PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND BEST VALUE: EMERGENCES FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW SYSTEM

Year 2007, , 209 - 216, 10.01.2007

Yüksel Demirkaya

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.686892

Abstract

This article examines New Labour’s Best Value Management Framework as applied in England and focuses on the new regime’s review system (this article intends to evaluate Best Value Management Framework and its review system in England instead examining it in UK, because of the necessity to focus on a particular approach to Best Value review system). Best Value is considered to be one of the main components of New Labour’s modernisation strategy for public Services. It is a challenging initiative in that it requires local authorities to undertake some fundamental cultural and organisational changes. In this context, it can be argued that Best Value is one of the latest stages in local government service modernisation from which others can learn

Keywords

Performance Review, English Local Government, Competition, Consultation

References

• [1] Wilson, D. & Game, C. (1998). Local Government in the United Kingdom. London: MacMillan.
• [2] Laughlin, M. (1996). The Constructional Status of Local Government. In Local Democracy on Local Government. (Eds.: Pratchett, L. & Wilson, D). London: Macmillan.
• [3] Boyne, G.; Kirkpatrick, .1. & Kitchener, M. (2001) Introduction of the Symposium on New Labor and the Modemization of Public Management. Public Administration, 79(1), 1-4.
• [4] Halachmi, A. & Vickie, L.M. (2000). Best Value and Accountability: Issues and Observations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(3), 393-414.
• [5] Wilson, J. (1999). From CCT to Best Value: Some Evidence and Observations. Local Government Studies, 25(2), 39-52.
• [6] Davis, H. & Martin, S. (1999). Evolution Best Value: Approaches to the Monitoring and Evolution of the Best Value Pilot Programme. Paper 3. Warwick, DETR.
• [7] (1998) Modernizing Local Government: Improving Local Services through Best Value. London: DETR.
• [8] (1999). Preparing Best Value. Consultation Paper. London: DETR.
• [9] Sanderson, I. (1998). Achieving Best Value Through Best Value Through Performance Review. Paper 5. Warwick: DETR.
• [10] Bovaird, T. (1998). Achieving Best Value Through Competition, Benchmarking and Performance Networks. Paper 6, Warwick, DETR.
• [11] (1998) Modern Local Government: In Touch with the People. London: DETR.
• [12] Greenwood, R. & Stewart, J. (1972). Corporate Planning and Management Organisation. Local Government Studies, 3(1). 25-40.
• [13] Gray, C.J. (1982). Corporate Planning and Measurement: A Survey. Public Administration, 60(1), 349-355.
• [14] Rhodes, R. & Midwinter, A. (1980). Corporate Management. Public Policy, 59(1).
• [15] Dearlove, J. (1979). The Reorganisation of British Local Government. Cambridge: University Press.
• [16] Boyne, G. (1999). Processes, Performance and Best Value in Local Government. Local Government Studies, 25(2), 1- 15.
• [17] The Audit Commission. (1998). Betler by Far Preparing for Best Value. London, DETR.
• [18] (1999). Implementing Best Value. A Consultation Paper on Draft Guide. London: DETR.
• [19] Martin, S.; Davis, H.; Bovaird, T.; Downe, J.; Geddes, M.; Hartley, J.; Lewis, M.; Sanderson, I. & Sapwell, P. (2001). Final Evaluation of the Best Value Pilots Programme. London: DETR.