Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A UTILITARIAN RESOLUTION OF THE PARETIAN LİBERAL PARADOX

Year 1999, , 101 - 103, 20.01.1999
https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.685716

Abstract

Bu makale, kişi hak ve özgürlükleri ile Pareto etkinlik arasında belirli şartlarda bir çelişki öngören “Paretian Liberal Paradoksu“nun, ilgili hak ve özgürlüklerin pozitif net toplam (toplumsal) fayda üretmeleri koşulu altında ortadan kalkacağım kanıtlamaktadır.

References

  • [1] Sen, A. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
  • [2] Aldrich, J. 1977. "The Dilemma of a Paretian Liberal: Some Consequences of Sen’s Theorem." Public Choice 30: 1-22.
  • [3] Breyer, F. 1977. "The liberal Paradox, Decisiveness over Issues and Domain Restrictions." Z. Nationalokonomie 37: 45-60.
  • [4] Gaertner, W., P. K. Pattanaik and K. Suzumura. 1992. An Individual Rights Revisited.0 Economica 59(234): 161-77.
  • [5] Gibbard, A. 1974. "A Pareto Consistent Libertarian Claim." Journal of Economic Theoıy 7: 388-410.
  • [6] Kelsey, D. 1988. "What is Responsible for the Paretian Epidemic." Social Choice and Welfare 5:303-306.
  • [7] Pressler, J. 1987. "Rights and Social Choice: Is There a Paretian Libertarian Paradox." Economics and Philosophy 3:1-22.
  • [8] Seidl, C. 1990. AOn the Impossibility of a Generalization of the Libertarian Resolution of the Liberal Paradox.@ Journal-of-Economics (Zeitschrift- fur- Nationalokonomie) 51(1): 71-88.
  • [9] Mueller D.C. 1996. "Constitutional and Liberal Rights." Analyse and Kritik 18: 96-117.
  • [10] Ng, Y.K. 1971. "The Possibility of a Paretian Liberal: Impossibility Theorems and Cardinal Utility." Journal of Political Economy 79: 1397-1402.
Year 1999, , 101 - 103, 20.01.1999
https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.685716

Abstract

References

  • [1] Sen, A. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
  • [2] Aldrich, J. 1977. "The Dilemma of a Paretian Liberal: Some Consequences of Sen’s Theorem." Public Choice 30: 1-22.
  • [3] Breyer, F. 1977. "The liberal Paradox, Decisiveness over Issues and Domain Restrictions." Z. Nationalokonomie 37: 45-60.
  • [4] Gaertner, W., P. K. Pattanaik and K. Suzumura. 1992. An Individual Rights Revisited.0 Economica 59(234): 161-77.
  • [5] Gibbard, A. 1974. "A Pareto Consistent Libertarian Claim." Journal of Economic Theoıy 7: 388-410.
  • [6] Kelsey, D. 1988. "What is Responsible for the Paretian Epidemic." Social Choice and Welfare 5:303-306.
  • [7] Pressler, J. 1987. "Rights and Social Choice: Is There a Paretian Libertarian Paradox." Economics and Philosophy 3:1-22.
  • [8] Seidl, C. 1990. AOn the Impossibility of a Generalization of the Libertarian Resolution of the Liberal Paradox.@ Journal-of-Economics (Zeitschrift- fur- Nationalokonomie) 51(1): 71-88.
  • [9] Mueller D.C. 1996. "Constitutional and Liberal Rights." Analyse and Kritik 18: 96-117.
  • [10] Ng, Y.K. 1971. "The Possibility of a Paretian Liberal: Impossibility Theorems and Cardinal Utility." Journal of Political Economy 79: 1397-1402.
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Eski Sayılar
Authors

Ahmet Kara This is me

Publication Date January 20, 1999
Published in Issue Year 1999

Cite

APA Kara, A. (1999). A UTILITARIAN RESOLUTION OF THE PARETIAN LİBERAL PARADOX. Öneri Dergisi, 2(11), 101-103. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.685716

15795

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Öneri Dergisi

Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü

Göztepe Kampüsü Enstitüler Binası Kat:5 34722  Kadıköy/İstanbul

e-ISSN: 2147-5377