Belçika.
• _____.(2008a). ‘Regions of Future Challenges for EU Regions’. Belçika.
• _____.(2008b). ‘Bölgeler İçin Çalışıyoruz. AB Bölgesel Politikası 2007-2013’. Belçika.
• _____.(2010). ‘Investing in Europe’s Future. Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Terriotorial Cohesion’, Belçika.
• ____.(2011a). ‘The Urban and Regional Dimension of Eurupre 2020. Seventh Progress Report on Economic, Social and Terriotorial Cohesion’. Belçika.
• _____.(2011b). ‘Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. Investing in Growth and Jobs’. Belçika 20s. Eurostat. (2011a). ‘Eurostat Regional Yearbook’ 2011. Belçika.
• _____.(2011b). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu , Retrieved. (17.01.2012)
• Gáková, Z., Grigonytė, D. and Monfort. P. (2009). ‘A Cross-Country Impact Assessment of EU Cohesion Policy. Applying the Cohesion System of HERMIN Models’. DirectorateGeneral for Regional Policy, Working Paper No: 01/2009, 1-14
• Heindenreich, M. (2003). Regional Inequalities in the Enlarged Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(4), 313-333.
• Leonardi, R. (2006). Cohesion in the European Union. Regional Studies, 40(2), 155-166.
• Marzinotto, B. (2012) ‘The growth effects of EU cohesion policy: a meta-analysis’, Working Paper 2012/14, Bruegel.
• Mohl, P. and Hagen, T. (2008). ‘Does EU Cohesion Policy Promote Growth? Evidence From Regional Data and Alternative Econometric Approaches’. ZEW Discussion Papers, No:08-086,
• Mustra, V. and Skrabic, B. (2011). ‘Regional Inequalities in the EU and the Role Of Institutions’. The Young Economists Seminar to Dubrovnik Economik Conference. Croatian National Bank, 1-23.
• OECD. (2004). ‘The Role of the European Union Local and Regional Development’, World Bank Institute City Round, Paris.
• Puga, D. (2002). European Regional Policy in Light of Recent Location Theories. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(4), 372–406.
• Sağbaş, İ. (2003). ‘Avrupa Birliği Bölgesel Politikası’, M. KAR ve ARIKAN. H.(eds), Avrupa Birliği Ortak Politikalar ve Türkiye: Ekonomik Sosyal ve Siyasal Politikaların Uyumlaştırılması, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul.
• Taylor, J. (2001). “Geographical Income Disparities Within Countries: Is Regional Policy the Answer?, http://www.lancs.ac.uk. , Retrieved. (22.03.2010).
• Varga, J. and in 't Veld, J. (2010). ‘The Potential Impact of EU Cohesion Policy Spending in the 2007-2013 Programming Period: A Model-Based’, European Economy - Economic Papers 422, Directorate General Economic and Monetary Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission
• Yuill, D., Mendez, C. and Wishlade. F. (2006). 'EU Cohesion policy 2007-13. The Implications for Spain: Who gets what and how?’, European Policies Research Centre, Unıversty of Strathclyde.