Türkiye’de Matematik Eğitimi Alanında Göz İzleme Teknolojisi Kullanılarak Yürütülmüş Tezlerdeki Eğilimin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK) Ulusal Tez Merkezi veri tabanına dayanarak matematik eğitiminde göz izleme teknolojisi kullanılarak yürütülmüş tezleri analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, 7’si yüksek lisans 5’i doktora tezi olmak üzere toplam 12 bilimsel tez değerlendirilmiştir. Tezler sırasıyla betimsel özellikler, yöntem bilgisi ve konu bilgisi olmak üzere üç başlık altında analiz edilmiştir. Betimsel özellikler tezlerin yayınlandığı tez türü, yıl, üniversite ve bilim dalını içermektedir. Yöntem bilgisi tezlerin araştırma yöntemi, katılımcı kitlesi, örneklem sayısı, kullanılan görüşme çeşidi ve göz izleme cihazı türü gibi bilgileri içermektedir. Konu bilgisi başlığı altında ise araştırmanın hangi konu özelinde gerçekleştirildiği bilgisi yer almaktadır. Türkiye’de matematik eğitimi tezlerinde göz izleme teknolojisinin kullanımı 2010 yılında bir yüksek lisans tezi ile başlamıştır. En fazla yayın üreten üniversiteler Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi ve Hacettepe Üniversitesi’dir. En fazla tez üreten bilim dalı ise Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bilim Dalı ve Bilişim Sistemleri Bilim Dalı’dır. Yüksek lisans tezlerinin çoğu karma araştırma yöntemine uygun olarak tasarlanmışken doktora tezlerinin çoğu nicel araştırma yöntemine uygun olarak tasarlanmıştır. Yürütülen tezlerde çoğunlukla lisans ve lisans öğrencileri ile çalışılmıştır. Uygulamalar genellikle 51-70 arasında katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yürütülen yüksek lisans tezlerinin çoğunda görüşme kullanılmışken doktora tezlerinin tamamında görüşme yöntemi kullanılmamıştır. En fazla tercih edilen göz izleyici Tobii X2-60 olmuştur. Matematik eğitiminde göz izleme teknolojisi kullanılarak çalışılan konuların başında problem çözme stratejileri ve kullanılabilirlik çalışmaları gelmektedir.

Keywords

• Betimsel araştırma
• göz hareketleri
• göz izleme
• lisansüstü tezler
• matematik eğitimi

Examination of the Trends in Theses Using Eye-Tracking Technology in the Field of Mathematics Education in Türkiye

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the theses conducted using the eye-tracking technology in mathematics education based on Council of Higher Education (CoHE) Theses Center. In this study, a total of 12 scientific theses, 7 of which were master's theses and 5 of which were doctoral theses, were evaluated. Data were analyzed with content analysis technique. The theses were analyzed under three headings: descriptive, methodology and topic information. The use of eye-tracking technology in mathematics education theses in Türkiye started with a master's theses in 2010. The universities that produced the most publications are Middle East Technical University and Hacettepe University. The departments that produced the most theses were Computer Education and Instructional Technology and Information Systems. While most of the master's theses were designed in accordance with the mixed research method, most of the doctoral theses were designed in accordance with the quantitative research method. In the theses conducted, mostly undergraduate and graduate students were studied. Applications were generally carried out with between 51-70 participants. While interviews were used in most of the master's theses, interview method was not used in all of the doctoral theses. The most preferred eye tracker was Tobii X2-60. Problem solving strategies and usability studies are the main topics studied using eye-tracking technology in mathematics education.

Keywords

• Descriptive research
• eye movements
• eye tracking
• graduate theses
• mathematics education

References

1. Akal, N. (2019). Eğitim Bilişim Ağı'ndaki matematik uygulamalarının göz izleme tekniği ile incelenmesi (Investigation of mathematics applications in the Education Information Network with eye tracking technique) [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. İstanbul University. Dissertation ID: 606909.
2. Alemdağ, E., & Çağıltay, K. (2018). A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 125, 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.023
3. Alhadreti, O., Elbabour, F., & Mayhew, P. (2017). Eye tracking in retrospective think-aloud usability testing: Is there added value?. Journal of Usability Studies, 12(3), 95-110.
4. Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018). The impact of peer solution quality on peer-feedback provision on geometry proofs: Evidence from eye-movement analysis. Learning and Instruction, 58, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003
5. Andrà, C., Arzarello, F., Ferrara, F., Holmqvist, K., Lindstrom, P., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). How students read mathematical representations: An eye tracking study. In M. Kaldrimidou & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 49–56). PME.
6. Armut, M. (2021). Yabancılara Türkçe öğretiminde öğrenicilerin grafikli sorulardaki okuma becerilerinin göz izleme tekniği ile araştırılması (Investigation of learners' reading skills in graphic questions with eye tracking technique in teaching Turkish to foreigners) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University. Dissertation ID: 668848.
7. Bağçıvan, E. (2022). Mental rotation test performance of university students: Eye tracking study [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Middle East Technical University. Dissertation ID: 778378.
8. Bayazıt, A. (2013). Farklı soru biçimlerinin göz hareketleri, başarım ve cevaplama süresine olan etkilerinin incelenmesi (Investigating the effects of different question modalities on eye movements, performance and response time) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe University. Dissertation ID: 334721.

9. Belen, R. A. (2022). Türkiye'de BÖTE alanında göz izleme teknolojisi kullanılarak yapılan yüksek lisans ve doktora tezlerindeki güncel eğilimlerin incelenmesi (Investigation of current trends in master's and doctoral theses using eye tracking technology in the field of instructional technology in Turkey) [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Mersin University. Dissertation ID: 754934.
10. Boren, T., & Ramey, J. (2000). Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(3), 261–278.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (23. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
12. Carter, B. T., & Luke, S. G. (2020). Best practices in eye tracking research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 155, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.010
13. Chen, Y. C., & Yang, F. Y. (2014). Probing the relationship between process of spatial problems solving and science learning: An eye tracking approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 579-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9504-y
14. Chesney, D. L., McNeil, N. M., Brockmole, J. R., & Kelley, K. (2013). An eye for relations: Eye-tracking indicates long-term negative effects of operational thinking on understanding of math equivalence. Memory & Cognition, 41(7), 1079–1095. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0315-8
15. Coşguner, T. (2022). Göz izleme yönteminden elde edilen ölçümler ile test ve madde istatistikleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi (Investigation of the relations between the measurements obtained from the eye-tracking method and the test and item statistics) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe University. Dissertation ID: 722434.
16. Curtis, E. T., Huebner, M. G., & LeFevre, J. A. (2016). The relationship between problem size and fixation patterns during addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2, 91–115. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v2i2.17
17. De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1986). Eye-movement data as access to solution processes of elementary addition and subtraction problems. Annual meeting of the American educational research association.
18. Elling, S., Lentz, L., & de Jong, M. (2011). Retrospective think-aloud method: Using eye movements as an extra cue for participants' verbalizations. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1161-1170). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979116
19. Göktaş, Y., Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacık, Ö., Yıldırım, G., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2012). Educational technology research trends in Turkey: A content analysis of the 2000-2009 decade. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 177-199.
20. Hahn, L., & Klein, P. (2022). Eye tracking in physics education research: A systematic literature review. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 013102.
21. Hartmann, M., Mast, F. W., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Counting is a spatial process: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Research, 80(3), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0722-5
22. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press.
23. Hyrskykari, A., Ovaska, S., Majaranta, P., Räihä, K. J., & Lehtinen, M. (2008). Gaze path stimulation in retrospective think-aloud. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.4.5
24. Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358–390. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0358
25. Ischebeck, A., Weilharter, M., & Körner, C. (2016). Eye movements reflect and shape strategies in fraction comparison. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(4), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1046464
26. Javal, L. É. (1878). Essai sur la physiologie de la lecture. Annales d'Ocilistique, 80, 97-117.
27. Javal, L. É. (1879). Essai sur la physiologie de la lecture. Annales d'Oculistique, 81, 61-73.
28. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441–480. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
29. Karaca, H. (2023). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin tam sayılarla toplama işleminde kullanılan temsiller üzerindeki göz hareketlerinin incelenmesi: Bir göz izleme çalışması (Investigation of eye movements of secondary school students on representations used in addition with integers: An eye tracking study) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Necmettin Erbakan University. Dissertation ID: 803383.
30. Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
31. Lai, M.-L., Tsai, M.-J., Yang, F.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Liu, T.-C., Lee, S. W.-Y., … Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001
32. Lilienthal, A., & Schindler, M. (2019). Current trends in the use of eye tracking in mathematics education research: A PME survey. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. A. Essien, & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of 43rd Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Pretoria, South-Africa: PME.
33. Malcı, E. (2021). Examining 10th grade students' problem-solving processes in geometry using eye tracking technology [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Middle East Technical University. Dissertation ID: 666049.
34. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
35. Maurage, P., Bollen, Z., Masson, N., & D’Hondt, F. (2021). Eye tracking studies exploring cognitive and affective processes among alcohol drinkers: A systematic review and perspectives. Neuropsychology Review, 31(1), 167-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09458-0
36. Middle East Technical University (n.d.). Human computer interaction research and application laboratory. Retrieved November 10, 2023, from https://hci.cc.metu.edu.tr/en/hci-laboratory
37. Mock, J., Huber, S., Klein, E., & Moeller, K. (2016). Insights into numerical cognition: Considering eye fixations in number processing and arithmetic. Psychological Research, 80, 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0739-9
38. Moeller, K., Neuburger, S., Kaufmann, L., Landerl, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2009). Basic number processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Development, 24(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.007
39. Myachykov, A., Cangelosi, A., Ellis, R., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). The oculomotor resonance effect in spatialnumerical mapping. Acta Psychologica, 161, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.006
40. Obersteiner, A., & Tumpek, C. (2016). Measuring fraction comparison strategies with eye-tracking. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0742-z
41. Okamoto, N., & Kuroda, Y. (2014). Understanding strategy development in mathematics: Using eye movement measurement in educational research. European Journal of Research on Education, 2(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.15527/ejre.201426252
42. Olmsted-Hawala, E. L., Murphy, E. D., Hawala, S., & Ashenfelter, K. T. (2010, April). Think-aloud protocols: a comparison of three think-aloud protocols for use in testing data-dissemination web sites for usability. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2381-2390).
43. Ott, N., Brunken, R., Vogel, M., & Malone, S. (2018). Multiple symbolic representations: The combination of formula and text supports problem solving in the mathematical field of propositional logic. Learning and Instruction, 58, 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.010
44. Perttula, A. (2017). Eye Tracking studies focusing on mathematics: A literature review. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED) (pp. 2166–2173). IATED Academy.
45. Plummer, P., DeWolf, M., Bassok, M., Gordon, P. C., & Holyoak, K. J. (2017). Reasoning strategies with rational numbers revealed by eye tracking. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79(5), 1426–1437. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1312-y
46. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
47. Strohmaier, A. R., MacKay, K. J., Obersteiner, A., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104, 147-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09948-1
48. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292
49. Tobii Technology. (2009). Guidelines for using the retrospective think aloud protocol with eye tracking. https://stemedhub.org/resources/2181/download/RTA_guidelines_eyetracking_tobii_shortpaper.pdf
50. Tonbuloğlu, İ. (2010). Göz izleme ve video kaydı yöntemleri ile ilköğretim yedinci sınıf matematik dersi öğretim yazılımlarının kullanışlılığının değerlendirilmesi (Usability test of primary seventh grade mathematics instructional software with eye tracking and video recording methods [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Marmara University. Dissertation ID: 279867.
51. Türkoğlu, H. (2014). Dinamik geometri yazılımı kullanarak göz izleme yöntemi ile alan bağımsız bilişsel stile sahip matematik öğretmen adaylarının problem çözme becerilerinin öğrenme stilleri açısından incelenmesi (Investigation of the field independent mathematic teacher candidates' problem solving skills with their learning style by using dynamic geometry software through eye tracking methodology) [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Başkent University. Dissertation ID: 428793.
52. Uçar, Z. M., & Akbolat, M. (2021). Examination of graduate thesis in terms of content and structure in the field of health management between 2010-2018. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism, 6(2), 459-470.
53. Uzunosmanoğlu, S. D. (2013). Examining computer supported collaborative problem solving processes using the dual-eye tracking paradigm [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Middle East Technical University. Dissertation ID: 351907.
54. Van Gog, T., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Witte, P. (2005). Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.11.4.237
55. Yağmur, S. (2014). Usability evaluation of dynamic geometry software through eye tracking and communication breakdown analysis [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Middle East Technical University. Dissertation ID: 409154.
56. Yardim, T., & Engin, G. (2021). An examination of graduate theses completed between 2010 and 2020 about academic procrastination. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(4), 293-309.
57. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
58. Yılmaz, N. (2019). The effect of the hypothetical learning trajectories and the contribution of the eye-tracking technology in understanding the young children's mathematical patterning recognition and generalization [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University. Dissertation ID: 602294.